~~Meeting Attendance Fees~~ ~~— No~~ The company does not pay meeting attendance ~~fees~~fees.


Director Fee Type	Description	Amount
Annual Retainer	Cash retainer	$120,000
Shares Fee	RSU award vesting on 1st anniversary of grant	$180,000
Lead Director Fee	Supplemental cash fee for Board leadership role	$40,000
Audit and Risk Committee Chair Fee	Supplemental cash fee for committee leadership role	$60,000
Corporate Governance and ESG Committee Chair Fee	Supplemental cash fee for committee leadership role	$25,000
Compensation and Talent Committee Chair Fee	Supplemental cash fee for committee leadership role	$25,000


¢ Annual Retainer			¢ Shares Fee

~~Shares Fee~~ ~~— Annual award of restricted stock units with a value of $150,000, which units will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant~~


38

~~Lead~~ Director ~~Fee~~ ~~— An additional annual cash fee of $25,000~~

~~Audit and Risk Committee Chair~~ ~~— An additional annual cash fee of $50,000~~

~~Corporate Governance, Nominating and~~ Compensation ~~Committee Chair~~ ~~— An additional annual cash fee of $15,000~~

We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our non-executive (and executive) directors, which provide for indemnification, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, with respect to all expenses and claims that a director incurs in connection with any event or occurrence related to the fact that the director was serving as a director, officer, fiduciary, employee, agent or advisor of Raymond James or any of our affiliates. Pursuant to the agreements, directors may also obtain advancement of certain expenses in connection with indemnified claims. (A copy of the form of indemnification agreement is an exhibit 10.8 to our 2022 Annual Report ~~on Form 10-K,~~to Shareholders, as filed with the SEC.)

~~Stock Ownership Policy for Non-Executive Directors~~

~~The Board maintains a Board and Executive Officer Stock Ownership Policy that requires~~We encourage our ~~non-executive~~ directors to ~~attain certain levels~~attend educational programs that assist them in the performance of ~~ownership~~their duties, and we reimburse reasonable costs of such attendance where approved in advance by the fifth annual directors meeting after their joining our Board. The policy requires non-executive directors to own shares of at least five (5) times the value of their annual cash retainer. For this purpose, shares held are valued at the weighted average of the closing prices on the NYSE on the date of each separate acquisition, and compliance with the policy is tested annually. Shares that count toward satisfaction of the requirement consist of shares directly or indirectly owned, shares jointly owned with immediate family members, shares owned indirectly through a retirement plan, and restricted stock and time-vesting RSUs during the vesting period. Until the required ownership level is achieved, each non-executive director must retain 100% of the net shares (after any deductions from the vesting award for exercise price or taxes) obtained through the company’s share incentive plans.company.

~~The following table shows, as of September 30, 2017, the status of our non-executive directors meeting the requirements of the policy.~~

Name Year Service Commenced
Shares of
Stock Held
(#)
Restricted Stock Units Held
(#)
Total Shares Held
(#)
Share Ownership Goal Met⁽¹⁾
Charles G. von Arentschildt 2015 3,935
1,580 5,515 —
Shelley G. Broader 2008 17,857
2,780 20,637 ü
Jeffrey N. Edwards 2014 8,257
2,380 10,637 ü

Benjamin C. Esty 2014 7,557
2,380 9,937 ü
Gordon L. Johnson 2010 13,087
3,800 16,887 ü
Roderick C. McGeary 2015 3397
1,580 4,977 —
Robert P. Saltzman 2007 20,357
2,780 23,137 ü
Susan N. Story 2008 20,714
2,780 23,494 ü

~~________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~Based on our current compensation practices, it is anticipated that Messrs. von Arentschildt and McGeary will attain their share ownership goal within the time period prescribed by the policy.~~

Director Compensation Table for ~~2017~~2022

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-executive directors for services during fiscal 2022.


Name(1)	Fees Paid in Cash(2)			Stock Awards(3)			All Other Compensation(4)		Total
Marlene Debel		$110,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,735		$292,648
Robert M. Dutkowsky		$110,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$292,031
Jeffrey N. Edwards		$110,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$292,031
Benjamin C. Esty		$170,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$352,031
Anne Gates		$122,500			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$304,531
Gordon L. Johnson		$211,500	(6)		$232,335	(7)		$2,875		$446,710
Roderick C. McGeary		$110,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$292,031
Raj Seshadri		$110,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$292,031
Susan N. Story		$150,000			$179,913	(5)		$2,118		$332,031

(1)Mr. Bo Godbold, a former director who did not stand for re-election at the 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting, is an employee who did not receive any additional compensation for his part-year services as a director. Please see the section below titled “Relationships and Related Transactions” for information regarding his compensation as an employee.

(2)Includes the annual retainer and, as applicable, Lead Director and committee chair fees.

(3)The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted to our directors who are not named executive officers in fiscal year ~~2017.~~2022, computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value for RSUs is measured based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

(4)All other compensation represents accrued dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs as of September 30, 2022.

Name ⁽¹⁾
Fees Paid
in Cash
($)⁽²⁾
Stock
Awards
($)⁽³⁾
All Other
Compensation ($) ⁽⁴⁾
Total
($)
Charles G. von Arentschildt $ 90,000
$ 124,931

$ 2,336
$ 217,267
Shelley G. Broader $ 90,000
$ 124,931
$ 7,452
$ 222,383
Jeffrey N. Edwards $ 90,000
$ 124,931
$ 5,000
$ 219,931
Benjamin C. Esty $ 132,500
$ 124,931
$ 5,000
$ 262,431
Gordon L. Johnson $ 130,000
⁽⁵⁾
$ 148,589
⁽⁶⁾
$ 7,852
$ 286,441
Roderick C. McGeary $ 90,000
$ 124,931

$ 2,775
$ 217,706
Robert P. Saltzman $ 105,000
$ 124,931
$ 7,452
$ 237,383
Susan N. Story $ 115,000
$ 124,931
$ 7,452
$ 247,383
(5)This award of 1,683 RSUs was granted on February 24, 2022, at a grant date fair value per share of $106.90. This award vests at the next annual meeting.

~~________________~~


~~(1)~~	Mr. Godbold, our Vice Chairman, is an employee who does not receive any additional compensation for services as a director. Please see the section below entitled “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS” for information regarding his compensation as an employee.


~~(2)~~	~~Includes the annual retainer and, as applicable, Lead Director and committee chair fees.~~

~~(3)~~

The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’) granted to our directors who are not Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2017. The grant date fair value per share of the RSUs granted to each of the directors in fiscal year 2017 under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 (‘‘ASC Topic 718’’) was $79.07. Awards vest on the first anniversary of the grant.


~~(4)~~	~~All other compensation represents accrued dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock units as of September 30, 2017.~~


~~(5)~~	~~The fees paid in cash to Mr. Johnson include $40,000 in fees paid to him by RJ Bank as a director of RJ Bank.~~


~~(6)~~	~~Includes 300 RSUs awarded to Mr. Johnson for services provided as a director of RJ Bank.~~

(6)The fees paid in cash to Mr. Johnson include $59,250 paid to him by Raymond James Bank for his service as a director and committee chair and $14,750 paid to him by TriState Capital Bank for his service as a director.

(7)Includes 1,683 RSUs granted on February 24, 2022, at a grant date fair value per share of $106.90, 327 RSUs awarded to Mr. Johnson on February 24, 2022, at a grant date fair value per share of $106.90 for service as a director of Raymond James Bank, and 164 RSUs awarded to Mr. Johnson on August 24, 2022, at a grant date fair market value of $106.50 for service as a director for TriState Capital Bank. These awards vest at the next annual meeting.

The aggregate number of share awards outstanding, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, for each of our non-executive directors was as follows:


Name			Restricted Stock Units Outstanding (#)
Marlene Debel			1,683
Robert M. Dutkowsky			1,683
Jeffrey N. Edwards			1,683
Benjamin C. Esty			1,683
Anne Gates			1,683
Gordon L. Johnson			2,174
Roderick C. McGeary			1,683
Raj Seshadri			1,683
Susan N. Story			1,683


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			39

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on
Executive Compensation



~~Name~~ What is being voted on: An advisory vote to approve the compensation of all of our NEOs.		~~Restricted~~ ~~Stock Units Outstanding~~ ~~(#)~~Board recommendation:Our Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the resolution approving the executive compensation of our NEOs.
~~Charles G. von Arentschildt~~		~~1,580~~
~~Shelley G. Broader~~	~~2,780~~
~~Jeffrey N. Edwards~~	~~2,380~~
~~Benjamin C. Esty~~	~~2,380~~
~~Gordon L. Johnson~~	~~3,800~~
~~Roderick C. McGeary~~	~~1,580~~
~~Robert P. Saltzman~~	~~2,780~~
~~Susan N. Story~~	~~2,780~~

We are asking our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEOs’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

Accordingly, we are asking you to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

~~SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS~~“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.”

The ~~following table sets forth~~say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the ~~shares beneficially owned~~company, the C&T Committee or our Board. Our Board and C&T Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and — to the extent that there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as ~~of December 12, 2017 by each shareholder known~~disclosed in this proxy statement — we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and evaluate whether any actions are necessary to usaddress those concerns. Under the Board’s current policy, shareholders are given an opportunity to ~~beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of~~cast an advisory vote on this topic annually, with the next opportunity occurring in connection with the company’s ~~outstanding shares. The percentage~~Annual Meeting of ~~ownership indicated~~Shareholders in ~~the following table is based on 145,316,996 shares outstanding as of December 12, 2017.~~2024.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership⁽¹⁾
Percent of
Class
Thomas A. James, Chairman Emeritus, Director, 13,858,394
9.54 %
880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716
BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022
10,914,212
⁽²⁾
7.70 %
The Vanguard Group, Inc., 100 Vanguard Boulevard,
Malvern, PA 19355 10,109,002
⁽³⁾
7.12 %

~~________________~~


~~(1)~~40			~~Except as described otherwise in the footnotes to this table, each beneficial owner in the table has sole voting and investment power with regard to the shares beneficially owned by such owner.~~


~~(2)~~	On January 25, 2017, BlackRock, Inc., on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, ‘‘BlackRock’’) filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that BlackRock had sole voting power with respect to 10,197,529 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 10,914,212 shares, of our common stock.

~~(3)~~

On February 13, 2017, The Vanguard Group, Inc., on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Vanguard”) filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that Vanguard had sole voting power with respect to 102,565 shares, shared voting power with respect to 23,202 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 9,981,343 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 127,659 shares, of our common stock.

~~SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT~~

The following table lists the shares of common stock beneficially owned as of December 12, 2017 by (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (3) all current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on ~~145,316,996 of the company’s shares outstanding on December 12, 2017.~~Executive Compensation

Beneficial ownership reported in the below table has been determined according to SEC regulations and includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days after December 12, 2017, upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, director nominees and executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. Except as indicated, no shares are pledged as security. As of December 12, 2017, no individual director, director nominee or named executive officer other than Thomas A. James, our Chairman Emeritus, owned beneficially 1% or more of our shares, and our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group owned approximately 10.46% of our outstanding shares.

Name
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Owned Shares
Number of Shares Subject to Exercisable Stock Options Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of Restricted Stock Units Total Number of Beneficially Owned Shares Percent of Class
Thomas A. James 13,854,744
⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
—
3,650
13,858,394
9.54 %
Charles G. von Arentschildt 3,935
—
—
3,935
*
Shelley G. Broader 17,857
—
—
17,857
*
John C. Carson, Jr. 55,835
⁽²⁾
7,500
3,764
67,099
*
Jeffrey N. Edwards 8,257
—
—
8,257
*
Benjamin C. Esty 7,557
—
—
7,557
*
Francis S. Godbold 154,611
⁽²⁾
—
—
154,611
*
Gordon L. Johnson 13,087
—
—
13,087
*
Jeffrey P. Julien 55,050
⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
19,190
2,281
76,521
*
Roderick C. McGeary 3,397
—
—
3,397
*
Paul C. Reilly 107,519
⁽²⁾
19,890
14,142
141,551
*
Robert P. Saltzman 20,357
—
—
20,357
*
Susan N. Story 20,174
—
—
20,174
*
Jeffrey E. Trocin 159,186
⁽²⁾
37,500
6,387
203,073
*
Dennis W. Zank 199,063
⁽²⁾
9,890
4,220
213,173
*
All Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group
(25 persons) 14,935,621
⁽²⁾
232,267
61,357
15,229,245
10.46 %

~~__________________~~


*	~~Less than 1%.~~


~~(1)~~	Includes 662,754 shares held by the Robert A. James Irrevocable Trust, for which Thomas A. James serves as trustee, and which has as beneficiaries other James family members. Thomas A. James disclaims any beneficial ownership interest in this trust. Includes 108,087 shares held by Thomas A. James’ spouse.


~~(2)~~	~~Includes shares credited to Employee Stock Ownership Plan accounts.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Includes 3,740 shares held by Mr. Julien’s spouse.~~

~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

Compensation Discussion ~~and~~& Analysis

~~Introduction~~

Named Executive Officers

This section ~~of our Proxy Statement~~ presents a discussion and analysis of the philosophy and objectives of ~~our Board’s Corporate Governance, Nominating~~the Compensation and ~~Compensation~~Talent Committee ~~(referred to in this section as the “Committee”~~(the "Committee") in designing and implementing compensation programs for our executive officers. ~~This section describes~~We describe the ~~2017~~ compensation ~~determinations~~decisions relating to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers ~~(referred to as our~~(collectively, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”)~~. Our named executive officers~~, who for ~~2017~~2022 were:

Paul C. Reilly

Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Paul M. Shoukry

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

James E. Bunn

President — Global Equities and Investment Banking

Scott A. Curtis

President — Private Client Group

Tashtego S. Elwyn

President and Chief Executive Officer — Raymond James and Associates

Compensation-Setting Process

Annual Compensation Framework & Process


Compensation and Talent Committee			•The Committee sets performance priorities at the beginning of each fiscal year to guide its evaluation of company and individual executive officer performance throughout the year. The Committee also stipulates that annual bonuses will be funded from a pool not to exceed 6% of consolidated pre-tax income, with no individual bonus to exceed 3% of such measure. •The Committee (in the absence of the CEO) reviews the performance of the CEO and determines the appropriate amounts of his annual bonus and retention RSU grants. In the course of its deliberations, the Committee also discusses these recommendations with the other non-executive directors. •To inform its use of discretion in determining compensation, the Committee evaluates both company and individual performance. The Committee does not utilize formulaic financial performance goals or targets, and performance metrics are not assigned any specific weighting for purposes of determining the compensation awarded to the CEO or other NEOs. Since market conditions — and the macroeconomic environment — strongly affect the financial services industry and can change dramatically during the course of a year, the Committee assesses financial performance at the end of the year in light of the most recent facts and circumstances. No single financial or performance metric controls compensation decisions. Rather, such data are used to help the Committee better understand company and individual performance. After evaluating the performance of our CEO and each of our other NEOs for the relevant fiscal year, the Committee applies its discretion to determine the compensation for each.
Chair and CEO			•Following completion of a fiscal year, our chair and CEO reviews the performance of the company and evaluates the individual performance of each executive officer, including the NEOs, against previously-determined individual goals. Our CEO then makes recommendations to the Committee as to the respective amounts of annual bonus and retention RSUs to be awarded to each NEO (other than himself).
Compensation Consultants			•Provide market data in connection with the Committee’s 2022 compensation determinations for executive officers, including our NEOs.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			41

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive ~~Officer~~Compensation

~~Jeffrey P. Julien, Executive Vice President — Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer~~

Set Performance Priorities

Will guide evaluation of company and individual executive officer performance throughout the year

Reviews Company Performance

Reviews the performance of the company for the fiscal year

Determine Compensation

The Committee applies its discretion to determine the compensation for each NEO

Evaluates Individual Performance

The Committee evaluates each executive officer’s performance against previously-determined individual goals

~~John C. Carson, Jr., President~~

~~Jeffrey E. Trocin, Co-President - Global Equities and Investment Banking - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.~~Use of Compensation Consultants

~~Dennis W. Zank, Chief Operating Officer~~

~~We seek to establish and maintain~~In making compensation policies that will enable us to attract, motivate and retain high-quality executive officers and ensure that their individual interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our goal is to utilize our compensation programs to reward executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and increased total shareholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Our executive officers’ total compensation is comprised of a mix of base salary, annual incentive bonus (which includes both cash and time- and performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards), grants of retention restricted stock units, and retirement plan contributions. The Committee does not utilize formulaic financial performance goals or targets in awarding compensation. Rather,decisions, the Committee ~~reviews~~considers numerous factors of company and individual performance, ~~each year, and then applies its discretion in determining the appropriate amounts of compensation for the fiscal year, based on a variety of factors, both objective and subjective.~~

~~Fiscal 2017 Company Performance Highlights~~

~~Financial Performance.~~ Our company generated strong financial results in fiscal 2017. We achieved record annual net revenues of $6.37 billion and record net income of $636.2 million, or $4.33 per diluted share. On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted net income was $768.1 million⁽¹⁾~~, or $5.23 per diluted share~~⁽¹⁾~~. Our other financial accomplishments during the year included:~~

~~Net revenues increased 18% and diluted earnings per share increased 19% compared to fiscal 2016,~~


•	~~Adjusted diluted earnings per share of $5.23~~⁽¹⁾ ~~increased 33% compared to adjusted diluted earnings per share of $3.93 in fiscal 2016,~~


•	~~Our return on equity for the fiscal year was 12.2%, or 14.5%~~⁽¹⁾ ~~on an adjusted basis, which is a satisfactory result particularly given our prudent capital position throughout fiscal 2017,~~

~~The ratio of the firm’s total capital to risk-weighted assets remained above 20% throughout the year, well above regulatory requirements,~~

~~The company’s debt credit ratings were upgraded by both Standard & Poors and Moody’s, and~~

~~The company was added to the S&P 500 index.~~

~~________________~~

⁽¹⁾ Adjusted net income, adjusted net income per diluted share, and adjusted return on equity are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to page 38 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, filed with the SEC on November 22, 2017, for reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and other required disclosures.

~~The firm’s solid performance in fiscal 2017 was driven by record annual net revenues and pre-tax income in all of our core segments.~~

~~Private Client Group~~ - Record net revenues of $4.42 billion increased 22% and record pre-tax income of $373.0 million increased 10% over fiscal 2016. Record net revenues were driven by strong growth in assets in fee-based accounts, a significant net increase in the number of financial advisors to a record 7,346, and the benefit derived from higher short-term interest rates. Private Client Group assets under administration ended the fiscal year at a record $659.5 billion, representing 15% growth over September 30, 2016. Despite elevated legal and regulatory expenses during the year, the increase in revenues coupled with disciplined management of discretionary expenses helped the Private Client Group segment generate record pre-tax income in fiscal 2017.

~~Capital Markets~~ - Record net revenues of $1.01 billion and record pre-tax income of $141.2 million both increased 1% over fiscal 2016. Record results in the Capital Markets segment were lifted by record investment banking revenues of $398.7 million, which were up 31% over fiscal 2016. Improved M&A and equity underwriting results more than offset both the decline in trading profits and the market-driven decline in institutional commissions.

~~Asset Management~~ - Record net revenues of $487.7 million increased 21% and record pre-tax income of $171.7 million increased 30% over fiscal 2016. Record net revenues were driven by growth in financial assets under management, which reached a record $96.4 billion at the end of the fiscal year. The 25% annual growth in financial assets under management was mostly attributable to strong net inflows in fee-based accounts in the Private Client Group, market appreciation, and modest net inflows generated by Carillon Tower Advisers / Eagle.

~~Raymond James Bank~~ - Record net revenues of $592.7 million increased 20% and record pre-tax income of $409.3 million increased 21% over fiscal 2016. Record results were driven by robust loan growth, as diversification of the loan portfolio with a focus on lending to clients of the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments helped mitigate the modest decline of the C&I portfolio. Net loans at Raymond James Bank

~~________________~~

finished the year at a record $17.0 billion, reflecting 12% growth for the year. The Bank also increased its available-for-sale, agency-backed securities portfolio, which ended the year at $2.1 billion. Despite diversification outside the higher-yielding C&I portfolio, the increase in short-term interest rates helped the Bank’s net interest margin increase by 6 basis points on year-over-year basis.

~~Strategic Execution.~~ In addition to outstanding financial results, the firm successfully executed several strategic initiatives during fiscal 2017. In the Private Client Group segment, in addition to excellent organic growth of financial advisors, the successful integrations of the Alex. Brown and 3Macs acquisitions, which closed in late fiscal 2016, significantly expanded the Private Client Group footprint in highly-desirable markets in both the U.S. and Canada. Similarly, the successful integration of the Mummert & Company acquisition in the Capital Markets segment broadened and strengthened our cross-border M&A platform, which contributed to the record investment banking revenues generated in fiscal 2017. In the Asset Management segment, we continued to increase the utilization of both managed and non-managed fee based accounts by our Private Client Group clients. Raymond James Bank continued to utilize its lending solutions to better serve clients in the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments, and initiated its efforts to deliberately grow its agency-backed securities portfolio to efficiently utilize its capital. Finally, we continued investing heavily in technology to strengthen our relationships with our advisors and clients and to remain compliant with regulatory requirements. Most importantly, we successfully implemented these strategic initiatives while maintaining our unique, client-focused culture.

~~Summary of Compensation Decisions for 2017~~

After assessing the company’s financial and strategic performance for fiscal 2017, and after further evaluating the individual performance of our named executive officers, the Committee exercised its discretion to award total annual direct compensation for 2017 to our NEOs as set forth in the following table. For purposes of this table, ‘‘total annual direct compensation’’ means the sum of (i) salary for the fiscal year indicated, (ii) the annual bonus (both cash and equity components) and (iii) retention RSUs earned during such fiscal year but awarded in the subsequent fiscal year.

Total Annual Direct Compensation
Named Executive Officer Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2016 Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
Paul C. Reilly $11,090,000 $8,414,400 31.80%
Jeffrey P. Julien $3,121,500 $2,689,700 16.05%
John C. Carson, Jr. $3,391,500 $3,559,700 (4.73)%
Jeffrey E. Trocin $4,246,500 $2,564,661 65.58%
Dennis W. Zank $4,021,500 $3,689,700 8.99%

This table depicts how the Committee viewed its compensation decisions for our NEOs, but the presentation herein differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table (‘‘SCT’’) on page 39 that is required by SEC rules. This table is not a substitute for the information presented in the SCT. Among other differences, the table above includes equity awards in the column for the fiscal year they were earned, rather than the year in which the grant date occurred. Please see the note on page 32 for further important information on the differences between this presentation and the SCT.

~~While it considers numerous factors with respect to company and individual performance during the year,~~ as well as ~~certain~~ market data regarding compensation levels for ~~particular~~ comparable industry ~~positions, the~~positions. The Committee does not attempt to rank or assign relative weight to any particular ~~factor.~~factor, however. The Committee does not rely on any ~~single~~ factor as a substitute for its own judgment, ~~in making compensation decisions,~~ but rather applies its independent discretion ~~in considering them~~to consider all factors in their entirety. Although the Committee did not ~~‘‘benchmark’’~~“benchmark” compensation against ~~the compensation practices of~~ a peer group, it did engage an outside compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, to provide ~~certain~~ market data in connection with its ~~2017~~2022 compensation determinations for ~~certain of our~~ executive officers, including our ~~chief executive officer.~~NEOs. The Committee uses such data as a reference ~~material~~ to assist it in maintaining a general awareness of industry compensation standards and trends. The market data does not formulaically determine the Committee’s compensation decisions for any particular executive officer, however. Similarly, the Committee does not target a particular percentile of any peer group with respect to total pay packages or any individual component of pay but instead uses the percentiles as a reference.

Peer Group Comparisons

For 2022, the Committee utilized the following peer groups for the indicated NEOs:

Peer Group for Mr. Reilly — Chair and CEO, and Mr. Shoukry — CFO


Affiliated Managers Group	Franklin Resources Inc.	Northern Trust Corporation
Ameriprise Financial Inc.	Invesco Ltd.	State Street Corporation
Bank of New York Mellon	Jefferies Financial Group Inc.	Stifel Financial Corp.
Charles Schwab Corp.	Lazard Ltd.	T. Rowe Price Group Inc.
Edward Jones	LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

Peer Group for Mr. Bunn — President, Global Equities and Investment Banking


Head of Investment Banking Role		Head of Equities Role
Cowen Inc.	William Blair & Company	Cowen Inc.	Truist
SVB Leerink LLC	Piper Sandler	KeyCorp.	William Blair & Company
Moelis & Company Group LP	Greenhill	JMP Securities	Robert W. Baird & Co.
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.	Houlihan Lokey	SVB Leerink LLC	Royal Bank of Canada
JMP Securities	Lazard Ltd.	Nomura Securities	Wells Fargo Bank
Robert W. Baird & Co.		Piper Sandler

Peer Group for Mr. Curtis — President, Private Client Group


Head of Wealth Management
Bank of America	Robert W. Baird & Co.	UBS Group
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.	Royal Bank of Canada	Wells Fargo Bank
Morgan Stanley	Truist

~~________________~~


42

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Peer Group for Mr. Elwyn — President and CEO, Raymond James and Associates


Head of Brokerage Business
Ameriprise Financial Inc.	Morgan Stanley	UBS Group
Bank of America	Robert W. Baird & Co.	Wells Fargo Bank
Cetera	Royal Bank of Canada

Consideration of 2022 “Say-on-Pay” Vote

We hold an annual advisory vote of our shareholders on executive compensation. The following table sets forth the percentage of shares voted in favor of our annual advisory proposals to approve NEO compensation for the fiscal years indicated (the “Say-on-Pay” proposal).


2017						2018						2019						2020						2021						2022

⁽¹⁾

At the 2022 Annual Shareholders Meeting, 95% of the votes cast were in favor of the “Say-on-Pay” proposal. We believe that the 2022 vote approving the Say-on-Pay proposal once again conveyed our shareholders’ strong support of the Committee’s decisions and our existing executive compensation programs. Based on this feedback, the Committee determined to continue our current compensation practices as described herein.

Fiscal 2022 Company Performance Highlights

Strategic Execution

By remaining focused on our client-first strategy of providing outstanding service to our advisors and their clients, the firm generated record results and successfully executed several strategic initiatives during the year. In the Private Client Group segment, despite declines in equity markets, fiscal 2022 was a strong year for organic client asset growth, retention of advisors and financial advisor recruiting. In the Capital Markets segment, we achieved strong results as record M&A revenues partially offset weaker underwriting and fixed income brokerage revenues due to a challenging market environment. The Asset Management segment continued to benefit from increased utilization of fee-based accounts by our Private Client Group clients. The Bank segment experienced strong growth in net interest income driven by the increase in short-term interest rates, along with strong loan growth.

We made significant progress deploying capital over the past year through organic growth and strategic acquisitions. Following our longstanding, disciplined approach to strategic acquisitions, we were pleased to add three firms to the Raymond James family this year. Each firm met our strict criteria of constituting a good cultural fit, filling a strategic purpose, and making financial sense for our shareholders.

•Charles Stanley Group PLC – U.K.-based provider of holistic wealth management services to private clients, charities, trusts and institutions. At the time of closing, added £27.1 billion ($36 billion) of client assets under administration and nearly 200 financial advisors.

•TriState Capital Holdings, Inc. – Diversified financial services firm providing banking and asset management services to individuals, corporations and municipalities. Operates a branchless bank model with total deposits of $12.6 billion and total loans of $11.5 billion, at the time of closing, including an industry-leading securities-based lending portfolio.

•SumRidge Partners, LLC – Technology-driven fixed income market maker specializing in investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, municipal bonds, and institutional preferred securities.

The firm also continued to invest in service delivery and enhanced capabilities while focusing on improving operational efficiencies. Throughout the fiscal year, we remained focused on the long term and continued to invest in our businesses, our people and our technology to help drive growth across the firm. Most importantly, we successfully implemented these strategic initiatives while maintaining our unique, client-focused culture.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			43

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Financial Performance

•Record annual net revenues of $11.0 billion, an increase of 13% over 2021

•Record net income available to common shareholders of $1.51 billion, or $6.98 per diluted share; Record adjusted net income available to common shareholders of $1.62 billion(1), or $7.49 per diluted share(1)

•Return on common equity of 17.0% and adjusted return on common equity of 18.2%(1), both strong results particularly given our robust capital position throughout fiscal 2022

•Returned $437 million to shareholders through common stock dividends and share repurchases

•Completed acquisitions of Charles Stanley Group, TriState Capital Holdings, and SumRidge Partners

•Maintained strong capital position, with total capital to risk-weighted assets of 20.4%, well above regulatory requirements

Raymond James Financial

Net Revenues ($B)

Raymond James Financial
Pre-tax Income ($B)

(1)Adjusted net income available to common shareholders, adjusted ~~net income~~earnings per diluted share, and adjusted return on common equity are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to ~~page 38~~Appendix A for reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and other important disclosures.

The firm’s strong performance in fiscal 2022 was driven by record revenues in the Private Client Group, Asset Management and Bank segments and record pre-tax income in the Private Client Group. The results highlight the resilience of the business model and reinforce the value of our ~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for~~diverse and complementary businesses.

•Private Client Group — Record net revenues of $7.71 billion increased 17%, and record pre-tax income of $1.03 billion increased 38%, compared to fiscal 2021. Record net revenues were driven by higher asset management and related administrative fees, along with the benefit of higher short-term interest rates. Private Client Group assets under administration ended the fiscal year at $1.04 trillion, declining 7% compared to September 30, 2021, due to lower equity markets, which more than offset net new assets added to the platform during the year.

•Capital Markets — Net revenues of $1.81 billion decreased 4%, and pre-tax income of $415 million decreased 22%, compared to the record results generated in fiscal 2021. Despite volatile and uncertain markets, Capital Markets segment results were driven by record M&A revenues, which partially offset lower underwriting and fixed income brokerage revenues.

•Asset Management — Record net revenues of $914 million increased 5%, and pre-tax income of $386 million declined 1%, compared to fiscal 2021. Record net revenues were driven by higher asset management and related administrative fees due to higher PCG assets in fee-based accounts for most of the year. However, financial assets under management ended the year at $173.8 billion, representing a 9% decline year-over-year, as strong net inflows in fee-based accounts in the Private Client Group were offset by fixed income and equity market declines, along with net outflows for Raymond James Investment Management.

•Bank Segment — Record net revenues of $1.08 billion increased 61%, and pre-tax income of $382 million increased 4%, over fiscal 2021. Net revenue growth was largely due to higher loan balances, including nearly $11.5 billion of loans acquired with TriState Capital Bank, and net interest margin (“NIM”) expansion during the year. Net loans increased 73% to end the fiscal year at $43.2 billion. The strong loan growth was driven by the loans acquired with TriState Capital Bank, along with the growth of loans to Private Client Group clients and corporate loans at Raymond James Bank. The Bank segment’s NIM increased 44 basis points during the fiscal year to 2.39%, reflecting higher short-term interest rates and the relatively high concentration of floating-rate assets. The credit quality of the loan portfolio remained strong, with criticized loans as a percent of total loans held for investment ending the quarter at 1.14%, down from 3.27% at September 2021. Bank loan allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans held for investment was 0.91%, and bank loan allowance for credit losses on corporate loans as a percentage of corporate loans held for investment was 1.73%.


44

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Alignment of CEO Compensation with Total Shareholder Return

The following graph shows the total return on $100 invested in the company’s stock on September 30, 2017, ~~filed~~compared to the total annual direct compensation of our CEO for each year represented. We believe this demonstrates that our CEO’s total compensation is highly correlated with total shareholder return over these time periods.

Alignment of CEO Compensation with Total Shareholder Return


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			45

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Practices



			What We Do
			Pay for performance. We award annual variable compensation based on the performance of the company and the individual. The great majority of our executive officers’ compensation is variable and not guaranteed. Use deferred compensation. Variable compensation for our executive officers also includes a deferred component, in that a portion of annual bonuses (“stock bonus awards”) is delivered in the form of both time-based and performance-based RSUs. Performance-based equity awards. The vesting of 60% for our CEO, and 50% for our other NEOs, of the RSUs awarded to our executive officers as stock bonus awards is tied to the achievement of defined Adjusted ROE(1) levels over a three-year measurement period (“performance vesting”), subject in certain cases to accelerated vesting upon retirement. Since the grant of the 2021 awards, such vesting is further modified (increased or decreased) by the rTSR of the company compared to a peer group ("rTSR Adjustment"). Long vesting periods. Both the time-vesting and performance-vesting portions of our stock bonus awards generally vest on a cliff basis three years after the grant date. Both our outstanding legacy stock options and the retention RSUs with which we have replaced them generally vest 60% on the 3rd anniversary, and 20% on each of the 4th and 5th anniversaries, of their grant dates, subject in certain cases to accelerated vesting upon retirement. In addition, each award under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), a non-qualified retention plan for highly compensated employees, cliff vests at the end of a five-year period. “Clawback” policy. We maintain a robust compensation recoupment policy, which permits the company to recover compensation in the event of a financial restatement, inaccurate performance measures, and serious misconduct or materially imprudent judgment that results in material financial or reputational harm to the company. Stock ownership guidelines. We maintain stock ownership requirements for our executive officers, creating a further link between management interests, company performance and shareholder value. All of our NEOs have reached or exceeded the ownership requirements. “Double triggers.” Our award agreements for RSUs generally maintain the requirement of “double triggers” on the accelerated vesting of awards in the event of a change in control, meaning that an executive must actually be terminated following the change in control before vesting will be accelerated. Limited perquisites. We provide very limited perquisites that provide a demonstrable benefit to the company’s business.



			What We Don’t Do
			No employment agreements. Our executive officers, including our CEO and other NEOs, are employed by us on an “at will” basis and do not have any special arrangements for severance payments following termination. No dividends on unearned performance-based or unvested U.S. time-based awards. We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on performance-based awards or on time-based awards to U.S. grantees during the vesting period. Rather, dividends are deferred and paid only based on performance or vesting achieved, with no premiums. No “gross ups.” We do not generally provide excise tax “gross ups,” other than in the case of certain relocation expenses, consistent with our relocation policy. No pledging by insiders. The company maintains a policy under which our directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging our common stock. No short selling or hedging by insiders. Our directors and executive officers are prohibited from engaging in short sales, transacting in publicly traded or private options and engaging in hedging or monetization transactions with respect to our common stock. No option re-pricing. Our equity incentive plans contain certain provisions prohibiting option re-pricing absent approval of our shareholders. We have not granted options to our executive officers as part of their annual compensation since fiscal 2014 in any event.

(1)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the ~~SEC~~most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.


46

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on ~~November 22, 2017,~~Executive Compensation

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

We compete for ~~reconciliations~~talent with other large financial services firms throughout the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Europe, and our ability to sustain or improve our position in this highly competitive environment depends substantially on our ability to continue to attract and retain the most qualified employees. We thus strive to design compensation programs that enable us to attract, motivate and retain high- quality executive officers and ensure that their individual interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our pay-for-performance goal is to reward executive officers for the achievement of near-term and long-term strategic and operational goals, while at the same time avoiding excessive risk-taking. We therefore structure our incentive awards to include vesting, deferred payment, and cancellation and clawback provisions that protect the company.

Our executive compensation program emphasizes discretionary variable annual performance compensation and long-term incentive compensation, a portion of which will be received by the executive only upon our attainment of specific financial targets. We award annual grants to reward achievement of the company’s financial and strategic objectives. In addition, a portion of long-term incentive compensation serves shareholders’ interests by conditioning vesting upon future performance that delivers on the company’s long-term business strategy. The Committee believes that delivering equity aligns employees’ interests with those of shareholders and helps motivate executives to achieve financial and strategic goals within the bounds of the company’s risk tolerance levels.

Changes to Our Executive Officer Compensation Practices

We made no significant changes to our executive officer compensation practices.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			47

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

The Committee utilizes the following balanced mix of compensation elements for executive officers, with total compensation weighted heavily towards variable elements that reward longer-term performance.


Type	Pay Element	Purpose	Link to Strategy
	Base Salary	•Provides base level of pay	•Competitive salaries attract and retain key talent
	Annual Bonus – Cash	•Provides competitive incentive opportunity	•Rewards executives who achieve strategic goals •Incentivizes behaviors consistent with our firmwide strategy •Attracts and retains key talent
	Annual Bonus – Equity	•Aligns executive with shareholder interests •Encourages retention by vesting at end of 3-year period •Performance vesting awards depend on company’s achievement of Adjusted ROE(1) and rTSR thresholds, thus further aligning executive with long-term shareholder interests	•Serves as a long-term retention tool and further aligns our executives with our shareholders •Encourages focus of executives on key financial metrics and final payout is dependent on company performance •Links our executives to long-term success and does not encourage taking unnecessary or outsized risks
	Retention Awards – RSUs	•Aligns executive with shareholder interests •Encourages retention by longer vesting period	•Serves as a long-term retention tool and further aligns our executives with our shareholders
	Retirement Plan Contributions	•Profit Sharing, ESOP, LTIP, and 401(k) align executive with shareholder interests since contributions are based on company financial results	•Market competitive and aligns with our shareholders and financial performance

(1)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and other required disclosures.

Base Salaries

~~decisions~~Competitive salaries attract and retain key talent. During fiscal year 2022, base salaries across the organization were reviewed given the challenging recruiting environment and inflationary pressures and increases were made. The 2022 base salary for ~~any particular executive officer. The Committee does not target~~our NEOs reflects a ~~particular percentile of the peer group~~blended year with ~~respect to total pay packages or any individual component of pay.~~an increase effective January 2022.

~~For 2017, the Committee approved the use of four peer groups:~~

A “corporate” peer group that was considered in reference to compensation decisions for Messrs. Reilly and Julien (our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively), which included compensation information for similar positions in companies of comparable size to Raymond James (“Corporate Peers”),

A second peer group that was considered in reference to compensation decisions for Mr. Carson (our President, Fixed Income and Public Markets), which included compensation information for similar positions in companies of size and complexity comparable to this business unit within Raymond James (“Fixed Income Peers”),

A third peer group that was considered in reference to compensation decisions for Mr. Trocin (our Co-President, Global Equities and Investment Banking), which included compensation information for similar positions in companies of size and complexity comparable to this business unit (“Equity Capital Markets Peers”), and

A fourth peer group that was considered in reference to compensation decisions for Mr. Zank (our chief operating officer), which included compensation information for similar positions in companies of size and complexity comparable to this business unit within Raymond James (“Brokerage Company Peers”).

~~The following table lists the companies that make up each of these peer groups:~~


Named Executive Officer	2022 Base Salary	Difference from Previous Year
Paul C. Reilly	$687,500	38%
Paul M. Shoukry	$450,000	50%
James E. Bunn	$450,000	50%
Scott A. Curtis	$450,000	50%
Tashtego S. Elwyn	$450,000	50%



~~Corporate Peers~~	~~Fixed Income Peers~~	~~Equity Capital Markets Peers~~	~~Brokerage Company Peers~~
~~Affiliated Managers Group~~	~~Fifth Third Bank~~	~~Evercore Partners Inc.~~	~~B. C. Ziegler & Co.~~
~~Ameriprise Financial Inc.~~	~~First Tennessee/First Horizon~~	~~FBR & Co.~~	~~Branch Banking & Trust Co.~~
~~Charles Schwab Corp.~~	~~Stifel~~	~~Guggenheim Partners~~	~~D.A. Davidson & Co.~~
~~E Trade Financial Corp.~~	~~Piper Jaffray~~	~~Janney Montgomery Scott Inc.~~	~~Hilliard Lyons~~
~~Edward Jones~~	~~Robert W Baird~~	~~Jefferies~~	~~Janney Montgomery Scott Inc.~~
~~Franklin Resources Inc.~~	~~Vining Sparks~~	~~JMP Group LLC~~	~~RBC Wealth Management~~
~~Invesco Ltd.~~	~~PNC~~	~~KeyCorp.~~	~~Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.~~
~~Lazard Ltd.~~	~~SunTrust~~	~~Leerink Partners~~	~~Southwest Securities~~
~~Legg Mason, Inc.~~	~~Wells Fargo~~	~~Macquarie Group Limited~~	~~Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.~~
~~Leucadia National Corp.~~		~~Moelis & Company~~
~~LPL Financial Holdings Inc.~~		~~Nomura Securities~~
~~Northern Trust Corp.~~		~~Keycorp/Pacific Crest~~
~~Robert W. Baird~~		~~Piper Jaffray~~
~~State Street Corp.~~		~~Robert W. Baird & Co.~~
~~Stifel Financial Corp.~~		~~SunTrust/Robinson Humphrey~~
~~T. Rowe Price Group Inc.~~
~~TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.~~

For its evaluation of 2017 compensation, the Committee - on the recommendation of its outside consultant - determined to revise the Corporate Peers used in the prior year by replacing Comerica with Affiliated Managers Group. The Committee made this change after determining that Comerica’s business mix was not well aligned with the company due to its heavy commercial and industrial loan focus, while Affiliated Managers Group met all of the selected industry and financial criteria.

~~Elements of Compensation~~

The Committee seeks to utilize a balanced mix of compensation elements to achieve its goals, with total compensation for our executive officers heavily weighted towards variable elements that reward performance. The following table describes each component of our executive compensation program, how it is determined, and the purpose or purposes we believe it accomplishes.



~~Compensation Type~~48			~~Pay Element~~

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Annual Bonus

With an executive compensation program that is variable in nature, annual bonus determination begins with the evaluation of Raymond James’ overall performance. In addition, each executive officer establishes performance goals at the start of each fiscal year that are evaluated throughout the year. These firm and individual factors are then measured both qualitatively and quantitatively and are ultimately used to determine compensation.

	~~How It Is Determined~~	~~What It Does~~
~~Fixed~~Performance Factors						~~Base Salary~~	➢	~~Varies with experience, duties and scope of responsibility~~	➢	~~Provides a base level of fixed pay~~Established Goals
Financial Achievement							➢	~~Internal and external market factors~~
			➢	~~Reviewed annually and adjusted effective at the beginning of each calendar year~~
~~Variable~~		~~Annual Bonus — Cash~~	➢	~~Based upon company’s annual financial~~ Generate record results ~~and progress against strategic objectives~~	➢	~~Provides a competitive annual incentive opportunity~~
			➢	~~Funded from a pool not to exceed 6% of consolidated~~ •Exceed budgeted net revenues •Exceed budgeted pre-tax income ~~with no individual bonus to exceed 3%~~
			➢	~~If annual bonus exceeds $275,000, a portion is delivered~~ •Exceed Adjusted ROE targets described in ~~the form of equity awards − see below~~
~~Variable~~		~~Annual Bonus — Equity~~	➢	~~If annual bonus exceeds $275,000, a variable portion of the amount above $250,000 is delivered in the form of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’)~~	➢	~~Aligns executive with shareholder interests~~
			➢	~~Equity proportion increases with size of bonus~~	➢	~~Encourages retention by vesting at end of 3-year period~~
			➢	~~One-half of RSUs vest on 3~~^rd ~~anniversary of grant~~
			➢	~~One-half of RSUs vest on 3~~^rd ~~anniversary of grant conditional on company~~ performance ~~- applies to grants since fiscal 2012~~
			➢	~~Performance vesting requires company to attain defined adjusted average after-tax return on equity (‘‘ROE’’) levels over the vesting period~~	➢	~~Performance vesting awards depend on company’s achievement of ROE thresholds, thus further aligning executive with shareholder interests~~
			➢	~~Vesting formula ranges between 0% of award for ROE <6% to 150% of award for ROE ≥ 18%~~
~~Variable~~		~~Retention Awards - RSUs~~	➢	~~Annual~~ RSU ~~grants to executives are based on retention needs~~	➢	~~Aligns executive with shareholder interests~~
			➢	~~Grant amounts tend to be based on executive level~~	➢	~~Encourages retention by vesting 60% on 3~~^rd ~~anniversary, and 20% on each of 4~~^th ~~and 5~~^th ~~anniversaries of grant date~~discussion
Business Growth										Continue to support organic growth •Maintain active corporate development effort •Support integration and onboarding of acquisitions •Grow market share organically in each core business •Develop and execute long-term growth strategies
~~Variable~~			Operating Efficiency	~~Retirement Plan~~Balance expense management with high service levels ~~Contributions —~~•Evaluate and advance progress on strategic expense management initiatives						•Maintain respective business unit compensation ratio to net revenues at budgeted levels
General Management			l People management •Coach and mentor senior leaders to continue to have strong leadership succession across all business units •Continuously reinforce the firm’s values and culture •Continue focus on increasing diversity across the firm (especially at senior management level) •Relentlessly manage risks within the tolerances approved by the Board •Maintain strong relationships with all regulators

	~~Profit Sharing Plan~~	➢	~~Contributions to Profit Sharing, ESOP and LTIP determined annually based on company performance~~	➢	~~Profit Sharing, ESOP and LTIP align executive with shareholder interests since they are funded based on company financial results~~
2023 PROXY STATEMENT			l			~~Employee Stock Ownership Plan (‘‘ESOP’’)~~	➢	~~Profit Sharing and ESOP are company-funded qualified retirement plans covering all associates~~
	l	~~Long Term Incentive~~ ~~Plan (‘‘LTIP’’)~~	➢	~~LTIP is a non-qualified, company-funded retention plan for highly compensated employees which relates to earnings in excess of qualified plan compensation limits~~	➢	~~LTIP encourages retention by vesting at end of five-year period~~
	l	~~401(k) Plan~~	➢	~~Modest matching of employee contributions into 401(k) Plan~~	➢	~~401(k) facilitates tax-advantaged retirement savings~~49

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

~~Changes to our~~Use of Equity Compensation ~~Practices for 2017~~

We ~~made the following change to our compensation practices:~~

•~~Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) Vesting Thresholds for Performance RSUs~~ ~~- We defer~~deliver a substantial portion of ~~annual bonus amounts for our executive officers~~incentive compensation in the form of equity ~~awards. Such~~awards — generally RSUs — a portion of which will vest based on future performance of the company. The Committee believes that delivering equity aligns employee interests with those of shareholders and helps motivate executives to achieve financial and strategic goals within the bounds of the company’s risk tolerance levels. These awards ~~take~~are also subject to cancellation and clawback over a multi-year period.

Awards to CEO. The annual bonus for our CEO is delivered 50% in cash and 50% in the form of RSUs. 60% of the portion paid in RSUs ~~50%~~will vest on the third anniversary of ~~which vest~~the grant only if the company ~~achieves~~attains certain ~~adjusted~~defined average ~~after-tax~~Adjusted ROE(1) levels (“performance RSUs” or “PRSUs”). As noted above, commencing with the 2021 grants, the portion of PRSUs that vests will be further subject to modification (increase or decrease) based on the company’s rTSR, as further described herein. The remaining 40% of the portion paid in RSUs will vest on the third anniversary of grant.

Awards to Other Executive Officers. Where the annual bonus of one of our other executive officers (including NEOs) exceeds $275,000, a variable portion of the amount over a$250,000 is similarly delivered in RSUs. The proportion of bonus delivered in RSUs increases with the size of the bonus. Specifically, for each portion of the bonus that falls within the dollar parameters set forth in the following table, the indicated percentage is delivered in RSUs, with the balance delivered in cash:


Segment of Annual Bonus				Portion in RSUs	Portion in Cash
	$250,000	–	$500,000	10%	90%
	$500,001	–	$1,000,000	15%	85%
	$1,000,001	–	$2,000,000	20%	80%
	$2,000,001	–	$3,000,000	25%	75%
	Above $3,000,000			50%	50%

Of the RSUs delivered to such other executive officers, 50% are performance RSUs that will vest on the third anniversary of the grant only if the company attains certain defined average Adjusted ROE(1) levels. The three-year ~~measurement period. With respect~~average Adjusted ROE(1) is calculated by adding Adjusted ROE(1) for each of the years included in the applicable vesting period and dividing by three. Commencing with the 2021 awards, the amount vesting is further subject to ~~grants~~modification (increases or decreases) based on the company’s rTSR, as further described herein. The remaining 50% of these RSUs vest on the third anniversary of grant.

Performance RSU Vesting Based on Adjusted ROE(1) with rTSR Adjustment

Historically, the Committee chose Adjusted ROE(1) as its core metric to determine performance RSU vesting because it believes it is an appropriate indicator of the return the company is delivering on common shareholders’ equity, since it reflects both bottom-line profitability and the manner in which the company is managing shareholders’ equity to generate such profitability. The Committee determines the appropriate Adjusted ROE(1) vesting scale for ~~fiscal 2017, we raised~~ the ~~adjusted ROE~~grant of each year’s performance ~~levels required for attaining the vesting percentages, which range from 0% to~~RSUs. The performance RSUs will vest — if at all — in an amount that falls between 50% and 150% of the stated target ~~RSU grant. (For example,~~for the ~~adjusted~~award, depending on the company’s average Adjusted ROE ~~that~~(1) for the applicable measurement period.

At the time of grant, the Committee may positively or negatively adjust the average Adjusted ROE(1) vesting scale for a particular grant year in order to reflect equity, interest rate and credit market conditions, as well as other factors outside the control of the company, must achieve in order for 100% of such RSUs to vest was increased from 11% to 12%. Similarly, the adjusted ROE required for threshold and maximum vesting levels was increased from 5% to 6%, and from 17% to 18%, respectively.) We adjust these performance targets periodically to reflect market conditions and to ensure that vesting of these awards ~~to our executive officers~~ remains a challenge but is reasonably attainable considering our Board’s commitment to maintaining conservative capital levels. The Committee does not adjust the vesting scales after the grant date for our performance RSUs.

~~Our Compensation Practices~~

~~We describe below certain~~Commencing with the 2021 awards, the vesting result determined by average Adjusted ROE(1) performance is subject to increase or decrease of ~~our executive compensation practices that we believe serve~~up to align our executives’ pay with company performance and their individual performance, promote good corporate governance, and serve our shareholders’ long-term interests. Following this information is a list of certain disfavored compensation practices that we avoid.

~~What We Do~~

þ ~~Pay for performance.~~ ~~We award annual variable compensation~~20% based on the ~~performance~~company’s rTSR ranked on a percentile basis compared to a defined peer group of the company and the individual. The great majority of our executive officers’ compensation is variable and not guaranteed. Base salaries for our named executive officers constitute — on average — approximately 7% of their total annual compensation.

þ ~~Use deferred compensation.~~ Variable compensation for our executive officers also includes a deferred component, in that a portion of annual bonuses (‘‘stock bonus awards’’) is delivered in the form of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’).

þ ~~Performance-based equity awards.~~ ~~The vesting of fifty percent (50%) of the RSUs awarded to our executive officers as stock bonus awards is tied to the achievement of defined adjusted average after-tax return on equity levels~~companies over a three-year measurement ~~period. For more information regarding equity~~period (the “rTSR Adjustment”).

The rTSR peer group consists of companies with which Raymond James competes for talent and shareholder capital, and may be adjusted by the Committee from time to time for a particular grant of PRSUs in accordance with pre-established guidelines. The peer group for the 2023 PRSU awards ~~see~~is identical to the peer group used for Mr. Reilly, our Chair and CEO, as set forth in the section ~~below~~ entitled ‘‘“Peer Group Comparisons” (but will not include privately held Edward Jones). In order to smooth potential anomalies of spot pricing, rTSR will be calculated based on the 20 trading day average price of the company’s (and each peer company’s) common stock as of the starting and ending of the measurement period, and will assume reinvestment of dividends and other distributions.

The Committee believes that the rTSR Adjustment even further enhances the strong alignment of our long-term executive compensation with the interests of our shareholders. Utilizing Adjusted ROE~~Compensation Framework — Policies~~(1) as the primary driver of these rewards allows executives to focus on measures they have direct influence on, while the rTSR Adjustment recognizes factors that affect our industry and ~~Process.’’~~peers as a whole, thus providing an enhanced tie to the shareholder investment experience.

þ (1)~~Long~~Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.


50

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Vesting of 2019 Awards

The three-year average Adjusted ROE(1) performance with respect to the 2019 awards was 16.7%, resulting in vesting ~~periods.~~ of 127% of the target amount.

Grant of 2022 Awards

For grants made in respect of fiscal 2022 performance, the Committee determined the following vesting formula (with results to be interpolated as necessary).


Adjusted ROE(1) - three-year average			RSU Vesting Percentage
≥20%			150%
18%			125%
15%			100%
12%			75%
10%			50%
<10%			0%

The vesting result determined by three-year average Adjusted ROE~~Both~~(1) performance will then be subject to modification, increase or decrease, of up to 20%, by the company’s rTSR compared to the peer group, with results to be interpolated between values:


Company rTSR Percentile Ranking		Adjustment to ROE Result
≥	75th%	120%
=	50th%	100%
≤	25th%	80%

(1)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measures. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and other required disclosures.

CEO Special One-Time Equity Retention Award

As previously reported, the Compensation and Talent Committee approved a grant to Chair and Chief Executive Officer Paul C. Reilly of a special one-time equity retention award, effective December 15, 2022, with a grant date fair value at target of $15 million.

In accordance with the Board’s succession planning process for the CEO, during the vesting period of the award Mr. Reilly will continue to prepare internal candidates from whom the Board may select the Company’s next CEO. During this time Mr. Reilly may also begin a transition to Executive Chair. The award is intended to incentivize Mr. Reilly to continue service with the Company and to execute the Board’s plan for a successful transition of the CEO role.

The Committee determined that granting this special one-time equity retention award is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and that the amount and terms of the award described herein were appropriate. Among other things, the Committee considered Mr. Reilly’s long track record of strong performance and the importance of his navigating the Company through a smooth CEO transition in accordance with the Board’s succession plan. The Committee also conducted an extensive market analysis with the assistance of the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Committee determined that the structure of the award was consistent with the outstanding equity elements of Mr. Reilly’s regular annual compensation and was aligned with the Company’s overall executive equity compensation program. As the award is a special one-time equity retention award, it is not part of Mr. Reilly’s regular annual compensation.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			51

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

In approving the special one-time equity retention award, the Committee noted that under Mr. Reilly’s leadership the Company has delivered record results and further enhanced its capabilities to serve the most sophisticated financial needs of its advisors and their clients. Specifically, during Mr. Reilly’s 12-year tenure, the Company has:

•Grown its market capitalization from $3.2 billion as of September 30, 2010 to $21.3 billion as of September 30, 2022 (a 17% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”))

•Increased annual net revenues from $2.9 billion in fiscal 2010 to $11.0 billion in fiscal 2022, a 12% CAGR

•Increased pre-tax income from $362 million in fiscal 2010 to $2.0 billion in fiscal 2022, a 15% CAGR

•Achieved a 533% TSR from May 3, 2010 through September 30, 2022 that is more than double the average TSR of the reference peer group of 197% and the TSR of the S&P 500 Index(1) of 221% during the same period(2)

•Deployed capital prudently by completing approximately 20 acquisitions, which have strengthened our capabilities to achieve future growth

The special one-time equity retention award consisted of both performance-vesting and time-vesting RSUs under the 2012 Plan and ~~performance-vesting portions~~had the following characteristics:

•Sixty percent (60%) of ~~our stock bonus~~the award consisted of PRSUs that will vest, if at all, based on the Company’s average Adjusted ROE(3), in accordance with the above scale for awards ~~generally~~granted in fiscal year 2023, as further modified by the rTSR Adjustment

•Forty percent (40%) of the award consisted of time-based RSUs that will vest on ~~a cliff basis three years after~~the third anniversary of the grant date. ~~Both~~

•The award will vest on December 15, 2025.

To enhance its retentive effect, the special one-time equity retention award was made subject to continued service requirements that are more restrictive than those applicable to our ~~outstanding legacy stock options and~~standard retention awards. Specifically, the ~~retention RSUs~~special equity award is subject to forfeiture in its entirety if Mr. Reilly’s service terminates during the vesting period by reason of retirement or voluntary termination without Good Reason.

In addition, with ~~which we have replaced them generally vest 60% on~~respect to the 3^rd ~~anniversary, and 20% on each~~period prior to a Change in Control or a Corporate Transaction, the definition in the Plan of “Good Reason” was modified for purposes of the 4award to mean the appointment of Mr. Reilly, within two years of the award’s grant date, to a position other than the Company’s CEO.

This description of the special one-time equity award is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by the respective terms of the Forms of Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with Mr. Reilly, for PRSUs and for time-based RSUs, copies of which were filed as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively, to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 19, 2022, and which are incorporated by reference herein.

Compensation and Risk

The Board, with the assistance of the Committee, has evaluated our compensation policies and practices for all employees. Specifically:

•^thAt the direction of the Committee, an independent compensation consultant partners with our Enterprise Risk Management and 5^th ~~anniversaries,~~Human Resources functions to conduct an independent assessment of ~~their grant dates. In addition, each award under our LTIP,a non-qualified, company-funded retention plan for highly compensated employees, vests only at~~ the ~~end of a five-year period.~~material incentive compensation plans across the organization every other year.

þ •~~‘‘Clawback’’ policy.~~ This process begins with an objective evaluation of job functions, assessing the level of risk influence across six specific categories: credit, liquidity, market, operational, legal & compliance and reputational.

•~~We maintain a robust compensation recoupment (or ‘‘clawback’’) policy, which permits~~Incentive plans for job functions that were identified as having the potential to expose the company to ~~recover compensation in~~ the ~~event~~highest level of ~~financial restatement, inaccurate~~risk are further reviewed across a consistent framework to identify potential operational plan risks of the incentive design.

•The incentive design evaluation focuses on key elements of the plan design, including: (i) performance measures, (ii) funding, (iii) performance period and ~~serious misconduct~~pay mix, (iv) goal setting, (v) leverage and (vi) controls and processes.

•In alternating years, Human Resources conducts an updating review with a focus on:

•any material changes to executive and associate incentive plans

•adoption of any new incentive plans or ~~materially imprudent judgment that~~inclusion of new roles therein

•review of any acquired company compensation plans and roles

(1) S&P 500 index results ~~in material financial or reputational harm~~are market-capitalization weighted.

(2) Data provided by Pay Governance LLC from Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ database. TSR is based on a 20-day trading average beginning and ending adjusted share price for the periods as of May 3, 2010 and September 30, 2022.

(3) Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the ~~company.~~most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.

þ ~~Stock ownership guidelines.~~ ~~We maintain stock ownership requirements for~~


52

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The most recent bi-annual review noted that our ~~executive officers, creating a further link between management interests, company performance and shareholder value. All~~practices of ~~our named executive officers have reached or exceeded the ownership requirements.~~

þ ~~‘‘Double triggers.’’~~ ~~Our award agreements for RSUs issued since 2010 generally maintain the requirement of ‘‘double triggers’’ on the accelerated vesting of awards in the event~~requiring deferral of a ~~change in control, meaning that an executive must actually be terminated following the change in control before vesting will be accelerated.~~

þ ~~Modest perquisites.~~ ~~We provide very modest perquisites that provide~~portion of bonus amounts into a ~~sound benefit to the company’s business.~~

~~What We Don’t Do~~

x ~~No long-term employment agreements.~~ ~~Our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are employed by us on an ‘‘at will’’ basis~~mix of time- and ~~do not have any special arrangements for severance payments following termination.~~

x ~~No dividends on unearned performance-based awards.~~ ~~We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on performance-based awards during the vesting period. Rather, dividends are deferred and will be paid based on performance achieved, with no premiums.~~

x ~~No ‘‘gross ups.’’~~ ~~We do not generally provide excise tax ‘‘gross ups,’’ other than~~— in the case of ~~certain relocation expenses, consistent~~executive officers — performance-vesting equity awards, our robust share ownership guidelines, our compensation recoupment policy and our prohibition on hedging by executives all serve to further mitigate risk in our compensation plans.

The review concluded that none of the company’s incentive plans were likely to motivate behavior that would result in a material adverse impact to the company. The potential residual risks identified through the process were determined to be effectively mitigated through established risk controls, leadership oversight, and our culture of proactive risk management.

After reviewing an update to the above review, our Board has concluded that our compensation policies in general, and our incentive programs in particular, remain well aligned with the interests of our ~~relocation policy.~~shareholders and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the company.

Other Benefits

Profit Sharing Plan. The Profit Sharing Plan is designed to offer associates a means of sharing in the firm’s success on a long-term basis. Each year, Raymond James may contribute a portion of its profits, upon approval by the Board of Directors, to each participant’s account based on the individual’s qualified fiscal year compensation and length of service. Contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan are 100% employer-funded.

xEmployee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). ~~No short selling or use~~The ESOP is designed to provide retirement benefits to our associates through participation in the ownership of ~~derivatives.~~ ~~Our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers from short selling or dealing~~the company. Assets of this plan are invested in ~~publicly-traded options in our~~ common ~~stock.~~stock of Raymond James Financial and are 100% employer-funded. The firm’s discretionary contribution to each participant’s account, upon approval by the Board of Directors, is based on the individual’s qualified fiscal year compensation.

x 401(k) Plan.~~No pledging~~ The 401(k) Plan is designed to help associates reach their personal savings objectives, with an opportunity to earn additional contributions from Raymond James through a match. For eligible employees, Raymond James will match 75% of the first $1,000 they contribute to their account, followed by ~~insiders.~~ ~~Our directors and executive officers have no shares held in margin accounts or pledged to third parties. The company maintains~~ a ~~policy under which such individuals are prohibited from pledging our common stock, subject to any exception granted for a non-margin pledge upon special application.~~25% match of the next $1,000 they contribute.

x Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).~~No option re-pricing.~~ The LTIP is a company-sponsored, unfunded, deferred compensation plan designed to award incentive compensation to a select group of management and/or highly compensated employees. The amount to be contributed is discretionary and shall be determined annually the Board of Directors or its delegate~~Our equity incentive plans contain certain provisions prohibiting option re-pricing absent approval of our shareholders.~~.

x ~~No option backdating or ‘‘spring-loading.’’~~ We do not backdate options or grant options retroactively. In addition, we do not coordinate grants of options so that they are made before announcement of favorable information, or after announcement of unfavorable information. Options for our stock are granted at fair market value on a fixed date or event, with all required approvals obtained in advance of or on the actual grant date.

~~2017~~2022 Compensation Decisions

At the start of each fiscal year, following recommendation by our chair and CEO, each executive officer establishes key business goals and priorities, and aligns these goals to our Raymond James Core Values: Client First, Conservatism, Independence and Integrity. The key business goals include the following areas of focus: financial achievement, business growth, operational efficiency and general management. The Committee reviews and approves goals and performance priorities. The Committee does not utilize formulaic financial performance goals or targets, and performance metrics are not assigned any specific weighting for purposes of determining the compensation awarded to the CEO or other NEOs.

With an executive compensation program that is variable in nature, annual bonus determination begins with the evaluation of Raymond James’ overall firm and business unit performance, assessment of key business goals and priorities and individual contribution. These performance factors are measured both qualitatively and quantitatively and are used to determine annual compensation.

In November ~~2017,~~2022, our ~~chairman~~chair and chief executive officer, Mr. Reilly, evaluated the performance of the company and the individual performance of each executive officer, including the ~~named executive officers,~~NEOs, against ~~previously-determined~~previously determined individual goals. ~~After consultation with Mr. James,~~ Mr. Reilly made recommendations to the Committee as to the amounts of annual bonus and retention ~~restricted stock units~~RSUs to be awarded each ~~named~~ executive officer (other than himself). The Committee reviewed and discussed such recommendations, as well as ~~certain~~ market data provided by its compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, with respect to the compensation of the named executive officers. Similarly, Mr. James reviewed with the Committee the performance of Mr. Reilly and discussed his recommendations for Mr. Reilly’s compensation.consultant. The Committee evaluated the performance of Mr. Reilly and each of our other ~~named executive officers~~NEOs in light of all the above information. It then reviewed such information with the other non-executive directors, who engaged with the Committee in a thorough evaluation of the performance of Mr. Reilly and our other NEOs. Following such evaluations, the Committee approved the compensation ~~of each, as further~~ described below.

~~Target Compensation for 2017~~

The Committee sets annual compensation targets for our executive officers. The 2017 compensation targets were based upon historical compensation, financial industry surveys and fiscal 2017 budget projections. The fiscal year 2017 bonus targets were as follows:

Named Executive Officer 2017 Bonus Target
Paul C. Reilly $ 7,000,000
Jeffrey P. Julien $ 1,900,000
John C. Carson, Jr. $ 2,600,000
Jeffrey E. Trocin $ 2,800,000
Dennis W. Zank $ 2,700,000

Upon setting the targets, the Committee also stipulated that annual bonuses would be funded from a pool equal to 6% of consolidated pre-tax income, with no individual bonus to exceed 3% of such measure.

Individual Performance for ~~2017~~2022

Set forth below is a summary of the material accomplishments ~~for 2017~~ of each ~~named executive officer,~~NEO and other important factors relevant to fiscal 2022, grouped by the areas of focus determined by the Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year, ~~and~~ which the Committee considered in exercising its discretion to award compensation for ~~2017. The~~2022.

After considering the fiscal 2022 performance of the company and the individual performance factors associated with the specific areas of focus outlined below, the Committee awarded each named executive officer ~~an annual~~the bonus and other compensation in the ~~amount~~amounts indicated.



~~Paul C. Reilly, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer —~~2023 PROXY STATEMENT			~~2017 Annual Bonus: $9,500,000~~53

The Committee reviewed Mr. Reilly’s achievements during the course of fiscal 2017, including the facts that, with respect to financial performance: the company achieved record net revenues of $6.4 billion and pre-tax income of $925 million (adjusted pre-tax income: $1.1 billion⁽¹⁾~~), once again ending the year with record client assets under administration ($693 billion); the company achieved a 14.5% pre-tax margin (adjusted pre-tax margin of 17.6%~~⁽¹⁾~~); all four of the company’s core segments achieved record revenues and record pre-tax income; the company achieved a 12.2% return~~

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on ~~equity (adjusted return on equity:14.5%~~⁽¹⁾) while continuing to maintain conservative levels of capital and liquidity. In addition, the Committee reviewed Mr. Reilly’s leadership relating to strategic and operational matters, including the execution of an agreement to acquire the Scout/Reams business, which significantly enhanced the company’s Carillon Tower Advisers unit; the company having a very strong recruiting year in the Private Client Group segment while keeping regrettable attrition to less than 1%, helping contribute to a net addition of 200 advisors to reach a record 7,346 advisors; Raymond James Bank growing net loans 12% to a record $17.0 billion; the company proactively managing its liquidity and capital by successfully redeeming two higher-cost senior notes issues and conducting a re-opening of its offering of 30-year senior notes on attractive terms; significantly advancing compliance efforts in connection with the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule; overseeing the effective expansion of the Compliance and Supervision functions, including key leadership hires; and continuing to develop robust succession planning and leadership development for the top professionals at the firm.

Executive Compensation



~~Jeffrey P. Julien, Chief Financial Officer —~~			~~2017 Annual Bonus: $2,400,000~~

The Committee reviewed Mr. Julien’s achievements during the course of fiscal 2017, and noted that, with respect to financial performance: the company achieved record net revenues of $6.4 billion and pre-tax income of $925 million (adjusted pre-tax income: $1.1 billion⁽¹⁾~~); the company generated a 12.2% return on equity (adjusted return on equity: 14.5%~~⁽¹⁾) despite elevated legal/regulatory expenses; the company maintained a firm-wide ratio of compensation to net revenues below targeted limits; the company also maintained conservative levels of capital and liquidity throughout the fiscal year; the company further achieved an upgrade in its credit ratings from both S&P and Moody’s; and Raymond James Bank, where Mr. Julien serves as Chairman, exceeded budgeted revenues and pre-tax income, achieved net loan growth of 12%, and once again achieved a return on equity exceeding that of the overall firm. The Committee also noted Mr. Julien’s accomplishments of strategic and operational goals, including that he: materially contributed to the ongoing Alex. Brown integration effort, as well as the acquisition of Scout/Reams; continued improving the Company’s relationships and dialogue with analysts, investors, rating agencies and regulators; led capital and liquidity planning efforts, including redeeming two higher-cost senior notes issues and conducting an additional successful offering of senior notes at attractive rates; oversaw

a successful transition of leadership of the treasury function; continuously monitored the Company’s key financial metrics to ensure compliance with Board-approved tolerances; and continued as a valued advisor to the Chief Executive Officer.


Paul C. Reilly Chair and CEO
~~John C. Carson, Jr.~~ 2022 Contributions Financial Achievement Produced record results across almost every business segment. •Record net revenue of $11 billion, up 13% over fiscal 2021 •Record pre-tax income of $2 billion, up 13% over fiscal 2021 •Return on common equity of 17.0% and adjusted return on common equity (1) of 18.2% for the fiscal year Business Growth Achieved record net revenues in the Private Client Group, Asset Management and Bank segments, and record pre-tax income in the Private Client Group segment in fiscal 2022. The Capital Markets segment generated its second-best annual revenues and pre-tax income, after the record year in fiscal 2021. •Record mergers & acquisitions and advisory revenues for the fiscal year •Assets under administration of $1.09 trillion at fiscal year end •Private Client Group assets in fee-based accounts of $586 billion at fiscal year end •Record net loans in the Bank segment of $43.2 billion, up 73% over fiscal 2021, reflecting the positive impact of the acquisition of TriState Capital Bank, as well as strong loan growth at Raymond James Bank •Domestic Private Client Group net new assets of approximately $95 billion during fiscal 2022, representing 9% of domestic Private Client Group assets at the beginning of the fiscal year Drove business growth through the retention and recruitment of financial advisors and investment bankers, as well as strategic acquisitions. •Net increase of 199 financial advisors during fiscal 2022 to 8,681 total financial advisors •Recruited financial advisors to the domestic independent contractor and employee affiliation options with nearly $320 million of trailing 12-month production and approximately $43 billion dollars of clients assets at their previous firms •Successfully closed three acquisitions during the fiscal year Operating Efficiency •Disciplined management of expenses during a very strong growth period, as well as rising labor and other costs, delivering a pre-tax margin of 18.4% during the fiscal year •Total compensation ratio of 66.6%, ~~President —~~			~~2017 Annual Bonus: $2,650,000~~90 basis points lower than fiscal 2021 General Management •Strong leadership resulting in stable associate engagement, robust focus on managing risk and regulatory compliance, and stability of core systems, all of which are necessary to grow the business •Solid progress on the company’s long-term diversity and inclusion strategy •Launched formal governance structure to oversee the firm’s ESG initiatives Compensation: The Committee approved an annual bonus for 2022 of $ 17,012,500

The Committee reviewed Mr. Carson’s achievements during the course of fiscal 2017, and noted that, with respect to financial performance: despite market headwinds, the Fixed Income businesses generated net revenues and pre-tax income that were only marginally under targets; the Public Finance business, which exceeded goals in both total revenues and pre-tax income, continued to generate satisfactory results; Mr. Carson continued to drive expansion of the Public Finance business in California and the Midwest, and improved certain European business operations; under his leadership, the Fixed Income and Public Finance businesses generated satisfactory margins in view of the difficult market environment; and he successfully managed productivity and controlled expenses. The Committee also noted the following strategic/operational achievements: he successfully oversaw the company’s Corporate Development function, leading the negotiations for the agreement to acquire Scout/Reams; he continued to develop succession planning at several levels; and he successfully managed risks in the Fixed Income and Public Finance businesses.Compensation Mix



~~Jeffrey E. Trocin, Co-President, Global Equities and Investment Banking —~~	~~2017 Annual Bonus: $3,500,000~~

The Committee reviewed Mr. Trocin’s achievements during the course of fiscal 2017, and noted that: under his leadership, the Equity Capital Markets (ECM) division exceeded its net revenue and pre-tax income targets, each

(1)Adjusted ROE is a new record; ECM also exceeded its targets for revenue per banker, maintained a compensation ratio substantially below the targeted ceiling, and significantly increased the number of large M&A transactions advised, while expanding its overall market share; completed a number of key banker and other hires during the year; successfully reduced total research costs; and achieved orderly transitions in certain key leadership positions.



~~Dennis W. Zank, Chief Operating Officer —~~	~~2017 Annual Bonus: $3,250,000~~

The Committee reviewed Mr. Zank’s achievements during the course of fiscal 2017, and noted that he participated in leading the firm to achieve record net revenues of $6.4 billion and pre-tax income of $925 million (adjusted pre-tax income: $1.1 billion); stewarded the Private Client Group segment, generating record net revenues of $4.42 billion and pre-tax income of $373 million; and led work on expense efficiencies and cost containment measures across multiple businesses. Further, Mr. Zank accomplished the following strategic and/or operational objectives: he continued his significant involvement in the Private Client Group’s financial advisor recruiting process, leading the company to increase its net advisor count by 200 to a record 7,346 advisors; he continued making strong contributions to financial advisor retention, including continuing to lead the successful integration of the Alex. Brown leadership and advisors; he developed long-term growth strategies for the Private Client Group business and continued to mentor senior leaders and augment succession plans for core business functions within the company. Notwithstanding the above achievements, the Committee noted that Mr. Zank oversaw the business that experienced a $150 million legal settlement during the year, and - in view of such development - determined to marginally reduce the proposed amount of his 2017 bonus.

~~________________~~

~~(1) Adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted pre-tax margin, and adjusted return on equity are~~ non-GAAP ~~measures.~~measure. Please refer to ~~page 40~~Appendix A for a reconciliation of ~~our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, filed with the SEC on November 22, 2016, for reconciliations of these measures~~this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP ~~measures~~measure and other required disclosures.


54

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


Paul M. Shoukry CFO
			2022 Contributions Financial Achievement Supported the company in achieving strong results, including: •Record net revenue of $11 billion, up 13% over fiscal 2021 •Record pre-tax income of $2 billion, up 13% over fiscal 2021 •Return on common equity of 17.0% and adjusted return on common equity (1) of 18.2% for the fiscal year Business Growth •Led corporate development team to successfully close three acquisitions in fiscal 2022 •Provided leadership in identifying, negotiating and closing the acquisition of TriState Capital, oversaw integration efforts and supported growth •Partnered with leadership of Private Client Group and Raymond James Bank to effectively manage and implement continued enhancements to client cash offering Operating Efficiency •Exercised strong leadership of the firm’s expense management initiatives, especially on managing the firm’s compensation ratio and non-compensation expenses across all business segments •Provided strong management of financial risk targets General Management •Managed all aspects of capital and liquidity planning, including achieving tier 1 leverage ratio target of 10%; maintained cash balances well above target •Provided strong leadership of diversity and inclusion efforts, including serving as executive sponsor of Mosaic, the firm’s multicultural inclusion network, and establishing a partnership with the National Association of Black Accountants •Assumed oversight responsibilities for the firm’s ESG initiatives Compensation: The Committee approved an annual bonus for 2022 of $4,300,000

Compensation Mix

(1)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			55

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


James E. Bunn President of Global Equities and Investment Banking
			2022 Contributions Financial Achievement •Led Global Equities and Investment Banking (“GEIB”) business unit, included in our Capital Markets segment, to its second-best year following the record set in fiscal 2021 •Achieved record mergers & acquisitions and advisory revenues Business Growth •Integrated two businesses acquired in the prior year, Financo and Cebile Capital, to the investment banking platform •Continued to make strategic additions to the GEIB team by hiring several managing directors Operating Efficiency •Disciplined focus on expense management, resulting in strong pre-tax margin for the business unit General Management •Energetic engagement with investment banking leadership that led to positive retention results despite a very competitive market •Led GEIB diversity and inclusion efforts that resulted in strong lateral recruitment, such that two of GEIB’s top six investment banking revenue producers are women Compensation: The Committee approved an annual bonus for 2022 of $6,500,000

Compensation Mix


Scott A. Curtis President of Private Client Group
			2022 Contributions Financial Achievement Achieved record revenues and pre-tax income for the Private Client Group segment Business Growth •Private Client Group assets under administration of $1.04 trillion at fiscal year end •Private Client Group assets in fee-based accounts of $586 billion at fiscal year end •Domestic Private Client Group net new assets of approximately $95 billion during fiscal 2022, representing 9% of domestic Private Client Group assets at the beginning of the fiscal year •Achieved significant progress in strengthening the RIA and Custodial Services platform Operating Efficiency •Exercised prudent management of expenses while continuing to grow the business •Maintained compensation ratio below 77% for the segment, despite increasingly challenging competitive environment General Management Implemented new framework for Super Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction ("OSJ") affiliation , including adjusting client pricing to improve margins while maintaining growth Compensation: The Committee approved an annual bonus for 2022 of $4,000,000

Compensation Mix


56

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


Tashtego S. Elwyn President and Chief Executive Officer of Raymond James and Associates
			2022 Contributions Financial Achievement Achieved strong revenues and pre-tax income for the Private Client Group domestic employee affiliation option Business Growth Led robust financial advisor recruitment to the domestic employee affiliation option Operating Efficiency Maintained an intense focus on expense management, in particular administrative expenses and advisor compensation expenses General Management •Assumed leadership of the Alex. Brown division •Continued to serve as executive sponsor of the firm’s diversity, equity, and inclusion advisory council •Assumed position of executive director on the Charles Stanley Company Board of Directors Compensation: The Committee approved an annual bonus for 2022 of $3,750,000

Compensation Mix


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			57

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Annual Direct Compensation for ~~2017~~2022

After assessing the company’s financial and strategic performance for fiscal ~~2017,~~2022 and ~~after further~~ evaluating the individual performance of our ~~named executive officers, as described above,~~NEOs, the Committee exercised its discretion to award annual direct compensation for ~~2017 to our NEOs~~2022 as set forth in the following table.

~~The table below depicts how the Committee viewed its compensation decisions for our NEOs, but the presentation therein~~This Annual Direct Compensation Table differs ~~substantially~~ from the Summary Compensation Table ~~(‘‘SCT’’~~(“SCT”) on page ~~39 that is~~60 required by SEC ~~rules. The table below~~rules, and is not a substitute for the ~~information presented in the~~ SCT.

There are two ~~principal differences between the SCT and our Annual Direct Compensation Table:~~main differences:

~~The company grants both the cash~~•We grant annual bonuses (cash and equity ~~components of annual bonus~~components) after our ~~earnings for a performance~~fiscal year have been announced. In both the Annual Direct Compensation Table and the SCT, cash incentive compensation granted in fiscal 2018 for fiscal 2017 performance is shown as 2017 compensation. Our presentation below treats equity awards similarly, so that equityhas ended. Equity awards granted in fiscal ~~2018 for~~2023 to reward fiscal 2022 performance ~~in 2017~~ are therefore shown as ~~2017 compensation.~~2022 compensation in this Annual Direct Compensation Table. The SCT, ~~does not follow this treatment,~~ however, ~~and instead~~ reports ~~the value of~~ equity awards in the year ~~in which~~ they are granted, ~~rather than~~irrespective of the year ~~in which~~ they were earned. AsThis results in a ~~result,~~one-year lag between the time equity awards are granted and when they are reported in ~~fiscal 2018 for 2017 performance are shown in our presentation below as 2017 compensation, but~~ the ~~SCT reports as 2017 compensation the value of equity awards granted in 2017 in respect of 2016 performance.~~SCT.

•The SCT ~~reports ‘‘All~~contains a column reporting “All Other ~~Compensation.’’ These~~Compensation,” which amounts are not part of the Committee’s compensation determinations and are thus not shown in ~~the presentation below.~~this Annual Direct Compensation Table.

Name

Year
Annual Direct Compensation

Salary
Incentive Compensation

Total

Cash Bonus
Time Vesting Stock Bonus Awards⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Performance Vesting Stock Bonus
Awards^(1)(2)(3)
Time Vesting Stock Retention
Awards⁽²⁾⁽⁴⁾
Paul C. Reilly 2017 $ 486,250
$5,700,056 $ 1,900,015
$ 1,899,929
⁽⁵⁾
$ 1,103,750
$11,090,000
Chairman and Chief 2016 $ 445,000
$4,575,034 $ 1,337,519
$ 1,337,447
⁽⁶⁾
$ 719,400
$8,414,400
Executive Officer - RJF 2015 $ 445,000
$4,325,030 $ 1,212,514
$ 1,212,456
⁽⁷⁾
$ 573,000
$7,768,000
Jeffrey P. Julien 2017 $ 280,000
$2,000,070 $ 199,965
$ 199,965
⁽⁵⁾
$ 441,500
$3,121,500
Executive VP, Finance 2016 $ 280,000
$1,737,554 $ 156,259
$ 156,187
⁽⁶⁾
$ 359,700
$2,689,700
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer - RJF 2015 $ 278,750
$1,580,056 $ 135,001
$ 134,943
⁽⁷⁾
$ 286,500
$2,415,250
John C. Carson, Jr. 2017 $ 300,000
$2,187,516 $ 231,242
$ 231,242
⁽⁵⁾
$ 441,500
$3,391,500
President-RJF 2016 $ 300,000
$2,375,028 $ 262,486
$ 262,486
⁽⁶⁾
$ 359,700
$3,559,700
2015 $ 300,000
$2,150,016 $ 225,021
$ 224,963
⁽⁷⁾
$ 286,500
$3,186,500
Jeffrey E. Trocin 2017 $ 305,000
$2,700,053 $ 400,017
$ 399,930
⁽⁵⁾
$ 441,500
$4,246,500
Co-President, Global Equities 2016 $ 305,000
$1,620,000 $ 140,017
$ 139,944
⁽⁶⁾
$ 359,700
$2,564,661
and Investment Banking, RJA 2015 $ 305,000
$2,337,506 $ 256,247
$ 256,247
⁽⁷⁾
$ 286,500
$3,441,500
Dennis W. Zank 2017 $ 330,000
$2,575,074 $ 337,463
$ 337,463
⁽⁵⁾
$ 441,500
$4,021,500
Chief Operating Officer - RJF 2016 $ 330,000
$2,450,012 $ 275,030
$ 274,958
⁽⁶⁾
$ 359,700
$3,689,700

2015 $ 330,000
$2,300,044 $ 249,978
$ 249,978
⁽⁷⁾
$ 286,500
$3,416,500


				Incentive Compensation
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Cash Bonus		Time Vesting Stock Bonus Awards(1)(2)		Performance Vesting Stock Bonus Awards(1)(2)(3)			Time Vesting Stock Retention Awards(2)(4)			Total

Paul C. Reilly Chair and Chief Executive Officer	2022	$687,500		$8,506,292		$3,402,469		$5,103,758	(5)		$1,299,981	$19,000,000
	2021	$500,000		$7,100,062		$2,839,944		$4,260,012	(6)		$1,299,982	$16,000,000
	2020	$500,000		$4,700,054		$1,879,888		$2,819,863	(7)		$1,231,035	$11,130,840

Paul M. Shoukry Chief Financial Officer	2022	$450,000		$3,100,211		$600,033		$599,923	(5)		$1,599,832	$6,350,000
	2021	$300,000		$2,750,129		$425,028		$424,931	(6)		$1,099,912	$5,000,000
	2020	$281,250		$1,380,039		$110,051		$109,929	(7)		$741,450	$2,622,719

James E. Bunn President Global Equities and Investment Banking	2022	$450,000		$4,200,168		$1,150,000		$1,150,000	(5)		$1,599,832	$8,550,000
	2021	$300,000		$4,700,143		$1,400,017		$1,399,921	(6)		$2,199,919	$10,000,000
	2020	$300,000		$2,775,002		$437,521		$437,460	(7)		$473,475	$4,423,458

Scott A. Curtis President, Private Client Group	2022	$450,000		$2,950,116		$525,043		$524,933	(5)		$5,599,908	$10,050,000


Tashtego S. Elwyn President and Chief Executive Officer Raymond James and Associates	2022	$450,000		$2,825,174		$462,514		$462,404	(5)		$5,599,908	$9,800,000

~~__________________~~

~~(1)~~

~~Represents~~(1)Other than with respect to Mr. Reilly’s bonuses, represents the applicable portion of any annual bonus that exceeds $275,000 for each NEO that is delivered in the form of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’). Each RSU vests, if at all, on the third anniversary of the grant date. The proportion delivered in RSUs varies with the size of the annual bonus according to the formula presented on page 38 hereof.


~~(2)~~	Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive (i) one share of common stock and (ii) non-preferential dividend equivalents equal to the sum of any dividends on the shares of common stock underlying the RSU that were actually paid during the vesting period.

~~(3)~~

Represents 50% of the aggregate number of RSUs delivered as annual bonus, computed as described in footnote (1) to this table. RSUs reported in this column vest, if at all, contingent upon the company achieving certain defined adjusted average after-tax return on equity (‘‘ROE’’) levels over a 3-year measurement period, in accordance with the formula presented in footnote (16) to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2017 table.


~~(4)~~	~~Stock retention awards delivered in the form of RSUs. The RSUs vest 60% on the third, and 20% on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.~~

~~(5)~~

RSUs granted in fiscal year 2018 vest contingent upon the company achieving ROE over a vesting period consisting of fiscal years 2018 - 2020, as explained in footnote (3) above. The following amounts represent the maximum value at the grant date of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2018 for fiscal year 2017 performance: Mr. Reilly $2,849,894, Mr. Julien $299,948, Mr. Carson $346,863, Mr. Trocin $599,895 and Mr. Zank $506,195.

~~(6)~~

RSUs granted in fiscal year 2017 vest contingent upon the Company achieving ROE over a vesting period consisting of fiscal years 2017 - 2019, as explained in footnote (3) above. The following amounts represent the maximum value at the grant date of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2017 for fiscal year 2016 performance: Mr. Reilly $2,006,171, Mr. Julien $234,281, Mr. Carson $393,729, Mr. Trocin $209,916 and Mr. Zank $412,437.

~~(7)~~

RSUs granted in fiscal year 2016 vest contingent upon the company achieving ROE over a vesting period consisting of fiscal years 2016 - 2018, as explained in footnote (3) above. The following amounts represent the maximum value at the grant date of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2016 for fiscal year 2015 performance: Mr. Reilly $1,818,683, Mr. Julien $202,415, Mr. Carson $337,445, Mr. Trocin $384,370 and Mr. Zank $374,967.

~~Alignment of CEO Compensation with Total Shareholder Return~~

As noted above, the compensation of our chief executive officer is heavily weighted to variable incentive compensation that is linked to performance, and a significant portion of the annual bonus for our chief executive officer is delivered in the form of ~~restricted~~RSUs. The proportion delivered in RSUs varies with the size of the annual bonus according to the formula presented on page 50 hereof. Of Mr. Reilly’s total bonuses, 50% was delivered in cash and 50% in RSUs. Of Mr. Reilly’s RSUs, 40% were subject to time-vesting and 60% were subject to performance vesting. Each RSU vests, if at all, on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(2)Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive (i) one share of common stock ~~units.~~and (ii) non-preferential dividend equivalents equal to the sum of any dividends on the shares of common stock underlying the RSU that were actually paid during the vesting period.

(3)Represents the aggregate grant date value of RSUs delivered as annual bonus, computed as described in footnote (1) to this table. RSUs reported in this column vest, if at all, contingent upon the company achieving certain defined Adjusted ROE(8) levels over a three-year measurement period, in accordance with the formula presented in footnote 16 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2022 table, and, effective with the December 2021 grant, subject to increase or decrease by up to 20% depending on the rTSR Adjustment. See “Use of Equity Compensation” and footnote 8 below.

(4)Stock retention awards delivered in the form of RSUs. The RSUs vest 60% on the third, and 20% on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. For each of Mr. Curtis and Mr. Elwyn, $5,000,000 of the retention awards are structured such that a voluntary retirement by the grantee will result in forfeiture of the unvested portion of the award.

(5)RSUs granted in fiscal year 2023 vest contingent upon the company achieving average Adjusted ROE(8) over a vesting period consisting of fiscal years 2023 - 2025, as explained in footnote (3) above, subject to the rTSR Adjustment. The following ~~graph shows~~amounts represent the ~~total shareholder return on $100 invested in~~maximum value at the company’s stock on September 30, 2012, compared to total annual direct compensation of our chief executive officer for each year represented. We believe the graph demonstrates that our chief executive officer’s total compensation has generally correlated well to total shareholder return over the time periods indicated. (As previously disclosed, in making its 2015 compensation decisions, the Committee had determined that, in lightgrant date of the ~~company’s record performance~~RSUs granted in fiscal year 2023 for fiscal year 2022 performance: Mr. Reilly $9,186,765, Mr. Shoukry $1,079,862, Mr. Bunn $2,070,000, Mr. Curtis $944,879, and Mr. Elwyn $832,327 .

(6)RSUs granted in fiscal year 2022 vest contingent upon the company achieving average Adjusted ROE(8) over ~~recent~~a vesting period consisting of fiscal years ~~an upward adjustment was appropriate~~2022 - 2024, as explained in ~~order~~footnote (3) above, subject to ~~better align our chief executive officer’s compensation with that~~the rTSR Adjustment. The following amounts represent the maximum value at the grant date of the ~~companies constituting~~RSUs granted in fiscal year 2022 for fiscal year 2021 performance: Mr. Reilly $7,668,022, Mr. Shoukry $764,876 and Mr. Bunn $2,519,858.

(7)RSUs granted in fiscal year 2021 vest contingent upon the ~~Corporate Peers group.)~~company achieving average Adjusted ROE(8) over a vesting period consisting of fiscal years 2021 - 2023. The following amounts represent the maximum value at the grant date of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2021 for fiscal year 2020 performance: Mr. Reilly $4,229,795, Mr. Shoukry $164,894 and Mr. Bunn $656,190.

(8)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.

~~No Long-Term Employment Agreements~~


58

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Components of Total Direct Compensation

The following charts present the mix of compensation elements actually received for ~~Executive Officers~~

~~Our~~2022 performance by our CEO and our other named executive officers ~~including~~(average) (excluding retirement plan contributions):

Components of Total Direct Compensation — 2022 Actual


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			59

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2022

The following table sets forth information about compensation earned by our named executive officers during fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022 in accordance with SEC rules. The information presented below may be different from compensation information presented in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” since that section describes compensation decisions made with respect to the indicated fiscal year, regardless of when the compensation was actually paid or granted. For a more detailed explanation of the differences between the presentation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the table below, please see the note on page 58.


Name	Year	Salary		Bonus(1)		Stock Awards		(2)	All Other Compensation(3)		Total
Paul C. Reilly Chair and CEO	2022		$687,500		$8,506,292		$8,399,938	(4)		$465,386		$18,059,116
	2021		$500,000		$7,100,062		$5,930,786			$370,198		$13,901,046
	2020		$500,000		$4,700,054		$6,976,835			$272,470		$12,449,359
Paul M. Shoukry Chief Financial Officer	2022		$450,000		$3,100,211		$1,949,871	(5)		$44,160		$5,544,242
	2021		$300,000		$2,750,129		$693,455			$88,963		$3,832,547
	2020		$281,250		$1,380,039		$765,615			$57,081		$2,483,985
James E. Bunn President, Global Equities and Investment Banking	2022		$450,000		$4,200,168		$4,999,857	(6)		($32,812)		$9,617,213
	2021		$300,000		$4,700,143		$1,348,456			$301,112		$6,649,711
	2020		$300,000		$2,775,002		$1,640,676			$112,806		$4,828,484
Scott A. Curtis President, Private Client Group	2022		$450,000		$2,950,116		$1,199,920	(7)		$69,768		$4,669,804

Tashtego S. Elwyn President and Chief Executive Officer Raymond James & Associates	2022		$450,000		$2,825,174		$1,174,856	(8)		$218,861		$4,668,891

(1)The amounts disclosed in the Bonus column represent the annual cash bonus, as described in the CD&A, awarded to the NEOs.

(2)The amounts shown in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the NEOs in the fiscal year shown. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards under ASC Topic 718, see Note 2 to our financial statements in our Form 10-K report for the year ended September 30, 2022. For more information, see the Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal 2022 table below.

(3)See the All Other Compensation table below for a breakdown of these amounts.

(4)Includes 43,157 RSUs that vest over time and 44,191 RSUs that are ~~employed~~performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Reilly is $7,668,022.

(5)Includes 15,998 RSUs that vest over time and 4,408 RSUs that are performance vesting based awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Shoukry is $764,876.

(6)Includes 37,702 RSUs that vest over time and 14,522 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Bunn is $2,519,858.

(7)Includes 9,433 RSUs that vest over time and 3,112 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Curtis is $539,995.

(8)Includes 9,303 RSUs that vest over time and 2,982 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr.Elwyn is $517,437.


60

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

All Other Compensation Table for Fiscal 2022

The following table sets forth more detailed information concerning the items included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.


Name	Employee Stock Ownership Plan Contribution		Profit Sharing Contribution(1)		401(k) Company Match		Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution(2)		Deferred Compensation Plan Gain(2)		Accrued Dividends(3)		Commissions		Perquisites			Total All Other Compensation
Paul C. Reilly		$5,075		$13,562		$1,000		$33,900		($41,623)		$432,622		$—		$20,850	(4)		$465,386
Paul M. Shoukry		$5,075		$13,496		$1,000		$33,900		($26,518)		$17,207		$—		$—			$44,160
James E. Bunn		$5,075		$13,957		$1,000		$33,900		($192,174)		$87,175		$—		$18,255	(5)		($32,812)
Scott A. Curtis		$5,075		$14,022		$1,000		$33,900		($90,469)		$51,659		$4,763		$49,818	(6)		$69,768
Tashtego S. Elwyn		$5,075		$14,614		$1,000		$33,900		($41,623)		$48,349		$157,546		$—			$218,861

(1)The employer-funded profit sharing contribution is based on the length of service and fiscal-year compensation, capped at the IRS annual compensation limit.

(2)See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table for more information.

(3)Includes accrued dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs as of September 30, 2022.

(4)Consists of personal use of chartered aircraft for the executive officer, company-paid commercial airfare and meal expenses for spouse in connection with company-sponsored off-site business meetings, a ticket to a sporting event, car rental and private car service for the executive officer and spouse, and club dues. The Board authorized the personal use of company-paid aircraft by Mr. Reilly in response to the personal health risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic during fiscal years 2021 and 2022.

(5)Consists of company-paid commercial airfare, meal-related expenses, and ground transportation for spouse in conjunction with company-sponsored off-site business meetings.

(6)Consists of company-paid commercial airfare and meal-related expenses for spouse in conjunction with company-sponsored off-site business meetings. Company-paid travel expenses for spouse include approximately $32,000 in commercial airfare costs. The incremental cost of commercial airfare was determined based on the actual cost of tickets paid by the company to the airlines.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			61

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal 2022

The following table contains information concerning plan-based awards granted to each of the NEOs during fiscal 2022.


		Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)(2)
Name	Grant Date	Threshold(3)	Target(4)	Maximum(5)	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Units(1)(2)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(6)
Paul C. Reilly	12/15/2021	17,676	44,191	79,544				$4,260,012
	12/15/2021				29,460	(7)		$2,839,944
	12/2/2021				13,697	(8)		$1,299,982
Paul M. Shoukry	12/15/2021	1,763	4,408	7,934				$424,931
	12/15/2021				4,409	(7)		$425,028
	12/2/2021				11,589	(8)		$1,099,912
James E. Bunn	12/15/2021	5,809	14,522	26,140				$1,399,921
	12/15/2021				14,523	(7)		$1,400,017
	12/2/2021				23,179	(8)		$2,199,919
Scott A. Curtis	12/15/2021	1,245	3,112	5,602				$299,997
	12/15/2021				3,112	(7)		$299,997
	12/2/2021				6,321	(8)		$599,926
Tashtego S. Elwyn	12/15/2021	1,193	2,982	5,368				$287,465
	12/15/2021				2,982	(7)		$287,465
	12/2/2021				6,321	(8)		$599,926

(1)The “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns represent the minimum, target and maximum number of shares that could be received by each listed officer upon the vesting of RSUs, excluding dividend equivalents. RSUs vest based on the company’s three-year average Adjusted ROE(9) for fiscal years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as well as the company’s rTSR Percentile Ranking.

See footnote 16 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2022 table herein for more information.

(2)Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive (i) one share of common stock and (ii) non-preferential dividend equivalents equal to the sum of any dividends on the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs that were actually paid during the vesting period.

(3)Threshold is 40% of awarded RSUs if the three-year average Adjusted ROE(9) is at least equal to 9% and the company’s rTSR percentile is less than or equal to 25.

(4)Target is 100% of awarded RSUs if the three-year average Adjusted ROE(9) is equal to 13% and the company’s rTSR percentile equals to 50.

(5)Maximum is 180% of awarded RSUs if the three-year average Adjusted ROE(9) is 17% or more and the company’s rTSR percentile is more than or equal to 75.

(6)Reflects the grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards under ASC Topic 718, see Note 2 of our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.

(7)We deliver a portion of the annual bonus awarded to highly compensated employees in the form of RSUs (see the CD&A for more information). These RSUs vest approximately three years from the date of grant.

(8)We grant stock retention awards in the form of RSUs. These RSUs vest 60% on the third, and 20% on each of the fourth and fifth, anniversaries of the grant date.

(9)Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and other required disclosures.


62

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2022

The following table contains information as of September 30, 2022, about the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers.


	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested		Market Value of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested(2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested(1)
Paul C. Reilly	3,750	(3)		$370,575	87,156	(4)		$8,612,756
	38,736	(5)		$3,827,892	69,375	(6)		$6,855,638
	7,500	(7)		$741,150	79,544	(8)		$7,860,538
	30,833	(9)		$3,046,917
	18,750	(10)		$1,852,875
	29,460	(11)		$2,911,237
	19,500	(12)		$1,926,990
	13,697	(13)		$1,353,538
Paul M. Shoukry	900	(14)		$88,938	2,705	(6)		$267,308
	938	(5)		$92,693	7,934	(8)		$784,038
	1,800	(7)		$177,876
	1,805	(9)		$178,370
	7,500	(10)		$741,150
	4,500	(15)		$444,690
	4,409	(11)		$435,697
	7,500	(12)		$741,150
	11,589	(13)		$1,145,225
James E. Bunn	2,400	(3)		$237,168	14,835	(4)		$1,465,995
	9,890	(5)		$977,330	10,763	(6)		$1,063,600
	3,000	(7)		$296,460	26,140	(8)		$2,583,155
	7,176	(9)		$709,132
	7,500	(10)		$741,150
	14,523	(11)		$1,435,163
	7,500	(12)		$741,150
	23,179	(13)		$2,290,549
Scott A. Curtis	1,500	(3)		$148,230	5,408	(4)		$534,419
	3,606	(5)		$356,345	4,613	(6)		$455,857
	3,000	(7)		$296,460	5,602	(8)		$553,590
	3,075	(9)		$303,872
	7,500	(10)		$741,150
	3,112	(11)		$307,528
	7,500	(12)		$741,150
	6,321	(13)		$624,641


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			63

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested		Market Value of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested(2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested(1)
Tashtego S. Elwyn	1,500	(3)		$148,230	4,635	(4)		$458,031
	3,090	(5)		$305,354	4,152	(6)		$410,301
	3,000	(7)		$296,460	5,368	(8)		$530,466
	2,768	(9)		$273,534
	7,500	(10)		$741,150
	2,982	(11)		$294,681
	7,500	(12)		$741,150
	6,321	(13)		$624,641

(1)The market value of stock awards is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on September 30, 2022, which was $98.82.

(2)The number of units reported assumes that the award received by each NEO upon vesting is based upon achieving a three-year average Adjusted ROE and rTSR Percentile Ranking based on the thresholds disclosed in footnote (16) to this table. Adjusted ROE is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP measures for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022.

(3)The RSU award was granted on November 30, 2017 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(4)The RSU award was granted on December 13, 2019 and vests in three years from that date based on the Company’s three-year adjusted average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022. Represents the maximum of 150 percent of awarded RSUs given the adjusted average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022.

(5)The RSU award was granted on December 13, 2019 and cliff vests in three years from that date.

(6)The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2020 and vests in three years from that date based on the Company’s three-year average Adjusted ROE for fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023. Represents the maximum of 150 percent of awarded RSUs given the adjusted average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023.

(7)The RSU award was granted on November 29, 2018 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(8)The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2021 and vests in three years from that date based on the Company’s three-year average Adjusted ROE for fiscal years 2022, 2023, and 2024, as well as the company’s rTSR Percentile Ranking. Represents the maximum of 150 percent of awarded RSUs given the three-year average Adjusted ROE for fiscal years 2022, 2023, and 2024, as well as the maximum 120 percent rTSR Percentile Ranking.

(9)The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2020 and cliff vests in three years from that date.

(10)The RSU award was granted on November 22, 2019 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(11)The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2021 and cliff vests in three years from that date.

(12)The RSU award was granted on December 03, 2020 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(13)The RSU award was granted on December 02, 2021 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(14)The RSU award was granted on November 22, 2017 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(15)The RSU award was granted on December 12, 2019 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.

(16)Certain RSU’s Granted since 2017 vest on the 3rd anniversary of the grant only if the company attains certain three-year average Adjusted ROE levels. The vesting formulas are as follows, with results to be interpolated:

Awards Granted in Fiscal Year 2022


Adjusted ROE - three-year average	RSU Vesting Percentage
≥17%	150	%
15%	125	%
13%	100	%
11%	75	%
9%	50	%
<9%	0	%


Company rTSR Percentile Ranking	Adjustment to ROE Result
≥ 75th%	120	%
= 50th%	100	%
< 25th%	80	%


64

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Awards Granted in Fiscal Year 2021


Adjusted ROE - three-year average	RSU Vesting Percentage
≥17%	150	%
14%	125	%
12%	100	%
8%	75	%
5%	50	%
<5%	0	%

Awards Granted in Fiscal Years 2019 and 2020


Adjusted ROE - three-year average	RSU Vesting Percentage
≥19%	150	%
16%	125	%
13%	100	%
10%	75	%
7%	50	%
<7%	0	%

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2022

The following table provides information about stock options exercised by the NEOs during fiscal 2022 and RSU awards held by our NEOs that vested in fiscal 2022.


	Option Awards			Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise	Value Realized on Exercise(1)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting		Value Realized on Vesting(2)
Paul C. Reilly	—		$—	144,839	(3)		$14,559,473	(4)
Paul M. Shoukry	—		$—	5,216	(5)		$517,798	(6)
James E. Bunn	—		$—	28,637	(7)		$2,860,919	(8)
Scott A. Curtis	—		$—	16,510	(9)		$1,648,564	(10)
Tashtego S. Elwyn	—		$—	15,384	(11)		$1,535,948	(12)

(1)Amounts in this column reflect the difference between the market price on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options exercised, multiplied by the number of options exercised.

(2)The value of the shares on each respective vesting date using the closing market price for our common stock.

(3)After disposition of a portion of the shares subject to award back to the company to cover taxes, the net number of shares issued was 92,287.

(4)11,250 shares vested on November 29, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $100.57. 3,000 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 3,750 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 43,662 shares vested on December 14, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $96.40. 83,177 shares vested on January 03, 2022 when the closing price of our common stock was $102.86.

(5)After disposition of a portion of the shares subject to award back to the company to cover taxes, the net number of shares issued was 3,840.

(6)900 shares vested on November 22, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.64. 2,700 shares vested on November 29, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $100.57. 900 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 716 shares vested on December 14, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $96.40.

(7)After disposition of a portion of the shares subject to award back to the company to cover taxes, the net number of shares issued was 19,928.

(8)4,500 shares vested on November 29, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $100.57. 900 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 900 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 1,500 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 9,179 shares vested on December 14, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $96.40. 11,658 shares vested on January 03, 2022 when the closing price of our common stock was $102.86.

(9)After disposition of a portion of the shares subject to award back to the company to cover taxes, the net number of shares issued was 10,983.

(10)4,500 shares vested on November 29, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $100.57. 1,500 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 1,500 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 3,969 shares vested on December 14, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $96.40. 5,041 shares vested on January 03, 2022 when the closing price of our common stock was $102.86.

(11)After disposition of a portion of the shares subject to award back to the company to cover taxes, the net number of shares issued was 11,036.

(12)4,500 shares vested on November 29, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $100.57. 1,500 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 1,500 shares vested on November 30, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $98.29. 3,473 shares vested on December 14, 2021 when the closing price of our common stock was $96.40. 4,411 shares vested on January 03, 2022 when the closing price of our common stock was $102.86.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			65

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2022

The following table provides information regarding our deferred compensation plans for our NEOs, which include the Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and the Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (“VDCP”).


Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year			Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year(2)(3)		Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions		Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End (2022)
Paul C. Reilly											$204,870
LTIP					$33,900		($41,623)		$66,700		$204,870	(4)
Paul M. Shoukry											$123,502
LTIP					$33,900		($26,518)		$—		$123,502	(4)
James E. Bunn											$855,498
LTIP					$33,900		($110,405)		$—		$518,915	(4)
VDCP		$67,500	(1)		$—		($81,769)		$—		$336,583	(5)
Scott A. Curtis											$424,943
LTIP					$33,900		($90,469)		$—		$424,943
Tashtego S. Elwyn											$204,870
LTIP					$33,900		($41,623)		$66,700		$204,870	(4)

(1)The amounts presented are included in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table and represents salary deferred in January 2022 through September 2022.

(2)The amounts presented in these columns are included in the All Other Compensation table located below the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)Represents amounts earned with respect to the 2022 fiscal year but contributed in December 2022.

(4)The amounts presented include previously and currently reported compensation with respect to LTIP contributions made by us. The following amounts represent vested balances at September 30, 2022: Mr. Reilly $47,718, Mr. Shoukry $10,438, Mr. Bunn $361,763, Mr. Curtis $267,790 and Mr. Elwyn $47,718.

(5)The amount presented includes currently reported compensation with respect to VDCP contributions made by Mr. Bunn. The entire balance is vested as of September 30, 2022.

Long Term Incentive Plan. Our LTIP, originally adopted effective October 1, 2000, is a deferred compensation plan benefiting key management and other highly compensated employees. Under the LTIP, we determine each year which employees will be participants for that plan year and then establish an account for such year for each participant. Although we can elect to use other allocation formulas, historically, the allocations under the LTIP have been made based upon the individual participant’s level of compensation above a minimum, and not in excess of a maximum (for fiscal 2022, these amounts were $290,000 and $890,000, respectively). The Committee or its designee then determines the percentage, if any, by which that compensation is multiplied to determine the contribution credited to each participant’s account for the particular plan year. Each account is thereafter credited (or debited), based upon the allocable share of the return that would have been earned (including any negative return) had all accounts been invested in a group of unaffiliated mutual funds and managed accounts. Senior management selects those mutual funds and managed accounts, pursuant to authority delegated by the Committee. Annual allocations and their deemed earnings vest after five years, subject to earlier vesting in the case of death or disability. We pay the vested account balance in a cash lump sum after five years of credited service, subject to earlier payment in the case of death or disability, and subject to certain deferral rights that must be exercised at least 12 months in advance of the account balance vesting. Because the account balances are unfunded, they represent unsecured claims against the company.

Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan. The VDCP was established effective January 1, 2013, to provide a voluntary, pre-tax capital accumulation opportunity for a select group of highly compensated employees and independent contractors to defer compensation. The VDCP allows participants with annual calendar year compensation of $300,000 or more to defer up to 75% of base salary, bonuses and commissions, subject to certain minimums and maximums, and permits the company to make contributions at any time in its sole discretion. Balances of participants are deemed to be invested, at the election of the participant, in funds selected by the participant from a list chosen by the committee that administers the plan. Each year participants may elect to have that year’s deferrals distributed as a scheduled in-service withdrawal or upon retirement. All plan balances (deferrals, company contributions and earnings thereon) are unsecured liabilities of the company. (The Amended & Restated VDCP was filed as exhibit 10.12 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2018.)


66

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for Fiscal 2022

Except as described below and on pp. 51-52 herein with respect to the CEO special one-time equity retention award, none of the NEOs is a party to any agreement or arrangement with us providing for payments in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance or retirement, a change in such officer’s responsibilities, or a change in control of the company. The following tables summarize the estimated payments to be made under each agreement, plan or arrangement in effect as of September 30, 2022, which provides for payments to an NEO at, following or in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, we do not report any amount to be provided to an NEO under any arrangement that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of our NEOs and that is available generally to all salaried employees. In accordance with SEC regulations, this analysis assumes that the NEOs’ date of termination is September 30, 2022, and the price per share of our common stock on the date of termination is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE as of that date, which was $98.82.

Paul C. Reilly


Benefit and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)	Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)	Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)	Retirement ($)(1)	Death or Disability ($)	Change in Control ($)	Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)
Salary Continuation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Annual Cash Bonus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Severance Payment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Share Awards	$30,339,815	$30,339,815	—	$30,339,815	$30,710,390	—	$30,710,390
Stock Options	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Welfare Benefits	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

(1)Mr. Reilly’s RSU stock bonus awards and retention awards granted in November and December 2017 and 2018 under the 2012 Plan contain an additional definition of “retirement” in order to conform with a definition used under the 2007 Stock Bonus Plan, which was in effect when Mr. Reilly was hired. Pursuant to such provision, “retirement” is defined as ending service after age 60 with 5 years of service.

Paul M. Shoukry


Benefit and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)	Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)	Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)	Retirement ($)	Death or Disability ($)	Change in Control ($)	Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)
Salary Continuation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Annual Cash Bonus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Severance Payment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Share Awards	—	$1,320,532	—	—	$4,659,561	—	$4,659,561
Stock Options	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Welfare Benefits	—	—	—	—	—	—	—


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			67

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

James E. Bunn


Benefit and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)	Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)	Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)	Retirement ($)	Death or Disability ($)	Change in Control ($)	Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)
Salary Continuation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Annual Cash Bonus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Severance Payment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Share Awards	—	$6,243,052	—	—	$10,549,529	—	$10,549,529
Stock Options	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Welfare Benefits	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Scott A. Curtis


Benefit and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)	Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)	Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)	Retirement ($)	Death or Disability ($)	Change in Control ($)	Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)
Salary Continuation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Annual Cash Bonus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Severance Payment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Share Awards	$4,338,791	$4,338,791	—	$4,338,791	$4,487,021	—	$4,487,021
Stock Options	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Welfare Benefits	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Tashtego S. Elwyn


Benefit and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)	Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)	Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)	Retirement ($)	Death or Disability ($)	Change in Control ($)	Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)
Salary Continuation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Annual Cash Bonus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Severance Payment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Share Awards	—	$1,747,138	—	—	$4,298,769	—	$4,298,769
Stock Options	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Welfare Benefits	—	—	—	—	—	—	—


68

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

2022 CEO Pay Ratio

Set forth below is a reasonable estimate of the ratio of annual total compensation of Paul C. Reilly, our CEO, to the annual total compensation of our median employee, calculated in accordance with SEC rules. Since these rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their own individual circumstances, the ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the ratios reported by other companies.

As permitted by SEC rules, we are using the same median employee determined in accordance with the procedures described in our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, because there were no significant changes to our employee population, changes to our compensation programs, or changes to the median employee’s circumstances that could reasonably be expected to have the effect of significantly altering our pay ratio disclosure.

For fiscal 2022, we estimated the ratio of such median employee’s annual total compensation to that of the CEO in accordance with SEC rules for the Summary Compensation Table, as follows:

•the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (other than the CEO) was $114,022;

•the annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $18,059,116; and

•the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 158 to 1.

Other Compensation Policies

Hedging Policy

The company maintains a written Insider Trading Policy (“Policy”) that is designed to prohibit company personnel from violating insider trading laws and mitigate the risk of even the appearance of improper conduct. The Policy applies to directors, officers, employees and other associates of the company, together with certain of their family members and controlled entities (“Covered Persons”). The Policy imposes the following restrictions on trading in securities issued by the company (including our common stock), whether or not the Covered Person is aware of material nonpublic information concerning the company.

Directors and Executive Officers. Under the Policy, members of the company’s Board and its executive officers (the “Pre-Clearance Group”) may not, in connection with our securities:

•engage in transactions in publicly traded or private options or other derivative securities

•hold such securities in a margin account unless such securities have been exempted from any security interest of the broker

•pledge such securities as collateral for a loan, or

•utilize standing orders for longer than one business day (other than employee stock option limit orders or approved Rule 10b5-1 trading plans).

All Covered Persons. In addition, no Covered Person (including the Pre-Clearance Group) may, in connection with our securities:

•engage in short sales

•transact in publicly traded or private options; except that non-Pre-Clearance Group members may sell covered call options, and/or buy protective put options in non-speculative, bona fide transactions against an ~~‘‘at will’’ basis and do not have~~existing, non-restricted long position (with certain exceptions)

•enter into, modify or cancel a standing order when subject to a trading “blackout”

•allow any ~~special arrangements for severance payments following termination.~~financial advisor to purchase or sell such securities within a discretionary account, or

•engage in hedging or monetization transactions.

The Policy permits Covered Persons to request limited exceptions to these restrictions from time to time from the Legal Department.

Compensation Recoupment Policy

~~Our Board~~The company maintains a Compensation Recoupment Policy that is intended to reduce potential risks associated with our compensation plans, and thus better align the long-term interests of our ~~named executive officers~~NEOs and our shareholders. The policy contains three triggers that could result in “clawback” of compensation: (i) instances of financial statement restatement, (ii) discovery of a materially inaccurate performance measure that resulted in an inappropriate award or vesting of incentive compensation, and (iii) serious misconduct or materially imprudent judgment that caused the company material financial or reputational harm. (Incentive compensation is defined to include any compensation other than base salary, and

it thus includes cash, shares of stock, restricted shares, ~~restricted stock units~~RSUs and stock options.) The third trigger gives the Committee authority to require forfeiture of the employee’s unvested incentive compensation awards and/or reimbursement of the most ~~recently-received~~recently received annual bonus. It applies to all executive officers and to any other employee whose annual incentive compensation exceeds 50% of total annual compensation, with the exception of Private Client Group financial advisors and branch managers.

~~Stock Ownership Policy~~

The Committee maintains a Directors and Executive Officers Stock Ownership Policy that stipulates the ownership levels that our non-executive directors and executive officers are expected to attain within five years of the policy’s adoption (February 2015). Under the policy, directors are required to own shares of our common stock with a value equal to five times their annual retainer. Our chief executive officer is required to own shares equal to six times annual salary, while other executive officers must own three times their respective annual salaries. (All calculations are based on the weighted average of the stock’s NYSE closing prices on the date of each grant or other acquisition during the accumulation period.) Shares owned directly or jointly with family members, and indirectly (including shares held in a retirement plan), as well as unvested restricted stock and RSUs, the vesting of which is solely time-based, are counted towards satisfaction of this requirement. Until the applicable ownership level is achieved, each individual is required to retain 100% of the net (after deductions for taxes or option exercise price) shares obtained through the company’s share incentive plans.

~~Succession Planning~~

The Board believes that effective management succession planning, particularly for the chief executive officer role, is important for the continued success of the company. Among the responsibilities described in the Committee’s charter is the review of succession planning for the CEO and other senior management positions. Consequently, our chief executive officer and chief human resources officer make detailed presentations to the Committee annually on senior management succession plans and individual development plans for identified successors. This information is compiled through a twice-yearly organization-wide process designed to identify potential successors, evaluate the “readiness” of internal candidates and identify situations where the firm may need to consider external talent. The Committee discusses the development plans of succession candidates, particularly for the CEO role, monitors such candidates’ progress, and reports its conclusions to the full Board. High potential leaders are also given exposure to Board members through formal presentations and informal events, which provide directors with opportunities to personally assess the candidates’ skills and leadership capabilities.

~~Use of Compensation Consultants~~

The Committee engaged a compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, to provide certain market data in connection with its 2017 compensation determinations for our executive officers, including our chief executive officer. The Committee uses such data as reference material to assist it in maintaining a general awareness of industry compensation standards and trends. The market data does not formulaically determine the Committee’s compensation decisions for any particular executive officer. The Committee does not target a particular percentile of the peer groups with respect to total pay packages or any individual component of pay. (For more information, please see the section above entitled “Summary of Compensation Decisions for 2017.”)

~~Consideration of Prior ‘‘Say-on-Pay’’ Vote~~

We hold an advisory vote of our shareholders on executive compensation annually. At the 2017 annual shareholders meeting, 96.65% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory proposal to approve our named executive officers’ compensation (the ‘‘Say-on-Pay’’ proposal). We believe that the 2017 vote approving the Say-on-Pay proposal conveyed our shareholders’ strong support of the Committee’s decisions and our existing executive compensation programs. Based on this feedback, the Committee determined to continue our current compensation practices as described herein.

~~Compensation Framework — Policies and Process~~

~~Policies and Goals~~. The company competes for talent with other large financial services firms throughout the country, and our ability to sustain or improve our position in this highly competitive environment depends substantially on our ability to continue to attract and retain the most qualified employees. Our overall aim is to utilize our compensation programs to reward executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and increased total shareholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-

taking. In support of our recruitment and retention objectives, we structure our incentive awards to include vesting, deferred payment, and cancellation and clawback provisions that protect the company and ensure that the executive’s individual interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. The named executive officers participate on the same basis as other employees in health and welfare, and paid time-off benefits.

Our executive compensation program emphasizes discretionary variable annual performance compensation and long-term incentive compensation, a portion of which will be received by the executive only upon our attainment of specific financial targets. Variable annual performance compensation and long-term incentive compensation are adjusted year-over-year to appropriately reward annual achievement of the company’s financial and strategic objectives. In addition, long-term incentive compensation serves shareholders’ interests by conditioning vesting upon future performance that executes on the Company’s long-term business strategy. The structure of our compensation program balances the objectives of delivering returns for shareholders and providing appropriate rewards to motivate superior individual performance.

The company delivers a portion of incentive compensation in the form of equity awards to further align employee interests with those of shareholders. The committee believes that linking compensation amounts to performance and delivering annual and long-term incentives partially in the form of deferred equity awards that are affected, up or down, by future return on equity performance, and that are subject to cancellation and clawback over a multi-year period, helps motivate executives to achieve financial and strategic goals within the bounds of the company’s risk tolerance levels. Where an executive officer’s annual bonus exceeds the amount of $275,000, a variable portion of the bonus over $250,000 is delivered in the form of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’). These RSUs vest over a three-year period. The proportion of RSUs increases with the size of the bonus according to the following formula:



~~Portion of Annual Bonus~~2023 PROXY STATEMENT		~~Portion in RSUs~~
~~$250,000 - $500,000~~	~~10%~~
~~$500,001 - $1,000,000~~	~~15%~~
~~$1,000,001 - $2,000,000~~	~~20%~~
~~$2,000,001 - $3,000,000~~	~~25%~~
~~Above $3,000,000~~	~~50%~~69

~~One-half of such RSUs vest~~

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on ~~the 3~~rd ~~anniversary of grant. The other half vests on the 3~~rd anniversary of the grant only if the company attains certain defined adjusted average after-tax return on equity (‘‘ROE’’) levels over the 3-year measurement period. The Committee has chosen ROE because it believes it is an appropriate indicator of the return the company is delivering on shareholders’ equity, since it reflects both bottom-line profitability and the manner in which the company is managing shareholders’ equity to generate such profitability. The Committee believes that ROE is particularly relevant for the financial services industry in light of the capital-intensive nature of many of our businesses, making it a useful measure of relative performance across many financial services firms. Commencing with grants made in respect of fiscal 2017 performance, the vesting formula is as follows (with results to be interpolated as necessary):

Executive Compensation

Adjusted 3-Year Average After-Tax ROE
RSU Vesting
Percentage
≥18% 150%
15% 125%
12% 100%
9% 75%
6% 50%
<6% 0%
Income Deduction Limitations under Section 162(m)

~~Annual Pay-Setting Process~~. Following recommendation by our chairman and chief executive officer, the Committee sets performance priorities at the beginning of each fiscal year to guide its evaluation of company and individual executive officer performance throughout the year. These performance priorities are a directional assessment made at the beginning of the year, and their attainment or non-attainment does not correspond to any specific compensation

decision or amount of compensation. At such time, the Committee also stipulates that annual bonuses will be funded from a pool not to exceed 6% of consolidated pre-tax income, with no individual bonus to exceed 3% of such measure.

Following completion of a fiscal year, our chairman and chief executive officer reviews the performance of the company and evaluates the individual performance of each executive officer, including the named executive officers, against previously-determined individual goals. After consultation with our chairman emeritus, our CEO then makes recommendations to the Committee as to the respective amounts of annual bonus and retention RSUs to be awarded to each named executive officer (other than himself). Similarly, our chairman emeritus reviews the performance of the CEO and discusses with the Committee (in the absence of the CEO) his recommendations as to the appropriate amounts of the CEO’s annual bonus and retention RSU grants.

To inform its use of discretion in determining compensation, the Committee evaluates both company and individual performance. The Committee does not utilize formulaic financial performance goals or targets, and performance metrics are not assigned any specific weighting for purposes of determining the compensation awarded to the CEO or other NEOs. Since market conditions — and the macroeconomic environment — strongly affect the financial services industry and can change dramatically during the course of a year, the Committee assesses financial performance at the end of the year in light of the most recent facts and circumstances. No single financial or performance metric controls compensation decisions. Rather, such data are used to help the Committee better understand company and individual performance. After evaluating the performance of our CEO and each of our other named executive officers for the relevant fiscal year, the Committee applies its discretion to determine the compensation for each.

~~Effect of Section 162(m).In determining compensation for the named executive officers, the Committee considers the potential impact of~~ Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue ~~Code. Section~~ Code (“§162(m)”) generally ~~disallows~~sets a ~~tax deduction to public corporations for compensation greater than~~limit of $1 million ~~paid per fiscal~~on the amount of compensation that the company may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any given year with respect to ~~each~~the compensation of ~~the corporation’s ‘‘covered employees’’ (generally, the chief~~“covered employees,” which currently includes our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and the ~~next~~ three most highly compensated executive officers (as well as of the end of any fiscal year). However, compensation which qualifies as ‘‘performance-based’’ is excluded from the $1 million per executive officer limit if, among other requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals under a plan approved by the company’s shareholders.

~~As part of our compensation program for executive officers, the company maintains the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (‘‘2012 Plan’’)~~individuals in these categories in certain prior years). The ~~2012 Plan provides for annual performance-based awards~~Committee believes that the tax deduction limitation should not compromise its ability to ~~eligible employees. For each~~design and maintain executive ~~officer,~~compensation arrangements that will attract and retain the ~~Committee determines on an annual basis an award maximum under~~executive talent to compete successfully. Accordingly, achieving the 2012 Plan. Award maximums are expressed as a percentage of consolidated pre-tax income — an objectively determined performance criteria that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exemption to the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m). Award maximums pertain to the cumulative value of an executive officer’s annual variable compensation — consisting of the annual bonus (including a portion delivereddesired flexibility in the ~~form~~design and delivery of ~~RSUs) and retention RSU award. We believe~~compensation may result in compensation that, ~~the annual bonuses and retention RSUs awarded to the NEOs constituted performance-based compensation and should therefore be~~in certain cases, is not deductible ~~by the company~~ for ~~U.S.~~ federal income tax ~~purposes. While our policy,~~purposes.

Based on the factors discussed under “2022 Compensation Decisions” above, in ~~general, is to maximize~~fiscal 2022 the ~~tax deductibility of compensation~~company paid, ~~to executive officers covered under Section 162(m),~~and in fiscal 2022 the Committee nevertheless may authorize awards or payments that might not be tax deductible if it believes they are in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. In the event the Committee determines to grant additional compensation that is not performance-based compensation to an executive subject to the provisions of Section 162(m), the additional compensation will be subject to the $1 million deduction limitation.

~~Compensation and Risk.~~ The Board, with the assistance of the Committee, has evaluated our compensation policies and practices for all employees. Specifically, the Board reviewed an update of the following, in-depth review of incentive programs:

At the direction of the Committee, an independent compensation consultant partnered with our Enterprise Risk Management and Human Resources functions to conduct an independent assessment of the material incentive compensation plans across the organization.

This process began with an objective evaluation of job functions, assessing the level of risk influence across six specific categories: credit, liquidity, market, operational, legal & compliance and reputational.

~~Incentive plans for job functions that were identified as having the potential to expose~~expects the company to ~~the highest level of risk were further reviewed across~~pay, certain NEOs compensation (including a ~~consistent framework to identify potential operational plan risks of the incentive design.~~

~~The incentive design evaluation focused on key elements of the plan design, including: (i) performance measures, (ii) funding, (iii) performance period~~base salary, annual bonus and ~~pay mix, (iv) goal setting, (v) leverage, and (vi) controls and processes.~~

~~Additionally, the review noted~~retention RSUs) that, ~~the mandatory deferral (a portion of bonus amounts exceeding $275,000 are delivered in a mix of time and -~~ in the ~~case of executive officers - performance vesting equity awards), robust share ownership guidelines, compensation recoupment policy and prohibition on hedging by executives further mitigate risk~~aggregate, exceeds $1 million in ~~our compensation plans.~~

value. The ~~review concluded~~Committee believes that none of the company’s formulaic incentive plans were likely to motivate behavior that would result in material adverse impact to the company. The potential risks identified through the process were determined to be effectively mitigated through established risk controls, leadership oversight, and the culture of proactive risk management.

In light of the above, our Board continues to conclude that our compensation policies in general, and our incentive programs in particular, remain well aligned with the interests of our shareholders and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company.

~~2017 COMPENSATION TABLES~~

~~Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017~~

The following table sets forth information about compensation earned by our named executive officers during fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017 in accordance with SEC rules. The information presented below may be different from compensation information presented in this Proxy Statement under the caption ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’ since that section describes compensation decisions made in respect of the indicated fiscal year, regardless of when the compensation was actually paid or granted. For an explanation of the principal differences between the presentation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the table below, please see the note on page 32.

Name Year Salary
Bonus ⁽¹⁾
Stock
Awards⁽²⁾
Option
Awards⁽²⁾
All Other Compensation⁽³⁾
Total
Paul C. Reilly 2017 $ 486,250
$5,700,056 $ 3,394,366
(4) $ —
$187,575 $9,768,247
Chairman and Chief 2016 $ 445,000
$4,575,034 $ 2,997,970

$ —
$231,809 $8,249,813
Executive Officer - RJF 2015 $ 445,000
$4,325,030 $ 1,549,964

$ 195,192
$107,119 $6,622,305
Jeffrey P. Julien 2017 $ 280,000
$2,000,070 $ 672,146
(5) $ —
$138,932 $3,091,148
Executive VP, Finance 2016 $ 280,000
$1,737,554 $ 556,444

$ —
$119,197 $2,693,195
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer - RJF 2015 $ 278,750
$1,580,056 $ 249,998

$ 195,192
$57,256 $2,361,252
John C. Carson, Jr. 2017 $ 300,000
$2,187,516 $ 884,672
(6) $ —
$104,786 $3,476,974
President - RJF 2016 $ 300,000
$2,375,028 $ 736,484

$ —
$103,928 $3,515,440
2015 $ 300,000
$2,150,016 $ 412,479

$ 195,192
$72,452 $3,130,139
Jeffrey E. Trocin 2017 $ 305,000
$2,700,053 $ 639,661
(7) $ —
$183,789 $3,828,503
Co-President, Global Equities 2016 $ 305,000
$1,620,000 $ 798,994
$ —
$178,541 $2,902,535
and Investment Banking - RJA 2015 $ 305,000
$2,337,506 $ 699,961
$ 195,192
$45,973 $3,583,632
Dennis W. Zank 2017 $ 330,000
$2,575,074 $ 909,688
(8) $ —
$122,458 $3,937,220
Chief Operating Officer - RJF 2016 $ 330,000
$2,450,012 $ 786,456

$ —
$129,789 $3,696,257
2015 $ 330,000
$2,300,044 $ 462,457

$ 195,192
$75,031 $3,362,724

~~__________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~The amounts disclosed in the Bonus column represent the annual cash bonus, as described in the CD&A, awarded to the Named Executive Officers.~~

~~(2)~~

The amounts shown in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns represent the grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in the fiscal year shown. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards under ASC Topic 718, see Note 20 to our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017. For more information, see the Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal 2017 table below.


~~(3)~~	~~See the All Other Compensation table below for a breakdown of these amounts.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Includes 28,446 RSUs that are time-vesting and 18,445 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Reilly is $2,006,171.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Includes 7,155 RSUs that are time-vesting and 2,154 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Julien is $234,281.~~


~~(6)~~	~~Includes 8,620 RSUs that are time-vesting and 3,620 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Carson is $393,729.~~


~~(7)~~	~~Includes 6,931 RSUs that are time-vesting and 1,930 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Trocin is $209,916.~~


~~(8)~~	~~Includes 8,793 RSUs that are time-vesting and 3,792 RSUs that are performance vesting awards. The maximum value at the grant date of the performance vesting RSUs for Mr. Zank is $412,437.~~

~~All Other Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017~~

~~The following table sets forth more detailed information concerning the items included in the ‘‘All Other Compensation’’ column of the Summary Compensation Table above.~~

Employee Stock Ownership Plan Contribution Profit Sharing Contribution 401(k) Company Match
Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution^(a)
Deferred Compensation Plan Gain^(a)
Accrued Dividends ^(b)
Commissions Perquisites Total All Other Compensation
Paul C. Reilly $ 5,300
$ 12,609
$ 1,000
$ 40,500
$ 26,985
$ 73,064
$ —
$ 28,117
(c) $ 187,575
Jeffrey P. Julien $ 5,300
$ 14,384
$ 1,000
$ 40,500
$ 67,299
$ 10,169
$ 280
$ —
$ 138,932
John C. Carson, Jr. $ 5,300
$ 13,633
$ 1,000
$ 40,500
$ 22,394
$ 21,959
$ —
$ —
$ 104,786
Jeffrey E. Trocin $ 5,300
$ 14,179
$ 1,000
$ 40,500
$ 102,864
$ 19,649
$ 297
$ —
$ 183,789
Dennis W. Zank $ 5,300
$ 14,726
$ 1,000
$ 40,500
$ 27,345
$ 18,494
$ 15,093
$ —
$ 122,458

~~___________________~~


~~(a)~~	~~See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table for more information.~~


~~(b)~~	~~Includes accrued dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock units as of September 30, 2017.~~


~~(c)~~	Includes company-paid travel, hotel and meal related expenses for guest or spouse in conjunction with company-sponsored off-site business meetings and tickets to sporting events. Company-paid travel expenses include approximately $14,900 in airfare ticket costs.

~~Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal 2017~~

~~The following table contains information concerning plan-based awards granted to each of the named executive officers during fiscal 2017.~~

Name Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Units⁽²⁾

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and
Option Awards ($)⁽⁶⁾
Threshold⁽³⁾
Target⁽⁴⁾
Maximum⁽⁵⁾
Paul C. Reilly 12/15/2016 9,223 18,445 27,668
$1,337,447
12/15/2016

18,446
⁽⁷⁾
$1,337,519
11/30/2016 10,000
⁽⁸⁾
$719,400
Jeffrey P. Julien 12/15/2016 1,077 2,154 3,231 $156,187
12/15/2016 2,155
⁽⁷⁾
$156,259
11/30/2016 5,000
⁽⁸⁾
$359,700
John C. Carson, Jr. 12/15/2016 1,810 3,620 5,430 $262,486
12/15/2016 3,620
⁽⁷⁾
$262,486
11/30/2016 5,000
⁽⁸⁾
$359,700
Jeffrey E. Trocin 12/15/2016 965 1,930 2,895 $139,944
12/15/2016 1,931
⁽⁷⁾
$140,017
11/30/2016

5,000
⁽⁸⁾
$359,700
Dennis W. Zank 12/15/2016 1,896 3,792 5,688 $274,958
12/15/2016 3,793
⁽⁷⁾
$275,030
11/30/2016 5,000
⁽⁸⁾
$359,700

~~___________________~~

~~(1)~~

The ‘‘Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards’’ columns represent the minimum, target and maximum number of shares that could be received by each listed officer upon the vesting of RSUs, excluding dividend equivalents. RSUs vest based on the Company’s adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019. See footnote (16) to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2017 table hereof for more information.


~~(2)~~	Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive (i) one share of common stock and (ii) non-preferential dividend equivalents equal to the sum of any dividends on the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs that were actually paid during the vesting period.


~~(3)~~	~~Threshold is 50 percent of awarded RSUs if the adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity is at least equal to 5 percent.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Target is 100 percent of awarded RSUs if the adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity is equal to 11 percent.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Maximum is 150 percent of awarded RSUs if the adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity is 17 percent or more.~~


~~(6)~~	Reflects the grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards under ASC Topic 718, see Note 20 to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.


~~(7)~~	We deliver a portion of the annual bonus awarded to highly compensated employees in the form of RSUs (see the CD&A for more information). These RSUs vest approximately three years from the date of grant.


~~(8)~~	~~We grant stock retention awards in the form of RSUs. These RSUs vest 60% on the third, and 20% on each of the fourth and fifth, anniversaries of the grant date.~~

~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2017~~

~~The following table contains information as of September 30, 2017 about the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers.~~

Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable Option Exercise Price Option Expiration Date Number of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
Market Value of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽¹⁾
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested⁽²⁾
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value Of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested⁽¹⁾
Paul C. Reilly 2,500 2,500 $37.87 11/29/2019 (3)
4,000 (4) $337,320 14,142 (5) $1,192,595
7,500 5,000 $48.20 11/21/2020 (6)
14,142 (7) $1,192,595 20,890 (8) $1,761,654

12,500 $55.49 11/20/2021 (9)
10,000 (10) $843,300 18,445 (11) $1,555,467

20,891 (12) $1,761,738

10,000 (13) $843,300

18,446 (14) $1,555,551
Jeffrey P. Julien
2,500 $37.87 11/29/2019 (3)
2,281 (7) $192,357 2,281 (5) $192,357
7,500 5,000 $48.20 11/21/2020 (6)
5,000 (10) $421,650 2,325 (8) $196,067

12,500 $55.49 11/20/2021 (9)
2,326 (12) $196,152 2,154 (11) $181,647

5,000 (13) $421,650

2,155 (14) $181,731
John C. Carson, Jr.
12,500 $55.49 11/20/2021 (9)
3,764 (7) $317,418 3,763 (5) $317,334

5,000 (10) $421,650 3,876 (8) $326,863

3,877 (12) $326,947 3,620 (11) $305,275
5,000 (13) $421,650
3,620 (14) $305,275
Jeffrey E. Trocin 16,000 4,000 $37.87 11/29/2019 (15)
6,387 (7) $538,616 6,386 (5) $538,531
7,500 5,000 $48.20 11/21/2020 (6)
5,000 (10) $421,650 4,415 (8) $372,317

12,500 $55.49 11/20/2021 (9)
4,415 (12) $372,317 1,930 (11) $162,757
5,000 (13) $421,650
1,931 (14) $162,841
Dennis W. Zank
2,500 $37.87 11/29/2019 (3)
4,220 (7) $355,873 4,219 (5) $355,788

5,000 $48.20 11/21/2020 (6)
5,000 (10) $421,650 4,307 (8) $363,209

12,500 $55.49 11/20/2021 (9)
4,307 (12) $363,209 3,792 (11) $319,779

5,000 (13) $421,650

3,793 (14) $319,864

~~___________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~The market value of stock awards is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on September 30, 2017, which was $84.33.~~

~~(2)~~

The number of units reported assumes that the award received by each named executive officer upon vesting is 100 percent of awarded RSUs based upon achieving an adjusted average after-tax return on equity of 12 percent for grants prior to fiscal year 2016 and 11 percent for grants in fiscal years 2016 and 2017. See footnote (16) to this table for more information. For purposes of calculating the adjusted average after-tax return on equity, our fiscal year 2017 reported results on a GAAP basis were adjusted to exclude the effect of acquisition-related expenses, losses on the extinguishment of debt, and amounts related to a certain legal settlement. For purposes of calculating the adjusted average after-tax return on equity, our fiscal year 2016 reported results on a GAAP basis were adjusted to exclude the effect of acquisition-related expenses and amounts related to a certain legal settlement. See the reconciliation schedule published on page 38 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017 for more

~~information. There were no non-GAAP adjustments to our fiscal year 2015 reported results for purposes of calculating the adjusted average after‑tax return on equity.~~


~~(3)~~	~~The 12,500 option award was granted seven years prior to the option expiration date. The unexercisable options vest 100% in five years from date of grant.~~


~~(4)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on November 21, 2013 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from date of grant.~~


~~(5)~~	The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2014 and vests three years from that date based on the Company’s adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017.


~~(6)~~	~~The 12,500 option award was granted seven years prior to the option expiration date. The unexercisable options vest 50% in four years and 50% in five years from the date of grant.~~


~~(7)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2014 and cliff vests in three years from that date.~~


~~(8)~~	The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2015 and vests in three years from that date based on the Company’s adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018.


~~(9)~~	~~The 12,500 option award was granted seven years prior to the option expiration date. The unexerciseable options vest 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from the date of grant.~~


~~(10)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on November 18, 2015 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from grant date.~~


~~(11)~~	The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2016 and vests in three years from that date based on the Company’s adjusted three-year average after-tax return on equity for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019.


~~(12)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2015 and cliff vests in three years from that date.~~


~~(13)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on November 30, 2016 and vests 60% in three years, 20% in four years and 20% in five years from the grant date.~~


~~(14)~~	~~The RSU award was granted on December 15, 2016 and cliff vests in three years from that date.~~


~~(15)~~	~~The 20,000 option award was granted seven years prior to the option expiration date. The unexerciseable options vest 100% in five years from the date of grant.~~


~~(16)~~	Certain RSUs granted since fiscal year 2015 vest on the 3rd anniversary of the grant only if the company attains certain adjusted average after-tax return on equity (“ROE”) levels over a 3-year vesting period. The vesting formulas are as follows (with results to be interpolated as necessary):

Awards Granted Prior to Fiscal Year 2016 and After Fiscal Year 2017
Adjusted 3-Year Average After-Tax ROE
RSU Vesting
Percentage
≥18% 150%
15% 125%
12% 100%
9% 75%
6% 50%
<6% 0%

Awards Granted in Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017
Adjusted 3-Year Average After-Tax ROE
RSU Vesting
Percentage
≥17% 150%
14% 125%
11% 100%
8% 75%
5% 50%
<5% 0%

~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2017~~

The following table provides information about stock options exercised by the named executive officers during 2017 and restricted stock unit awards held by our named executive officers that vested in 2017.

Option Awards Stock Awards

Name
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise⁽¹⁾
Value Realized
On Exercise⁽²⁾

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting⁽³⁾
Value Realized
On Vesting ⁽⁴⁾

Paul C. Reilly 4,172 $231,510 32,484 $2,304,878 (5)
Jeffrey P. Julien 14,255 $1,197,900 4,481 $316,560 (6)
John C. Carson, Jr. — — 9,676 $683,561 (7)
Jeffrey E. Trocin 3,170 $234,591 8,658 $611,644 (8)
Dennis W. Zank 15,000 $458,765 8,149 $575,685 (9)

~~___________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~Total number of shares underlying the options exercised during fiscal year 2017.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Amounts in this column reflect the difference between the market price on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options exercised, multiplied by the number of options exercised.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Total number of restricted stock units that vested during fiscal year 2017.~~


~~(4)~~	~~The value of the shares on each respective vesting date using the closing market price for our common stock.~~


~~(5)~~	6,000 shares vested on November 21, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $72.32. 13,309 shares vested on December 13, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $71.60. 13,175 shares vested on January 3, 2017, when the closing price of our common stock was $69.68.


~~(6)~~	~~2,252 shares vested on December 13, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $71.60. 2,229 shares vested on January 3, 2017, when the closing price of our common stock was $69.68.~~


~~(7)~~	~~4,863 shares vested on December 13, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $71.60. 4,813 shares vested on January 3, 2017, when the closing price of our common stock was $69.68.~~


~~(8)~~	~~4,351 shares vested on December 13, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $71.60. 4,307 shares vested on January 3, 2017, when the closing price of our common stock was $69.68.~~


~~(9)~~	~~4,095 shares vested on December 13, 2016, when the closing price of our common stock was $71.60. 4,054 shares vested on January 3, 2017, when the closing price of our common stock was $69.68.~~

~~Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2017~~

The following table provides information regarding our deferred compensation plans for our named executive officers, which include the Long Term Incentive Plan (‘‘LTIP’’), Deferred Management Bonus Plan (‘‘DMBP’’), Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (‘‘VDCP’’) and the Restricted Cash Agreement (‘‘RCA’’).

Name
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year⁽¹⁾
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year⁽²⁾
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End
Paul C. Reilly
LTIP $ —
$ 40,500
$ 26,985
$ 62,047
$ 232,771
(4)
Jeffrey P. Julien
LTIP $ —
$ 40,500
$ 66,125
$ —
$ 541,071
(4)
DMBP $ —
$ —
$ 279
$ —
$ 279,467
(5)
VDCP $ 100,000
$ —
$ 895
$ —
$ 307,167
(6)
John C. Carson, Jr.
LTIP $ —
$ 40,500
$ 21,606
$ —
$ 179,824
(4)
RCA $ —
$ —
$ 788
$ —
$ 35,346
(7)
Jeffrey E. Trocin
LTIP $ —
$ 40,500
$ 102,549
$ —
$ 802,881
(4)
DMBP $ —
$ —
$ 315
$ —
$ 315,037
(5)
Dennis W. Zank
LTIP $ —
$ 40,500
$ 26,985
$ 62,047
$ 232,771
(4)
DMBP $ —
$ —
$ 360
$ —
$ 360,481
(5)

~~___________________~~


~~(1)~~	~~The amounts presented are included in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table and represent amounts earned with respect to the 2017 fiscal year but paid in December 2017.~~


~~(2)~~	~~The amounts presented in these columns are included in the All Other Compensation table located below the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Represents amounts earned with respect to the 2017 fiscal year but contributed in December 2017.~~


~~(4)~~	The amounts presented include previously and currently reported compensation with respect to LTIP contributions made by us. The following amounts represent vested balances at September 30, 2017, Mr. Reilly $52,948, Mr. Julien $361,247, Mr. Carson $0, Mr. Trocin $802,881, and Mr. Zank $52,948.


~~(5)~~	The amounts presented include previously and currently reported compensation with respect to DMBP contributions made by us. The following amounts represent vested balances at September 30, 2017: Mr. Julien $279,467, Mr. Trocin $315,037, and Mr. Zank $360,481.


~~(6)~~	~~The amount presented includes currently reported compensation with respect to VDCP contributions made by Mr. Julien. The entire balance is vested as of September 30, 2017.~~


~~(7)~~	~~The amount presented includes previously and currently reported compensation with respect to RCA contributions made by us. There is no vested balance as of September 30, 2017.~~

Our LTIP, originally adopted effective October 1, 2000, is an unfunded deferred compensation plan benefiting key management and other highly-compensated employees. Under the LTIP, we determine each year which employees will be participants for that plan year and then establish an account on our books for such year for each participant. Although we can elect to use other allocation formulas, historically, the allocations under the LTIP have been made based upon the individual participant’s level of compensation above a minimum, and not in excess of a maximum (for fiscal 2017, these amounts were $265,000 and $865,000, respectively). The CGN&C Committee or its designee then determines the percentage, if any, by which that compensation is multiplied to determine the contribution credited to each participant’s account for the particular plan year. Each account is thereafter credited (or debited), based upon the allocable share of the return that would have been earned (including any negative return) had all accounts been invested in a group of unaffiliated mutual funds and managed accounts. Senior management selects those mutual funds and managed accounts, pursuant to authority delegated by the CGN&C Committee. Annual allocations and their deemed earnings vest after five years, subject to earlier vesting in the case of death or disability. We pay the vested account balance in a cash lump sum after five years of credited service, subject to earlier payment in the case of death or disability, and subject to certain deferral rights that must be exercised at

~~least 12 months in advance of the account balance vesting. Because the account balances are unfunded, they represent only unsecured claims against the Company.~~

Our DMBP, originally adopted effective October 1, 1989, preceded the LTIP. The DMBP remains in effect to administer certain amounts credited prior to the adoption of the LTIP. The last bonus allocation that was made to the DMBP was with respect to fiscal year 1999. Since that time, additional amounts credited to the DMBP accounts have been based on a deemed interest return on the amounts in the respective DMBP accounts. Like the LTIP, the DMBP is an unfunded plan that was established to benefit key management and other highly compensated employees. For fiscal years 1990 through 1999, each participant’s account was credited with a contribution, if any, determined by us in a manner similar to the LTIP. During such period and thereafter, participants’ accounts have been credited with a deemed interest return, based upon the average annual interest rate payable by our broker-dealer affiliate on brokerage client account funds. Annual amounts credited to a participant’s account and the deemed interest vest ratably over an eight-year period, subject to earlier vesting in the case of death, disability, attaining age 65 or a qualified early retirement. We pay the vested account balance as soon as practical following death or disability and, in the case of normal retirement, as soon as practical after the end of the plan year in which retirement occurs following the participant’s attaining the age of 65. Other provisions apply in the case of early retirement. Because the account balances are unfunded, they represent only unsecured claims against the company.

The VDCP was established effective January 1, 2013, for the purpose of offering a voluntary, pre-tax capital accumulation opportunity for a select group of highly compensated employees and independent contractors to defer compensation. The VDCP allows participants with annual calendar year compensation of $300,000 or more to defer up to 75% of base salary, bonuses and commissions, subject to certain minimums and maximums, and permits the company to make contributions at any time in its sole discretion. Balances of participants are deemed to be invested, at the election of the participant, in funds selected by the participant from a list chosen by the committee that administers the plan. Each year participants may elect to have that year’s deferrals distributed as a scheduled in-service withdrawal or upon retirement. All plan balances (deferrals, company contributions and earnings thereon) are unsecured liabilities of the company. (The Amended & Restated VDCP was filed as exhibit 10.14 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 22, 2016.)

~~The RCA was implemented in 2013 in connection with the company’s completion of its acquisition of Morgan Keegan~~necessary in order to ~~emulate~~maintain the provisions of a program in place at Morgan Keegan prior to the transaction. Under the RCA, a cash amount is awarded and invested for five years, subject to forfeiture in the event of termination other than for death, disability or retirement. Mr. John C. Carson, Jr. is the only named executive officer who participates in the RCA.

~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for Fiscal 2017~~

~~Except as described below, none~~competitiveness of the ~~named executive officers~~total compensation package and, as a result, has determined that it is ~~a party to any agreement or arrangement with us providing~~appropriate, regardless of whether certain amounts of such compensation are ultimately deductible for ~~payments in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance or retirement, a change in such officer’s responsibilities, or a change in control~~federal income tax purposes.

Report of the company. The following tables summarize the estimated payments to be made under each agreement, plan or arrangement in effect as of September 30, 2017, which provides for payments to a named executive officer at, following or in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, we do not report any amount to be provided to a named executive officer under any arrangement which does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of our named executive officersCompensation and which is available generally to all salaried employees. In accordance with SEC regulations, this analysis assumes that the named executive officer’s date of termination is September 30, 2017, and the price per share of our common stock on the date of termination is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on that date, which was $84.33.

~~Paul C. Reilly~~

Benefit and Payments
Upon Termination
Voluntary Termination without Good Reason
($)
Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary
Termination by the Company without Cause
($)
Involuntary Termination for Cause
($)
Retirement
($)(1)
Death or Disability
($)
Change in Control
($)
Qualified Termination Following Change in Control
($)
Salary Continuation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual Cash Bonus —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Severance Payment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Share Awards 9,019,599
9,019,599
—
9,019,599
11,043,519
—
11,043,519
Options —
—
—
—
657,300
—
507,555
Welfare Benefits —
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~___________________~~

(1) Mr. Reilly’s RSU stock bonus awards under the 2012 Plan contain an additional definition of ‘‘retirement’’ in order to conform with a definition used under the 2007 Stock Bonus Plan, which was in effect when Mr. Reilly was hired. Pursuant to such provision, ‘‘retirement’’ is defined as ending service after age 60 with 5 years of service.

~~Jeffrey P. Julien~~

Benefit and Payments
Upon Termination
Voluntary Termination without Good Reason
($)
Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary
Termination by the Company without Cause
($)
Involuntary Termination for Cause
($)
Retirement
($)
Death or Disability
($)
Change in Control
($)
Qualified Termination Following Change in Control
($)
Salary Continuation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual Cash Bonus —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Severance Payment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Share Awards 1,140,310
1,140,310
—
1,140,310
1,983,610
—
1,983,610
Options 116,150
116,150
—
116,150
657,300
—
507,555
Welfare Benefits —
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~John C. Carson, Jr.~~

Benefit and Payments
Upon Termination
Voluntary Termination without Good Reason
($)
Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary
Termination by the Company without Cause
($)
Involuntary Termination for Cause
($)
Retirement
($)
Death or Disability
($)
Change in Control
($)
Qualified Termination Following Change in Control
($)
Salary Continuation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual Cash Bonus —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Severance Payment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Share Awards 1,899,112
1,899,112
—
1,899,112
2,742,412
—
2,742,412
Options —
—
—
—
360,500
—
261,911
Welfare Benefits —
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~Jeffrey E. Trocin~~

Benefit and Payments
Upon Termination
Voluntary Termination without Good Reason
($)
Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary
Termination by the Company without Cause
($)
Involuntary Termination for Cause
($)
Retirement
($)
Death or Disability
($)
Change in Control
($)
Qualified Termination Following Change in Control
($)
Salary Continuation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual Cash Bonus —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Severance Payment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Share Awards —
2,147,379
—
—
2,990,679
—
2,990,679
Options —
—
—
—
726,990
—
570,079
Welfare Benefits —
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~Dennis W. Zank~~

Benefit and Payments
Upon Termination
Voluntary Termination without Good Reason
($)
Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary
Termination by the Company without Cause
($)
Involuntary Termination for Cause
($)
Retirement
($)
Death or Disability
($)
Change in Control
($)
Qualified Termination Following Change in Control
($)
Salary Continuation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual Cash Bonus —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Severance Payment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Share Awards 2,077,723
2,077,723
—
2,077,723
2,921,023
—
2,921,023
Options 116,150
116,150
—
116,150
657,300
—
507,555
Welfare Benefits —
—
—
—
—
—
—

~~Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation~~Talent Committee ~~Report~~

The ~~CGN&C~~Compensation and Talent Committee (the "C&T Committee") has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the ~~CGN&C~~C&T Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report.

Respectfully submitted by the ~~CGN&C~~C&T Committee

Gordon L. Johnson, Chair
Robert M. Dutkowsky
Jeffrey N. Edwards
Raj Seshadri


70

Proposal 3 – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote



What is being voted on:An advisory vote to approve the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation			Board recommendation:Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote for the option of "every year" as the preferred frequency for advisory votes on executive compensation.

As required by SEC rules, we provide shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently to vote on future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the rules of the SEC.

Shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation every year, every two years, or every three years. Shareholders also may abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

The Board of Directors has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will permit our shareholders to continue to provide direct input on the company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year, which is consistent with our efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters. At the annual meeting of shareholders held in February 2017, a majority of the company’s shareholders cast their vote in favor of holding an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers.

This vote is advisory, which means that it is not binding on the company, our Board of Directors or the C&T Committee of the Board of Directors. The company recognizes that the shareholders may have different views as to the best approach for the company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our shareholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation. The Board of Directors and the C&T Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote; however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our shareholders.

Shareholders may cast a vote on the preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of every year, every two years, or every three years (or abstain) when voting in response to the resolution set forth below.

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders determine, on an advisory basis, whether the preferred frequency of an advisory vote on the executive compensation of the company’s named executive officers as set forth in the company’s proxy statement should be every year, every two years, or every three years.”


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			71

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan



What is being voted on: Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.		~~Robert P. Saltzman (Chairman)~~ Board recommendation: Our Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of our Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
		~~Gordon L. Johnson~~
	~~Susan N. Story~~

~~COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION~~Background

~~During fiscal year 2017,~~We are asking the ~~following directors served as members~~company’s shareholders to approve an amendment and restatement of the ~~CGN&C Committee: Robert P. Saltzman (Chairman), Gordon L. Johnson~~company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) as the Amended and ~~Susan N. Story. No member~~Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “A&R Plan”) in order to increase the maximum number of shares of the ~~CGN&C~~company’s common stock authorized for issuance over the term of the A&R Plan by 18,000,000 shares from 78,365,916(1) shares to 96,365,916 shares. The amendment and restatement would also extend the term of the A&R Plan to February 23, 2033, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors.

As of December 15, 2022 we have a total of 9,687,057 total outstanding awards, of which 9,360,207 are full value awards and 326,850 are options with the weighted average price of $53.81 and weighted average term of 2.099 years. In addition, as of December 15, 2022, 48,410,690 shares had been issued under the 2012 Plan, 80,983,051 shares were subject to options and other awards under the 2012 Plan and only 3,419,738 shares remained available for the grant of awards under the 2012 Plan. All other provisions of the 2012 Plan will remain in full force and effect under the A&R Plan.

The amendment and restatement of the 2012 Plan for which shareholder approval is sought under this Proposal No. 4 was adopted by the company’s Board on November 30, 2022, subject to and effective upon shareholder approval.

Purpose of the A&R Plan

The purpose of the A&R Plan is to attract, motivate and retain our directors, employees and independent contractors and to provide an incentive to increase long-term shareholder value. We believe that equity is a key element of our compensation package and that equity awards encourage employee loyalty and align employee interests directly with those of our shareholders. The A&R Plan has allowed us to provide our employees with equity-based incentive awards and non-equity based compensation that are competitive with those of companies with which we compete for talent. The A&R Plan includes a variety of forms of awards, including restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock options, dividend equivalents and cash awards, to allow the company to adapt its incentive compensation program to meet its needs in the changing business environment in which it operates.

Purpose of Increasing the Number of Shares Reserved

The A&R Plan is our sole plan for providing equity incentive compensation to eligible directors, employees and independent contractors. The A&R Plan is a vital component of our compensation programs, and increasing the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under equity awards ensures that we have an adequate reserve of shares available for issuance in order to attract, motivate and retain personnel and to provide an incentive to increase long-term shareholder value. The Board believes that equity and cash awards motivate high levels of performance, align the interests of our personnel and shareholders by giving directors, employees and independent contractors the perspective of an “owner” with an equity stake in the company, and provide an effective means of recognizing their contributions to our success. The Board believes that the ability to grant equity and cash awards is a competitive necessity in our industry, and that such awards are essential to recruiting and retaining highly successful financial advisor “producers” and other key personnel who help us meet our goals, as well as rewarding and encouraging current directors, employees and independent contractors. We believe that the ability to grant equity and cash awards will continue to be important to the future success of the Company. If the A&R Plan is not approved and we are unable to grant equity compensation in the future, we may need to consider other compensation alternatives, such as increasing cash compensation.

(1)Adjust for stock split.


72

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

How the Proposed Increase Was Determined

The Board, based on the recommendation of the C&T Committee, ~~was~~is recommending that shareholders approve an ~~officer~~additional 18,000,000 shares of common stock under the A&R Plan. The C&T Committee, which administers the A&R Plan, has exercised its business judgment in concluding that increasing the number of shares of common stock reserved under the A&R Plan is in the company’s best interests. In reaching its decision, the C&T Committee considered the limits recommended by independent shareholder advisory groups, such as Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), and determined a number that it believes complies with ISS’s guidelines while providing the company with a sufficient share reserve to cover the awards we anticipate granting to eligible participants for approximately three (3) years, although the actual number of shares utilized will depend on a variety of factors. Therefore, if shareholders approve the A&R Plan, the company currently expects that it will not ask shareholders to approve additional shares for the A&R Plan until at least the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The company is committed to effectively managing our equity compensation share reserve while minimizing stockholder dilution.

A summary of the material terms and conditions of the A&R Plan, as amended and restated, is set forth below. This summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of all provisions of the plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the A&R Plan, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given them in the A&R Plan.

How the A&R Plan Is Designed to Protect Shareholder Interests

The Board has designed the A&R Plan to include terms that it believes reinforce the alignment between equity-based compensation arrangements and the interests of the company’s shareholders. Those terms generally provide for the following:

•Limits on terms of stock options and SARs: The maximum term of stock options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted under the A&R Plan is seven years.

•No discounting: Stock options and stock appreciation rights must be granted with an exercise price no lower than fair market value on the grant date.

•No stock option or ~~employee~~SAR re-pricing: The A&R Plan prohibits re-pricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval, whether by amending an existing award agreement, substituting a new award at a lower price, or executing a buyout of the award for cash or securities.

•No “evergreen” provision: The A&R Plan does not permit an automatic increase in the shares available for issuance without shareholder approval.

•No liberal share recycling: The number of shares available for issuance under the A&R Plan will be reduced by the number of shares tendered or withheld in payment of an option exercise price, withheld from payment of an award in connection with tax withholding, or subject to a stock appreciation right but not issued in connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right.

•Performance-based vesting of dividends and dividend-equivalent rights: Dividends or dividend-equivalent rights paid on performance vesting awards of restricted stock and RSUs may not vest unless the underlying awards vest.

Summary of the A&R Plan

Share Reserve. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the company’s common stock that may be issued under the 2012 Plan is currently 78,365,916(1) shares, subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock or other extraordinary dividend, or other similar change in the common stock or capital structure of the company. If this proposal is approved by the company’s shareholders, this maximum aggregate amount will be increased by 18,000,000 shares to 96,365,916 shares, and the A&R Plan would then have approximately 21,419,738 shares available for grant.

Share Counting. Each share issued in connection with an award granted under the A&R Plan other than stock options and stock appreciation rights will be counted against the A&R Plan’s share reserve as 2.8 shares for every one share issued in connection with such award (and shall be counted as 2.8 shares for every one share that is returned or deemed not to have been issued from the A&R Plan).

Administration. The Compensation and Talent Committee (the “Administrator”) will administer our A&R Plan. With respect to grants to officers and directors, the Administrator will be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy applicable laws, including Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

(1)Adjust for stock split.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			73

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

No Re-pricings or Exchanges without Shareholder Approval. The company shall obtain shareholder approval prior to (a) the reduction of the exercise price of any stock option or the base appreciation amount of any stock appreciation right awarded under the A&R Plan or (b) the cancellation of a stock option or stock appreciation right at a time when its exercise price or base appreciation amount exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares, in exchange for another stock option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, cash buyout or other award (unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Corporate Transaction). Notwithstanding the foregoing, canceling a stock option or stock appreciation right in exchange for another stock option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, or other award with an exercise price, purchase price or base appreciation amount that is equal to or greater than the exercise price or base appreciation amount of the original stock option or stock appreciation right will not be subject to shareholder approval.

Terms and Conditions of Awards; Eligibility. The A&R Plan provides for the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, dividend equivalent rights, stock appreciation rights and cash awards (collectively referred to as “awards”). The classes of persons who are eligible to participate in the A&R Plan are the directors, employees (including executive officers) and independent contractors of the company and its related entities. Stock options granted under the A&R Plan may be either incentive stock options under the provisions of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), or non-qualified stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to our employees, independent contractors and directors, or to employees, independent contractors and directors of our related entities. As of February 23, 2023, we expect that eight (8) directors (excluding our two employee directors) will be eligible to participate in the A&R Plan, approximately 16,777 employees (including two employee directors and our executive officers) and approximately 19,900 independent contractors will be eligible to receive awards under the A&R Plan. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of the shares subject to stock options designated as incentive stock options that become exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such excess stock options shall be treated as non-qualified stock options. Under the A&R Plan, awards may be granted to such employees, independent contractors or directors who are residing in non-U.S. jurisdictions as the Administrator may determine from time to time. Each award granted under the A&R Plan shall be designated in an award agreement.

The basis for participation in the A&R Plan is the Administrator’s decision, in its sole discretion, that an award to an eligible participant will further the plan’s purposes. In exercising its discretion, the Administrator will consider the recommendations of management and the purposes of the A&R Plan, which are to attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentives to employees, non-executive directors, and independent contractors and to promote the success of the company’s business. Under the 2012 Plan, in most cases, awards have been structured to vest solely over time in order to help retain the recipients. In addition, the Administrator may also make performance-based awards that will vest over time but only upon achievement of one or more performance criteria. In recent years, all eligible directors (including both non-executive directors and employee directors) and less than 17% of employees and 2% of independent contractors have received awards under the 2012 Plan.

Subject to applicable laws, the Administrator has the authority, in its discretion, to select employees, independent contractors and directors to whom awards may be granted from time to time, to determine whether and to what extent awards are granted, to determine the number of shares or the amount of other consideration to be covered by each award (subject to the limitations set forth below), to approve award agreements for use under the A&R Plan, to determine the terms and conditions of any award (including, subject to the limitations of the A&R Plan, the vesting schedule applicable to the award), to amend the terms of any outstanding award granted under the A&R Plan (subject to the limitations described above), to construe and interpret the terms of the A&R Plan and awards granted, to establish additional terms, conditions, rules or procedures to accommodate the rules or laws of applicable non-U.S. jurisdictions, to establish or cause to be established a trust for the purpose of purchasing shares on the open market, holding such shares and using such shares to satisfy the company’s obligations with respect to grants of restricted stock units to participants resident in Canada, and to take such other actions, not inconsistent with the terms of the A&R Plan, as the Administrator deems appropriate.

The term of any award granted under the A&R Plan will be stated in the applicable award agreement, provided that the term of a stock option or stock appreciation right may not exceed seven (7) years (or five (5) years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any participant who owns stock representing more than 10% of our combined voting power or of any parent or subsidiary of us) and the term of an award other than a stock option or stock appreciation right may not exceed ten (10) years. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term of an award shall not include any period for which the participant has elected to defer the receipt of the shares or cash issuable pursuant to the award under a deferral program the Administrator may establish in its discretion.

The A&R Plan authorizes the Administrator to grant incentive stock options at an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date the stock option is granted (or 110%, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to any employee who owns stock representing more than 10% of our combined voting power or any parent or subsidiary of ~~its subsidiaries during 2017,~~us). In the case of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, and ~~no member~~awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation, the exercise price, base appreciation amount or purchase price, if any, shall be not less than 100% of the ~~CGN&C Committee was formerly~~fair market value per share on the date of grant. In the case of all other awards granted under the A&R Plan, the exercise or purchase price shall be determined by the Administrator. In the case of an ~~officer~~award other than an incentive stock option, the exercise or purchase price is generally payable in cash through the participant’s Raymond James brokerage account, in shares, or, with respect to stock options (other than incentive stock options), payment through a broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure or “net exercise” procedure. In the case of an incentive stock option, the exercise price is generally payable in cash through the participant’s Raymond James brokerage account or in shares.


74

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

Under the A&R Plan, the Administrator may establish one or more programs to permit selected participants the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration payable under an award. The Administrator may also establish under the A&R Plan separate programs for the grant of particular forms of awards to one or more classes of participants.

Minimum Vesting Requirement.Any award granted under the A&R Plan may vest as of the date no earlier than the first anniversary of the grant date of such award, except that the following awards will not be subject to this minimum vesting requirement:

•awards granted upon assumption of or substitution for outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired entity;

•shares delivered in lieu of fully vested cash obligations; and

•any additional awards for up to a maximum of 5% of the number of shares available for issuance under the A&R Plan.

The foregoing restriction will not apply to the Administrator’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any award, including in cases of the participant’s termination without cause, retirement, death, or disability, upon or in connection with a Corporate Transaction or Change of Control of the company, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement, or otherwise. In addition, the vesting of awards to our non-employee directors will be deemed to satisfy the one-year minimum vesting requirement to the extent the awards vest on the earlier of (a) the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, or (b) the next annual meeting of the company’s shareholders that is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding annual meeting.

Dividends and Dividend Equivalent Rights. During the vesting period for an award, dividends and dividend equivalent rights on the underlying shares of common stock shall be automatically retained by the company (and not paid out to participants), subject to the vesting of the restricted stock and restricted stock units that are subject to performance vesting. Further, no dividends or dividend equivalent rights will be paid for stock options or stock appreciation rights.

Individual Limits. The maximum number of shares with respect to which stock options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to a participant in each successive twelve (12) month period is 300,000 shares. In connection with the participant’s commencement of service, he or she may be granted stock options and stock appreciation rights for up to a maximum of 600,000 shares. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of shares or other similar change in our shares or our capital structure.

For awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units, with respect to each successive twelve (12) month period, the maximum number of shares that may be issued to a participant pursuant to such awards shall be 300,000 shares. In connection with a participant’s commencement of service, up to a maximum of 600,000 shares may be issued to the participant with respect to a twelve (12) month period relating to such commencement. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of shares or other similar change in our shares or our capital structure.

For cash awards, with respect to each successive twelve (12) month period, the maximum amount that may be paid to a participant pursuant to such awards shall be $5,000,000. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately by the Administrator in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of shares or other similar change in our shares or our capital structure.

Transferability of Awards. Our A&R Plan allows for the transfer of awards under the A&R Plan only (i) by will or (ii) by the laws of descent and distribution. Only the recipient of an award may exercise such award during his or her lifetime.

Certain Adjustments. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the company, the number of shares covered by outstanding awards, the number of shares that have been authorized for issuance under the A&R Plan, the exercise or purchase price of each outstanding award, the maximum number of shares or amount that may be granted subject to awards to any participant, and the like, shall be proportionally adjusted by the Administrator in the event of (i) any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification or similar event affecting the shares, (ii) any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares effected without receipt of consideration by the company or (iii) any other transaction with respect to our shares including a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation (including a spin-off or other distribution of stock or property), reorganization, liquidation (whether partial or complete), distribution of cash or other assets to shareholders other than a normal cash dividend, or any similar transaction; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by the Administrator and its ~~subsidiaries~~determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.

Corporate Transaction. Effective upon the consummation of a Corporate Transaction, all outstanding awards under the A&R Plan will terminate unless the awards are assumed in connection with the Corporate Transaction. In addition, except as provided otherwise in an individual award agreement:

•For the portion of each award that was granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a participant’s annual bonus and that is assumed or replaced, then such award (or replacement award or program) shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) for all of the shares (or other


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			75

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

consideration) at the time represented by the award upon the participant’s “separation from service” without “cause” or for “good reason” on or within eighteen (18) months after the Corporate Transaction.

•For the portion of each award that was not granted in lieu of a ~~party~~cash payment for all or a portion of a participant’s annual bonus and that is assumed or replaced, then a pro-rated amount of the unvested shares or other consideration subject to such award (or replacement award or program) shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any ~~disclosable related person transaction involving~~repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) upon the participant’s “separation from service” without “cause” or for “good reason” on or within eighteen (18) months after the Corporate Transaction.

•For the portion of each award that is neither assumed nor replaced, such portion of the award shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) for all of the shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such portion of the award, immediately prior to the specified effective date of such Corporate Transaction, provided that the participant’s service has not terminated prior to such date.

Change in Control. Except as provided otherwise in an individual award agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, the portion of each award that was granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a participant’s annual bonus shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) for all of the shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by the award upon the participant’s “separation from service” without “cause” or for “good reason” on or within eighteen (18) months after the Change in Control. For the portion of each award that was not granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a participant’s annual bonus, then a pro-rated amount of the unvested shares or other consideration subject to such award shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) upon the participant’s “separation from service” without “cause” or for “good reason” on or within eighteen (18) months after the Change in Control.

Clawback Provision for Executive Officers and Other Participants. The award agreements issued under the A&R Plan incorporate a policy that allows us to require forfeiture of the employee’s unvested incentive compensation awards if officers or certain other employees engage in defined activity detrimental to the company. ~~During 2017, none~~For more information regarding our incentive compensation recoupment policy, see “COMPENSATION MATTERS—Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Recoupment Policy.”

Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the A&R Plan. The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the A&R Plan. The A&R Plan will terminate on February 23, 2033, unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors. To the extent necessary to comply with applicable provisions of federal securities laws, state corporate and securities laws, the Code, applicable rules of any stock exchange or national market system, and the rules of any foreign jurisdiction applicable to awards granted to residents of the jurisdiction, the company shall obtain shareholder approval of any such amendment to the A&R Plan in such a manner and to such a degree as required.

Amended Plan Benefits

We have not granted awards subject to shareholder approval of the A&R Plan, as amended and restated. The amount and timing of awards under the A&R Plan, including grants to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (below), are subject to the discretion of the Administrator, and, except as indicated below, the Administrator has not determined future awards or the participants who might receive them. Therefore, it is not presently possible to determine the benefits or amounts that may be received by individuals or groups pursuant to the A&R Plan in the future, other than our non-executive directors, nor is it possible to determine the benefits or amounts which would have been received by or allocated to individuals or groups for 2023 if the A&R Plan had been in effect. Pursuant to our current compensation program for non-executive directors, each of our non-executive director receives an annual grant of restricted stock units, which units will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant (for more information regarding director compensation, see “Director Compensation”). Each grant consists of that number of restricted stock units settleable in shares of the company’s common stock equal to $180,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of common stock, measured on the basis of the closing sales price as reported on the NYSE on the date of determination. The estimated number of shares of common stock that will be underlying the annual grant to each non-executive director for 2023, based on the closing sales price of a share of common stock on December 14, 2022, as reported on the NYSE is 1,632 shares, subject to any future change in the fair market value of the company’s common stock.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the historical grant of RSUs and options under the 2012 Plan from the effective date of the 2012 Plan through December 15, 2022, (without regard to whether any grants were subsequently forfeited, terminated or canceled) to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below, to all current executive officers as a group, to all current non-employee directors as a group, to each nominee for election as a director, to all nominees for election as a director as a group (including our employee directors), to all associates of directors, executive officers or nominees, as a group, all other persons who received or are to receive 5% of any awards, as a group, and to all other employees and independent contractor registered representatives (including all current officers who are not executive officers) as a group. The level of past grants is not necessarily indicative of the level of future grants.


76

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan


Name and Position(1)	Number of RSUs Granted	Number of Shares Underlying Options Granted
Paul C. Reilly Chair and Chief Executive Officer	1,016,299	93,750
Paul M. Shoukry Chief Financial Officer	88,700	8,250
James E. Bunn President, Global Equities and Investment Banking	304,973	15,376
Scott A. Curtis President, Private Client Group	185,076	48,751
Tashtego S. Elwyn President and Chief Executive Officer, Raymond James and Associates	179,737	48,751
All current executive officers, as a group (16 persons)	2,591,925	449,555
All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group (9 persons)	162,575	—
Nominees for election as a director(2):
Marlene Debel	4,213	—
Robert M. Dutkowsky	9,507	—
Jeffrey N. Edwards	23,936	—
Benjamin C. Esty	23,936	—
Anne Gates	10,940	—
Thomas A. James(3)	77,394	—
Gordon L. Johnson	33,788	—
Roderick C. McGeary	18,446	—
Raj Seshadri	7,873	—
Each associate of such directors, executive officers or nominees (2 persons)	5,847	3,750
Each other person who received or is to receive 5 percent of awards under the A&R Plan (0 persons)	—	—
All employees and independent contractors, other than executive officers, as a group (4,330 persons)	24,073,400	5,870,586

(1)Information presented is historical and does not reflect expected grants for 2023 with respect to any person.

(2)Section excludes Mr. Reilly. Grant details disclosed in table above.

(3)Mr. James does not receive compensation for his services as a director.

For more information about awards previously granted to our directors, including material terms, under the 2012 Plan, see “Director Compensation.” For more information about awards previously granted to our named executive officers, including material terms, under the 2012 Plan, see “COMPENSATION MATTERS—Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal 2022” and “COMPENSATION MATTERS—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for 2022.”

As of December 14, 2022, the fair market value of a share of the company’s common stock was $110.28 measured on the basis of the closing sales price on that date as reported on the NYSE.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			77

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a general summary as of this date of the federal income tax consequences to us and to U.S. participants for awards granted under the A&R Plan. The federal tax laws may change and the federal, state and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon his or her individual circumstances. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be different. This summary does not purport to be complete, and does not discuss state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences.

Non-qualified Stock Options. The grant of a non-qualified stock option under the A&R Plan will not result in any federal income tax consequences to the participant or to the company. Upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the participant is subject to income taxes at the rate applicable to ordinary compensation income on the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise. This income is subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes. Any gain or loss on the participant’s subsequent disposition of the shares of common stock will receive long- or short-term capital gain or loss treatment, depending on whether the shares are held for more than one year following exercise. The company does not receive a tax deduction for any such gain.

A non-qualified stock option can be considered non-qualified deferred compensation and subject to Section 409A of the Code. A non-qualified stock option that does not meet the requirements of Code Section 409A can result in the acceleration of income recognition, an additional 20% tax obligation, plus penalties and interest.

Incentive Stock Options. The grant of an incentive stock option under the A&R Plan will not result in any federal income tax consequences to the participant or to the company. A participant recognizes no federal taxable income upon exercising an incentive stock option (subject to the alternative minimum tax rules discussed below), and the company receives no deduction at the time of exercise. In the event of a disposition of stock acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, the tax consequences depend upon how long the participant has held the shares of common stock. If the participant does not dispose of the shares within two years after the incentive stock option was granted, nor within one year after the incentive stock option was exercised, the participant will recognize a long-term capital gain (or loss) equal to the difference between the sale price of the shares and the exercise price. The company is not entitled to any deduction under these circumstances.

If the participant fails to satisfy either of the foregoing holding periods (referred to as a “disqualifying disposition”), he or she must recognize ordinary income in the year of the disposition. The amount of ordinary income generally is the lesser of (i) the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the exercise price or (ii) the difference between the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise and the exercise price. Any gain in excess of the amount taxed as ordinary income will be treated as a long- or short-term capital gain, depending on whether the stock was held for more than one year.

The “spread” under an incentive stock option — i.e., the difference between the fair market value of the shares at exercise and the exercise price — is classified as an item of adjustment in the year of exercise for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If a participant’s alternative minimum tax liability exceeds such participant’s regular income tax liability, the participant will owe the larger amount of taxes. In order to avoid the application of alternative minimum tax with respect to incentive stock options, the participant must sell the shares within the calendar year in which the incentive stock options are exercised. However, such a sale of shares within the year of exercise will constitute a disqualifying disposition, as described above.

Stock Appreciation Rights. Recipients of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) generally should not recognize income until the SAR is exercised (assuming there is no ceiling on the value of the right). Upon exercise, the recipient will normally recognize taxable ordinary income for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of cash and fair market value of the shares, if any, received upon such exercise. Recipients who are employees will be subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes with respect to income recognized upon exercise of a SAR. Recipients will recognize gain upon the disposition of any shares received on exercise of a SAR equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized on such disposition over (ii) the ordinary income recognized with respect to such shares under the principles set forth above. That gain will be taxable as long- or short-term capital gain depending on whether the shares were held for more than one year.

A SAR can also be considered non-qualified deferred compensation and subject to Section 409A of the Code. A SAR that does not meet the requirements of Code Section 409A can result in the acceleration of income recognition, an additional 20% tax obligation, plus penalties and interest.


78

Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan

Restricted Stock. A restricted stock award is subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code to the extent the award will be forfeited in the event that the participant ceases to provide services to the company. As a result of this substantial risk of forfeiture, the recipient will not recognize ordinary income at the time of the award, unless the participant is retirement eligible. Instead, the recipient will recognize ordinary income on the date when the stock is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, or when the stock becomes transferable, if earlier. The recipient’s ordinary income is measured as the difference between the amount paid for the stock, if any, and the fair market value of the stock on the earlier of those two dates.

The recipient may accelerate his or her recognition of ordinary income, if any, and begin his or her capital gains holding period by timely filing (i.e., within thirty (30) days of the award) an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code. In such event, the ordinary income recognized, if any, is measured as the difference between the amount paid for the stock, if any, and the fair market value of the stock on the date of award, and the capital gain holding period commences on such date. The ordinary income recognized by a recipient that is an employee or former employee will be subject to tax withholding by the company.

Restricted Stock Units. With respect to awards of RSUs, no taxable income is reportable when the RSUs are granted to a participant or upon vesting of the RSUs. Upon settlement, the recipient will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the value of the payment received pursuant to the RSUs. The ordinary income recognized by a recipient that is an employee or former employee will be subject to tax withholding by the company.

RSUs also can be considered non-qualified deferred compensation and subject to Section 409A of the Code. A grant of RSUs that does not meet the requirements of Code Section 409A will result in an additional 20% tax obligation, plus penalties and interest to such recipient.

Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. Recipients of stock-based awards that earn dividends or dividend equivalents will recognize taxable ordinary income on any dividend payments received with respect to unvested and/or unexercised shares subject to such awards, which income is subject to withholding for federal income and employment tax purposes.

Cash Awards. Upon receipt of cash, the participant will have taxable ordinary income, in the year of receipt, equal to the cash received. Any cash received will be subject to tax withholding by the company.

Tax Effect for the Company. Unless limited by Section 162(m) of the Code, the company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the A&R Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a recipient at the time the recipient recognizes such income (for example, when restricted stock is no longer subject to the risk of forfeiture), so long as the company complies with applicable reporting and withholding requirements.

The A&R Plan is not qualified under the provisions of section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to any provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			79

Proposal 5 – Ratify Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



What is being voted on: Ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm.			Board recommendation: Our Board unanimously recommends a vote FORratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023.

General

The ARC has appointed KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, and to audit the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2023. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

If the proposal to ratify the appointment is not approved, the ARC will reconsider the selection of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, but may still determine that the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the company ~~has served on~~and its shareholders. Even if the ~~board of directors or on~~appointment is ratified by the ~~compensation committee of~~shareholders, the ARC, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any ~~other entity~~time during the year if the ARC determines that ~~has or had executive officers serving as~~such a ~~member~~change would be in the best interests of the ~~Board of Directors or CGN&C Committee~~company and its shareholders.

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The ARC, with the approval of the ~~company.~~shareholders, engaged KPMG to perform an annual audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2022. The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to the company by KPMG for fiscal years 2022 and 2021 for the audit of the company’s annual consolidated financial statements and for other services rendered by KPMG.

~~* * *~~


	Fiscal Year
	2022	2021
Audit(1)	$9,401,062	$7,370,218
Audit-Related(2)	684,826	752,221
Tax(3)	230,089	756,688
All Other Fees(4)	107,054	84,230
Total	$10,423,031	$8,963,357

~~REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE~~(1)Audit Fees represents fees for the audit of the company’s consolidated and subsidiary financial statements.

~~Members~~(2)Audit-Related Fees consist primarily of fees for custody rule examinations of registered investment advisors, including the issuance of an independent auditors report on controls over custody operations, an examination to report on controls applicable to our “e-folio” fixed income client application, FICCA attestations for our mutual fund customers and HUD attestations for RJ Bank.

(3)Tax Fees includes tax compliance and consulting services related to federal and state tax returns.

(4)All Other Fees consist principally of consulting services related to certain regulatory matters.

The ARC has adopted a policy for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. The policy is designed to ensure that the auditor’s independence is not impaired. The policy provides that, before the company engages the independent auditor to render any service, the engagement must be formally approved by the ARC. All audit and non-audit services provided to the company and its subsidiaries by KPMG during fiscal year 2022 were formally approved.


80

Proposal 5 – Ratify Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of the Audit and Risk Committee ~~(the “A&R Committee”)~~

Members of the ARC have reviewed and discussed with management and with representatives of KPMG LLP the consolidated financial statements for fiscal ~~2017~~2022 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for fiscal ~~2017.~~2022. In addition, the ~~A&R Committee reviewed~~ARC has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by ~~Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by~~the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ~~(‘‘PCAOB’’~~(“PCAOB”) and ~~approved by~~ the SEC. The ~~A&R Committee~~ARC also received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding independent auditor communications with the ~~A&R Committee~~ARC concerning independence, and discussed with KPMG LLP their independence from us and our management, and considered their independence in connection with any non-audit services provided. The ~~A&R Committee~~ARC also reviewed with KPMG LLP our critical accounting policies and practices and certain written communications between KPMG LLP and our management.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, and in reliance on the representations of management and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report with respect to the financial statements, the ~~A&R Committee~~ARC recommended to the Board ~~of Directors~~ that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal ~~2017~~2022 for filing with the SEC. The Board ~~of Directors~~ approved the recommendation.

Management isis responsible for our financial statements and the financial reporting process, including our system of internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. The firm issues reports on our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

The ~~A&R Committee~~ARC members are not professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The ~~A&R Committee~~ARC serves a ~~board-level~~Board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent registered public accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and the experience of the ~~A&R Committee’s~~ARC’s members in business, financial and accounting matters. In its oversight role, the ~~A&R Committee~~ARC relies on the work and assurances of our management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm, who, in their report, express an opinion on the conformity of our annual financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Benjamin C. Esty, Chair
Marlene Debel
Anne Gates
Roderick C. McGeary



2023 PROXY STATEMENT		~~Benjamin C. Esty, Chair~~
	~~Charles G. von Arentschildt~~
	~~Shelley G. Broader~~
	~~Jeffrey N. Edwards~~
	~~Roderick C. McGeary~~81

Security Ownership Information

~~FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

~~The Audit and Risk Committee~~Security Ownership of ~~the Board, with the approval of the shareholders, engaged KPMG to perform an annual audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017.~~ Principal Shareholders

The following table sets forth the ~~approximate aggregate fees billed or expected~~shares beneficially owned as of December 5, 2022, by each shareholder known to ~~be billed~~us to ~~the company by KPMG for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 for the audit~~beneficially own more than 5% of the company’s ~~annual consolidated financial statements~~outstanding shares. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 215,813,981 shares outstanding as of December 5, 2022.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percent of Class
The Vanguard Group, Inc., 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355	21,356,497	(1)	9.90	%
Thomas A. James, Chair Emeritus, Director, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716	19,330,783	(2)	8.96	%
BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055	18,305,137	(3)	8.48	%

(1)On February 10, 2022, The Vanguard Group, Inc., on behalf of itself and ~~for~~certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Vanguard”), filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that Vanguard had shared voting power with respect to 296,089 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 20,599,746 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 756,751 shares, of our common stock as of January 31, 2022.

(2)As of December 5, 2022, Mr. James had sole voting power with respect to 19,155,903 shares, shared voting power with respect to 174,880 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 19,155,903 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 174,880 shares, of our common stock. Includes 824 shares subject to RSUs that will vest within 60 days.

(3)On February 1, 2022, BlackRock, Inc., on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “BlackRock”), filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that BlackRock had sole voting power with respect to 16,244,299 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 18,305,137 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2021.

Security Ownership of Management

The following table lists the shares of common stock beneficially owned as of December 5, 2022, by (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (3) all current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 215,813,981 of the company’s shares outstanding on December 5, 2022.

Beneficial ownership has been determined according to SEC regulations and includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days after December 5, 2022, upon the vesting of RSUs. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, director nominees and executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. No shares are pledged as security. As of December 5, 2022, no individual director, director nominee or named executive officer other ~~services rendered by KPMG.~~than Thomas A. James, our Chair Emeritus, owned beneficially 1% or more of our shares, and our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group owned approximately 9.46% of our outstanding shares.

Fiscal Year
2017 2016
($)
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾
5,512,490
4,155,647
Audit-Related Fees⁽²⁾
676,971
803,760
Tax Fees⁽³⁾
475,019
550,500
All Other Fees⁽⁴⁾
6,699
134,342
Total Fees 6,671,179
5,644,249

~~____________~~


82

Security Ownership Information

Common Stock Beneficially Owned


Name	Shares of Common Stock		Number of Shares Subject to Exercisable Stock Options	Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of Restricted Stock Units	Total Number of Beneficially Owned Shares	Percent of Class
Thomas A. James	19,329,959	(1)(2)	—	824	19,330,783	8.96	%
James E. Bunn	40,990	(2)	—	9,890	50,880	*
Scott A. Curtis	150,215	(2)	—	3,606	153,821	*
Marlene Debel	2,530		—	—	2,530	*
Robert M. Dutkowsky	7,823		—	—	7,823	*
Jeffrey N. Edwards	25,251		—	—	25,251	*
Tashtego S. Elwyn	66,825	(2)	—	3,090	69,915	*
Benjamin C. Esty	24,201		—	—	24,201	*
Anne Gates	9,255		—	—	9,255	*
Gordon L. Johnson	36,187		—	—	36,187	*
Roderick C. McGeary	16,761		—	—	16,761	*
Paul C. Reilly	268,884	(2)	—	38,736	307,620	*
Raj Seshadri	6,189		—	—	6,189	*
Paul M. Shoukry	16,553	(2)	—	3,638	20,191	*
Susan N. Story	44,537		—	—	44,537	*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (24 persons)	20,350,694	(2)	—	75,623	20,426,317	9.46	%

*Less than 1%.

(1)Includes 174,880 shares for which Mr. James has shared voting power and shared dispositive power.

(2)Includes shares credited to Employee Stock Ownership Plan accounts.

Stock Ownership Policy for Directors and Executive Officers

The Board maintains a Directors and Executive Officers Stock Ownership Policy that stipulates the following ownership levels of shares of our common stock that non-executive directors and executive officers are required to attain within five years of their election or the policy’s most recent adoption/revision (November 21, 2019).


Title	Holding requirement	Valuation	What counts?

Non-executive Director	5X annual retainer	Average of NYSE closing price during 60 days prior to measurement	•Shares owned directly or jointly with family members •Shares owned indirectly •Unvested time-based restricted stock and RSUs

~~(1)~~ Chief Executive Officer	~~Audit Fees represents fees for the audit of the company’s consolidated and subsidiary financial statements.~~ 7X annual salary


~~(2)~~Executive Officers			Audit-Related Fees consist primarily of fees for custody rule examinations of registered investment advisors, including the issuance of an independent auditors report on controls over custody operations, an examination to report on controls applicable to our “e-folio” fixed income client application, FICCA attestations for our mutual fund customers and HUD attestations for RJ Bank. Audit-Related Fees also include fees for comfort letters for debt offerings. 3X annual salary

An individual’s compliance with the policy is tested annually as of the last trading day of each fiscal year. Until the required ownership level is achieved, each individual must retain 100% of the net shares (after deductions for taxes or option exercise price) obtained through the company’s share incentive plans.


~~(3)~~2023 PROXY STATEMENT			~~Tax Fees includes tax compliance and consulting services related to federal and state tax returns.~~83

Security Ownership Information

The following table shows, as of September 30, 2022, the progress of our non-executive directors towards meeting the requirements of the policy.


Name	Year Service Commenced	Shares of Stock Held (#)	Restricted Stock Units Held (#)	Total Shares Held (#)	Share Ownership Goal Met(1)
Marlene Debel	2020	2,530	1,683	4,213	—
Robert M. Dutkowsky	2018	7,823	1,683	9,506	ü
Jeffrey N. Edwards	2014	25,251	1,683	26,934	ü
Benjamin C. Esty	2014	24,201	1,683	25,884	ü
Anne Gates	2018	9,255	1,683	10,938	ü
Gordon L. Johnson	2010	36,187	2,174	38,361	ü
Roderick C. McGeary	2015	16,761	1,683	18,444	ü
Raj Seshadri	2019	6,189	1,683	7,872	ü
Susan N. Story	2008	44,537	1,683	46,220	ü

(1)Based on our current compensation practices, it is anticipated that Ms. Debel will attain her share ownership goal within the time period prescribed by the policy.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the company’s shares to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 or 5 with the SEC. The reporting officers, directors and 10% shareholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely on its review of copies of such reports, the company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, officers and 10% shareholders were complied with during fiscal year 2022, except that, due to a clerical error, Mr. Jonathan Oorlog, Chief Accounting Officer and a reporting officer who is not an executive officer, inadvertently reported one transaction late on a Form 4.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes equity compensation plan information for the plans approved by shareholders, as a group, and for the plans not approved by shareholders, as a group, in each case as of September 30, 2022. In accordance with SEC rules, the table below does not include our Profit Sharing Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP").


Plan Category	(a) Number of Securities to Be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excludes Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(2)	411,956		$52.29	13,310,488	(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders(4)	—		$—	—
Total	411,956		$52.29	13,310,488

(1)The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares or restricted stock units issued under our restricted stock and employee stock purchase plans, which have no exercise price.

(2)On February 23, 2012, the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (as subsequently amended and restated, the “2012 Plan”) was approved by our shareholders. The 2012 Plan serves as the successor to our 1996 Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel, 2007 Stock Option Plan for independent Contractors, 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, 2005 Restricted Stock Plan and 2007 Stock Bonus Plan (the “Predecessor Plans”) Upon approval of the 2012 Plan by our shareholders, the Predecessor Plans terminated (except with respect to awards previously granted under the Predecessor Plans that were outstanding). As of December 15, 2022, no additional awards were outstanding under the Predecessor Plans. Under the 2012 Plan we may grant 15,400,000 new shares in addition to the shares available for grant under the Predecessor Plans.

(3)Includes 8,664,796 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2012 Plan and 4,645,692 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, as of September 30, 2022.

(4)We have two Predecessor Plans that were not previously approved by shareholders: the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel and the Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors. All previously outstanding shares have been exercised or otherwise disposed of.


~~(4)~~84			~~All Other Fees consist principally of due diligence fees related to acquisitions.~~

~~The Audit~~

Political Contributions Disclosure

Public sector decisions can significantly affect Raymond James’ clients and ~~Risk Committee has adopted a policy that it must specifically pre-approve all audit~~advisors, as well as our business strategy and ~~non-audit services provided~~prospects. For this reason, Raymond James participates in constructive engagement with government officials and policy-makers, and we encourage the private civic involvement of our employees, advisors and clients. Our engagement in the political process is grounded in, and guided by, our ~~independent auditors.~~

~~All audit and non-audit services provided~~commitment to the interests of our clients and other stakeholders, and is subject to established procedures and guidelines in a manner that reflects our core values.

Raymond James does not use corporate funds directly for political contributions to candidates, political parties or political committees. We have not made, and do not intend to make, corporate payments to influence the outcome of ballot measures. Additionally, Raymond James does not undertake independent efforts in support of, or in opposition to, candidates, political parties or ballot measures. Finally, Raymond James does not contribute to “independent expenditure” committees organized under §527 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Raymond James is a member of a number of trade associations that may engage in political activities or make political contributions to federal and state candidates or political committees. We encourage our associates to support trade associations by sharing industry expertise via committee and working group participation, advocating for client interests as well as through contributions. The firm’s main purpose for maintaining membership in trade associations is the business, technical, and industry benefits these organizations provide to our clients and other stakeholders. Trade organizations take a wide variety of positions on many political matters, not all of which Raymond James supports.

Relationships and Related Transactions

Introduction. In this section we disclose transactions involving the company where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and ~~its subsidiaries~~any of the company’s “related persons” has a direct or indirect material interest. As defined by ~~KPMG during~~SEC rules, related persons include our executive officers, directors, holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, immediate family members of the foregoing, and certain associated entities. SEC rules require that we disclose all such “related person transactions” that occurred since the beginning of our last completed fiscal year ~~2017 were specifically approved.~~

~~CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS~~(October 1, 2021) to the filing date of this Proxy Statement, as well as any currently proposed transactions. We refer to this period below as the “reporting period.” Accordingly, the dollar amounts set forth in this section, including compensation of certain individuals, do not reflect past fiscal year amounts only, but may include multiple annual bonus payments as well as certain future proposed payments.

Bank Transactions. In the ordinary course of our business, we make bank loans to, and hold bank deposits for, certain of our officers and directors, and also extend margin credit in connection with the purchase of securities to certain of our officers and directors who are affiliated with one of our broker-dealers, as permitted under applicable law, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ~~(‘‘SOX’’~~(“SOX”). These transactions have been made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons, and do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. We also, from time to time and in the ordinary course of our business, enter into transactions involving the purchase or sale of securities as principal from, or to, directors, officers and employees and accounts in which they have an interest. These purchases and sales of securities on a principal basis are effected on substantially the same terms as similar transactions with unaffiliated third parties.

Investments.We have from time to time established private investment funds to permit certain officers to participate in our merchant banking, venture capital and other similar activities by investing alongside the funds that we raise and manage for non-employee investors. Trusts benefiting family members of these officers have also invested in these funds. In addition, certain of our directors and executive officers from time to time may invest their personal monies in funds managed by our subsidiaries on substantially the same terms and conditions as other similarly situated investors in these funds who are neither directors nor officers. The only directors, executive officers or affiliated entities who received distributions of profits earned on investments made by, and other income from, any affiliated fund during the period reported on in an amount exceeding $120,000 in the aggregate was a trust affiliated with Mr. ~~Francis S. Godbold, which, in the aggregate, received $150,237. In addition, each of Mr. Tom James, our Chairman Emeritus, and Mr. Paul~~ Reilly, ~~our Chairman~~Chair and Chief Executive Officer, ~~maintains a Separate Managed Account with ClariVest~~invested $509,900 in equity income portfolios managed by the company’s Asset Management ~~LLC, an affiliate of~~Services division during the ~~company. During fiscal 2018,~~reporting period. Mr. ~~James purchased or will purchase an aggregate of approximately~~

~~$2 million,~~Dutkowsky and ~~Mr. Reilly purchased or will purchase an aggregate of approximately $1 million, in securities in such accounts.~~

~~Share Repurchases.~~ ~~In order to pay (i) the exercise price of options and (ii) withholding or other similar taxes due in connection~~his immediate family members maintain investment accounts with the ~~vesting~~company in respect of equity awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and our prior similar plans, employee participants, including our named executive officers, may elect the ‘‘swap’’ method whereby the participant deliverswhich they paid fees to the company ~~shares equal~~ in value to the required exercise price or tax withholding liability in connection with the exercise or vesting of such equity awards. Under the ‘‘swap’’ method, the price per share paid by the company for repurchases is the closing price of the company’s shares on the NYSE on the date the participant’s exercise request is submitted.

~~During fiscal 2017, the company repurchased shares from the directors or executive officers in amounts exceeding the disclosure threshold for~~ the aggregate ~~consideration shown in~~amount of approximately $456,308 during the ~~following table:~~

Name and Title
Number of
Shares
Repurchased
(#)
Aggregate
Consideration
($)
Bella L. Allaire 3,807 270,944
Paul D. Allison 4,619 338,711
Jeffrey A. Dowdle 3,695 270,954
Jeffrey P. Julien — —
Paul C. Reilly — —
reporting period.

~~Other Matters.~~ Art Collection.Thomas A. and Mary James permit us to display over ~~2,700~~2,400 pieces from their nationally known art collection throughout the Raymond James home office complex, without charge to us. In return, we bear the cost of insurance and the direct and overhead costs of ~~three~~two full-time staff ~~persons who~~persons. They serve as curators for the collection, conduct tours and coordinate special events. ~~These staff~~They also ~~provide services, including selection of works of art and planning of initial exhibitions, to~~collaborate with The James Museum of Western & Wildlife Art, a public art museum ~~sponsored~~founded by Mr. James, ~~that is expected~~ to ~~open in 2018 (“James Museum”). Such staff are also coordinating~~coordinate special exhibitions and the ~~transportation~~borrowing from and acquisition of ~~approximately 300 selected~~works of art ~~works from our offices to~~for the ~~James Museum.~~collection. The art collection at our corporate headquarters is a marketing attraction for businesses and other organizations, and we provide regular tours for clients, local schools, business groups and nonprofit ~~organizations.~~organizations and the community at


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			85

Relationships and Related Transactions

large. In-person tours, which were suspended in March 2020 due to the pandemic, were resumed in November 2021. We continue to provide virtual art tours for special occasions. The total cost to us for these items during the reporting period ~~reported on~~ was approximately ~~$397,466.~~$232,278.

~~Courtland James, a son~~Employment Relationships.Certain family members of ~~Thomas A. James, is~~our directors or executive officers are employed ~~as an Executive Vice President~~by the company and/or affiliated with certain of ~~New Business Development for Eagle Asset Management, Inc., a subsidiary of the company. He was paid cash compensation~~its subsidiaries. The following paragraph sets forth certain information about these relationships during the ~~period reported on of $1,203,334~~reporting period. As explained above, the individual compensation amounts set forth below cover a “reporting period” that is greater than a fiscal year and equity award compensation in the form of Restricted Stock Units in the aggregate grant date value of $124,970. Huntington James, a son of Thomas A. James, is employed in a non-executive position by us. He was paid cash compensation during the period reported on of $268,973.may include two annual bonus cycles.

Mr. Donald Blair, the son-in-law of Francis S. Godbold, is anmanaging director, investment ~~banker with our subsidiary~~banking, at Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJ&A”)~~. He was paid~~, who earned cash compensation ~~during the period reported on~~ of ~~$1,804,577~~$1,813,564 and ~~equity award compensation~~received RSUs in the form of Restricted Stock Units in the aggregate grant date value of $100,000. Karen Julien, the wife of Jeffrey P. Julien, is employed by RJ&A as a branch manager. During the period reported on, she was paid cash compensation in the aggregate amount of ~~$258,097.~~$56,840. Matthew Frey, the son-in-law of Paul C. Reilly, is aan independent branch owner, manager ~~of one of the independent branches of our subsidiary~~and financial adviser affiliated with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. ~~He was paid~~and earned cash compensation ~~during~~(net of ordinary-course fees to the ~~period reported on~~company) of ~~$536,628.~~

~~Mr.~~$2,046,166 out of which he pays all general office expenses, payroll and other costs of branch operations, and splits net earnings with his partner. Francis S. Godbold ~~our Vice Chairman and a director, is~~earned cash compensation of $167,389. (Mr. Godbold, who retired from the Board following the 2022 Annual Meeting, was compensated as an employee and ~~does~~did not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director. ~~He was paid~~) Christopher Shoukry, the brother of Paul M. Shoukry, serves as Vice President with Alex. Brown, a division of the company, and earned cash compensation ~~during the period reported on~~of $442,943 and received RSUs in the amount of ~~$160,777.~~$47,571.

Transactions with 5% Shareholders.We and our affiliates engage in ordinary-course trading, arrangements relating to the placement of investment funds and ETFs on our Private Client Group platform, and other transactions or arrangements with, and may from time to time provide other ordinary-course investment banking or other financial services to, The Vanguard Group and its affiliates, related entities and clients. These transactions are negotiated on arm’s-length bases and contain customary terms and conditions. The Vanguard Group is an investment manager or sponsor to mutual funds that are investment options in our 401(k) Plan. The selection of the Vanguard mutual funds as investment options is unrelated to Vanguard’s common stock ownership. We believe that the fees paid to The Vanguard Group through the Vanguard mutual funds are the same as the fees that are paid by the other holders of the same share class of those funds.

~~RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY~~We and our affiliates engage in ordinary-course trading, arrangements relating to the placement of investment funds and ETFs on our Private Client Group platform, and other transactions or arrangements with, and may from time to time provide other ordinary-course investment banking or other financial services to, BlackRock, Inc., and its affiliates, related entities and clients. These transactions are negotiated on arm’s–length bases and contain customary terms and conditions.

Related Person Transaction Policy

The ~~CGN&C~~Corporate Governance and ESG Committee (the "CG&ESG Committee") maintains Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions to address the review, approval, disapproval or ratification of related person transactions. ~~‘‘Related persons’’ include~~ “Related persons” include:

•the company’s

executive officers ~~directors, director nominees,~~

•holders of more than ~~five percent (5%)~~5% of the company’s voting securities

•the company’s directors

•immediate family members of the foregoing persons ~~and~~

•the company’s director nominees

•any entity in which ~~any of the foregoing persons is employed, is~~ a ~~partner or is in a similar position, or in which such~~ person has a 5% or greater ownership ~~interest.~~ interest or that is otherwise under the “control” of such person

A ~~‘‘related~~“related person ~~transaction’’~~transaction” means (with certain exceptions permitted by SEC rules) a transaction or series of transactions in ~~which~~ which:

•the company participates

•the amount involved exceeds $120,000 ~~and~~

•a related person has a direct or indirect material interest ~~(with certain exceptions permitted by SEC rules).~~

Examples might include sales, purchases and transfers of real or personal property, use of property and equipment by lease or otherwise, services received or furnished and borrowings and lendings, including guarantees.

Management is required to present for the approval or ratification of the ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee all material information regarding an actual or potential related person transaction. The policy requires that, after reviewing such information, the disinterested members of the ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee will approve or disapprove the transaction. Approval will be given only if the ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee determines that such transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the company and its shareholders. The policy further requires that in the event management becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, it must be submitted to the ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee promptly. The policy also permits the ~~chairman~~chair of the ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee to review and approve related person transactions in accordance with the terms of the policy between scheduled committee meetings. Any determination made pursuant to this delegated authority must be reported to the full ~~CGN&C~~CG&ESG Committee at the next ~~regularly-scheduled~~regularly scheduled meeting.

~~EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION~~

The following table summarizes equity compensation plan information for the plans approved by shareholders, as a group, and for the plans not approved by shareholders, as a group, in each case as of September 30, 2017. In accordance with SEC rules, the table below does not include our Profit Sharing Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights⁽¹⁾ (b)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans. (Excludes securities
reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders⁽²⁾
3,084,790 $51.74 16,158,903
(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders⁽⁴⁾
0 $0.00 —

Total 3,084,790 $51.74 16,158,903

~~_______________~~


86

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting


Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a Proxy Statement?			You have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy materials because Raymond James’s Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the virtual Annual Meeting on February 23, 2023. The materials include information that is designed to assist you in voting your shares and information that we are required to provide to you under the rules of the SEC. On January 11, 2023, we mailed either a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a package consisting of this Proxy Statement, a proxy card and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, (“Annual Report”) to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 21, 2022 (“Record Date”).

~~(1)~~Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, but no proxy materials?			Again this year we are distributing our Proxy Statement, proxy card and the Annual Report to certain shareholders via the Internet under the SEC’s “notice and access” rules. This approach conserves natural resources and reduces our printing and distribution costs, while providing a timely and convenient method of accessing the materials and voting. On January 11, 2023, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) to participating shareholders. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report on the Internet. The ~~weighted-average exercise price does not take into account~~Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a free printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the ~~shares or restricted stock units issued under our restricted stock and employee stock purchase plans, which have no exercise price.~~instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.


~~(2)~~Why are you holding a virtual meeting?			~~On February 23, 2012,~~Our 2023 Annual Meeting is being held on a virtual-only basis with no physical location. Our goal for the ~~2012 Stock Incentive Plan (as subsequently amended~~Annual Meeting is to enable the largest number of shareholders to participate in the meeting, while providing substantially the same access and ~~restated,~~possibilities for exchange with the ~~‘‘2012 Plan’’) was approved~~Board and our senior management as an in-person meeting. We believe that this approach represents best practices for virtual shareholder meetings, including by providing a support line for technical assistance and addressing as many shareholder questions as time allows.

Can I participate and ask questions in the virtual meeting?			Yes. We are committed to ensuring that our ~~shareholders. The 2012 Plan serves~~shareholders have substantially the same opportunities to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting. In order to submit a question, you will need your 16-digit control number that is printed on the ~~successor~~Notice or proxy card that you received in the mail, or via email if you have elected to our 1996 Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel, 2007 Stock Option Plan for Independent Contractors, 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, 2005 Restricted Stock Plan and 2007 Stock Bonus Plan (the ‘‘Predecessor Plans’’). Uponreceive material electronically. You may log in 15 minutes before the ~~original approval~~start of the ~~2012 Plan~~Annual Meeting and submit questions online. You will be able to submit questions during the Annual Meeting as well. You may also submit questions in advance of the meeting at www.proxyvote.com when you vote your shares. We encourage you to submit any question that is relevant to the business of the meeting.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			87

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting


How do I attend the virtual Annual Meeting, and what documentation must I provide to be admitted?			In order to participate in the Annual Meeting, please log on to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RJF2023 at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to provide time to register and download the required software, if needed. If you are a shareholder of record, you will need to provide your 16-digit control number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you receive a printed copy of the proxy materials) in order to be able to participate in the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner (if, for example, your shares are not registered in your name but are held in “street name” for you by your broker, bank or other institution), you must follow the instructions printed on your Voting Instruction Form. The webcast replay will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RJF2023 until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you access the meeting but do not enter your control number, you will be able to listen to the proceedings, but you will not be able to vote or otherwise participate.

How can I vote online at the virtual Annual Meeting?			If you are a shareholder of record and provide your 16-digit control number when you access the meeting, you may vote all shares registered in your name during the Annual Meeting webcast. If you are a beneficial owner as to any of your shares (i.e., instead of being registered in your name, all or a portion of your shares are registered in “street name” and held by your broker, bank or other institution for your benefit), you must follow the instructions printed on your Voting Instruction Form.

What if I have technical or other “IT” problems logging into or participating in the virtual Annual Meeting?			We have provided a toll-free technical support “help line” that can be accessed by any shareholder who is having challenges logging into or participating in the virtual Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support line number that will be posted on the Virtual Annual Meeting login page.

What is a proxy?			A “proxy” is a written authorization from you to another person that allows such person (the “proxy holder”) to vote your shares on your behalf. The Board of Directors is asking you to allow either of the following persons to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting: Paul C. Reilly, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, or Thomas A. James, Chair Emeritus.

Who is entitled to vote?			Each Raymond James shareholder of record on the Record Date for the Annual Meeting is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder “of record” and as a “beneficial owner”?			•Shareholders of Record. You are a shareholder of record if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare, our transfer agent. •Beneficial Owner.You are a beneficial owner if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were held by a brokerage firm or other nominee and not in your name. Being a beneficial owner means that, like most of our shareholders, your shares are held in “street name” (meaning in the ~~Predecessor Plans terminated (except~~name of your brokerage firm or other financial institution). As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will only be permitted to vote your shares with respect to ~~awards previously granted under the Predecessor Plans that remained outstanding). Upon the original approval~~some of the ~~2012 Plan, our shareholders also approved the grant~~proposals, but not all. Please see “What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” for additional information. •Raymond James has requested banks, brokerage firms and other nominees who hold Raymond James shares on behalf of ~~15,400,000 new shares, in addition to~~beneficial owners of the shares ~~then available~~as of the close of business on the Record Date to forward the Notice or proxy materials to those beneficial owners. Raymond James has agreed to pay the reasonable expenses of the banks, brokerage firms and other nominees for ~~grant under~~forwarding these materials.


88

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting


How many votes do I have?			Every holder of a share of common stock on the ~~Predecessor Plans.~~Record Date will be entitled to one vote per share for each Director to be elected at the Annual Meeting and to one vote per share on each other matter presented at the Annual Meeting. On ~~February 23, 2016, our shareholders approved~~the Record Date there were 216,141,235 shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What proposals are being presented at the virtual Annual Meeting?			Raymond James intends to present proposals numbered one through five for shareholder consideration and voting at the Annual Meeting. These proposals are for: 1.Election of the ten (10) director nominees named in the Proxy Statement; 2.Advisory vote to approve executive compensation (“say-on-pay”); 3.Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation; 4.Approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive ~~Plan, which included an increase~~Plan; and 5.Ratification of ~~16,000,000 shares available for issuance under~~ the ~~plan.~~appointment of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, Raymond James does not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxies received from our shareholders give the proxy holders the authority to vote on such matter in their discretion.


~~(3)~~How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?			~~Includes 15,297,117 shares remaining available~~ The Board of Directors recommends that you vote: •FOR the election of the ten (10) directors nominated by our Board and named in this proxy statement; •FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (“say-on-pay”); •FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the option of once “every year” as the preferred frequency for ~~issuance under~~advisory votes on executive compensation; •FOR the approval of the Amended and Restated 2012 ~~Plan~~Stock Incentive Plan; and ~~861,786 shares remaining available for issuance under~~ •FOR ratification of the ~~2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,~~appointment of KPMG LLP as ~~amended, as of September 30, 2017.~~the company’s independent registered public accounting firm.


~~(4)~~ How do I vote by proxy and what are the voting deadlines?			~~We have two Predecessor Plans~~ You may vote your shares at the virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy: •Via the Internet: You can submit a proxy via the Internet until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2023, by accessing the website at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions you will find on the website. Internet proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. You will be given the opportunity to confirm that ~~were not previously approved by shareholders: the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel and the Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors. All previously outstanding shares~~your instructions have been ~~exercised~~properly recorded. •By Mail: If you have received your proxy materials by mail, you can vote by marking, dating and signing your proxy card and returning it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you hold your shares in an account with a bank or ~~otherwise disposed of.~~broker (i.e., in “street name”), you can vote by following the instructions on the voting instruction card provided to you by your bank or broker. Proxy cards returned by mail must be received no later than the close of business on February 22, 2023. •By Telephone: You can submit a proxy by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2023, by calling toll-free 1-800-690-6903 (from the U.S. and Canada) and following the instructions.

~~SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE~~

Based solely on its review of copies of such reports, the company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders were complied with during fiscal year 2017.

~~PROPOSAL NO. 2~~

~~ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

~~General~~

Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 enables our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a ‘‘say-on-pay’’ proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we seek to establish and maintain compensation policies that will enable us to attract, motivate and retain high-quality executive officers and ensure that their individual interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our goal is to utilize our compensation programs to reward executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and increased total shareholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Our executive officers’ total compensation is comprised of a mix of base salary, annual incentive bonus (which includes both cash and time- and performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards), grants of retention restricted stock units, and retirement plan contributions. The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) does not utilize formulaic financial performance goals or targets in awarding compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews company and individual performance each year, and then applies its broad discretion in determining the appropriate amounts of compensation for the fiscal year, based on a variety of factors, both objective and subjective.

~~Summary of Compensation Decisions for 2017~~

Total Annual Direct Compensation
Named Executive Officer Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2016 Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
Paul C. Reilly $11,090,000 $8,414,400 31.80%
Jeffrey P. Julien $3,121,500 $2,689,700 16.05%
John C. Carson, Jr. $3,391,500 $3,559,700 (4.73)%
Jeffrey E. Trocin $4,246,500 $2,564,661 65.58%
Dennis W. Zank $4,021,500 $3,689,700 8.99%

This table depicts how the Committee viewed its compensation decisions for our NEOs, but the presentation herein differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table (‘‘SCT’’) on page 39 that is required by SEC rules. This table is not a substitute for the information presented in the SCT. Among other differences, the table above includes equity awards in the column for the year they were earned, rather than the year in which the grant date occurred. Please see the note on page 32 for further important information on the differences between this presentation and the SCT.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			89

~~Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote ‘‘FOR’’ the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:~~

‘‘~~RESOLVED~~, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting

of Shareholders pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.’’

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the CGN&C Committee or our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors and our CGN&C Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and the CGN&C Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. Under the Board’s current policy, shareholders are given an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on this topic annually, with the next opportunity occurring in connection with the company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2019.

~~RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD~~

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘‘FOR’’ THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. ~~The voting requirements for this proposal are described in the ‘‘~~Questions and Answers ~~About Voting Your Shares’’ section above.~~

~~PROPOSAL NO. 3~~

~~RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF~~

~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

~~GENERAL~~

The Audit and Risk Committee of the Board has appointed KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 and to audit the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018.

~~Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at~~about the Annual Meeting ~~and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.~~

~~RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD~~

~~THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘‘~~
~~FOR’’ RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2018.~~ ~~The voting requirements for this proposal are described in the ‘‘~~


			Even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting online, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy using one of the methods described above. Raymond James shareholders of record who attend the virtual meeting may vote their shares online, even though they have sent in proxies.

What if my shares are held in the Raymond James ESOP?			For participants in the Raymond James Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”), your shares will be voted as you instruct the trustee of the ESOP. There are three ways to vote: via the Internet, by returning your proxy card, or by telephone. Please follow the instructions included on your proxy card on how to vote using one of the three methods. Your vote will serve as voting instructions to the trustee of the ESOP for shares allocated to your account. If you do not vote shares allocated to your account held in the ESOP, your shares will nevertheless be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as it votes the shares of ESOP participants who have instructed the trustee on how to vote. You cannot vote your ESOP shares at the virtual meeting. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustee of the ESOP, our transfer agent must receive your vote by no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 20, 2023.

How do I submit a question during the virtual Annual Meeting?			Each year at the Annual Meeting, we hold a question-and-answer session following the formal business portion of the meeting during which shareholders may submit questions to us. We anticipate having such a question-and-answer session at the 2023 Annual Meeting. If you would like to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, once you have logged into the webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RJF2023, simply type your question in the “ask a question” box and click “submit.” Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting as time allows.

When should I submit my question?			You may submit questions during the meeting as outlined above, and in advance of the meeting via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com when you vote your shares. You can also submit a question up to 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting and up until the time we indicate that the question-and-answer session is concluded. However, we encourage you to submit your questions before or during the formal business portion of the meeting and our prepared statements, in advance of the question-and-answer session, in order to ensure that there is adequate time to address questions in an orderly manner.

May I change or revoke my vote?			Yes. You may change your vote in one of several ways at any time before it is exercised: •Grant a subsequent proxy via the Internet or telephone; •Submit another proxy card (or voting instruction card) with a date later than your previously delivered proxy; •Notify our company secretary in writing before the Annual Meeting that you are revoking your proxy or, if you hold your shares in “street name,” follow the instructions on the voting instruction card; or •If you are a shareholder of record, or a beneficial owner with a proxy from the shareholder of record, vote online while logged in and participating in the virtual Annual Meeting.


90

Questions and Answers ~~About Voting Your Shares’’ section of this Proxy Statement. If~~about the ~~proposal to ratify~~Annual Meeting


What will happen if I do not vote my shares?			•Shareholders of Record. If you are the shareholder of record of your shares and you do not vote in person at the Annual Meeting, or by proxy via the Internet, by mail, or by telephone, your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting. •Beneficial Owners. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, your broker or nominee may vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has discretion to vote. Under the rules of the NYSE, your broker or nominee has discretion to vote your shares on routine matters, such as Proposal 5, but does not have discretion to vote your shares on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4. Therefore, if you do not instruct your broker as to how to vote your shares on Proposals 1, 2, 3 or 4, this would be a “broker non-vote,” and your shares would not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal. We therefore strongly encourage you to instruct your broker or nominee on how you wish to vote your shares.

What is the effect of a broker non-vote or abstention?			Under NYSE rules, brokers or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. Pursuant to our By-laws, broker non-votes and abstentions are not counted as “votes cast” on such matter, but are counted for quorum purposes.

What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted?			•Shareholders of Record. If you are a shareholder of record and you submit a signed proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, all of your shares will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2, 4 and 5, and FOR once “every year” on Proposal 3. •Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under NYSE rules, brokers and other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters, such as Proposal 5, but do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee may only vote your shares on Proposal 5 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or set of printed proxy materials?			It means you own Raymond James shares in more than one account, such as individually and jointly with your spouse. Please vote all of your shares. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials may contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of such document(s) be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future. In addition, if you are the beneficial owner, your broker, bank or other nominee may deliver only one copy of the proxy materials to multiple shareholders who share an address unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the beneficial owners. Raymond James will deliver promptly, upon request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of such document(s) was delivered. Shareholders who wish to receive a separate written copy of such documents, now or in the future, should submit their request to our company secretary by writing Raymond James Financial, Inc., Attn: Jonathan N. Santelli, General Counsel and Secretary, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716.

What is a quorum?			A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders representing a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the company entitled to vote at the meeting constitutes a quorum for the conduct of business.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			91

Questions and Answers about the ~~appointment is not approved, the Audit and Risk Committee will reconsider the selection of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm~~Annual Meeting

, but still may determine that the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. Even if the appointment is ratified by the shareholders, the Audit and Risk Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit and Risk Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

~~ADDITIONAL INFORMATION~~


What vote is required in order to approve each proposal?			For Proposals 1, 2, 4 and 5, the affirmative vote of a majority of the “votes cast” on such proposal at the Annual Meeting is required. Our By-laws provide that a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” such proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as “votes cast” with respect to such proposal. (In the case of any contested director election, directors are elected by a plurality of the “votes cast.”) Proposal 3 asks shareholders to select a preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of every year, every two years, or every three years (or abstain). For Proposal 3, the frequency receiving the greatest number of votes will be considered the frequency preferred by shareholders.

How will voting on any other business be conducted?			Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, we do not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on the matter in their discretion.

What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed?			Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled Annual Meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

Who will count the votes?			Our general counsel and company secretary will act as the inspector of election and will tabulate the votes.

How can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?			Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four (4) business days after the Annual Meeting.

Who is paying for the costs of this proxy solicitation?			We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., to solicit proxies for a fee of approximately $15,000 plus a reasonable amount to cover expenses. Proxies may also be solicited in person, by telephone or electronically by Raymond James personnel who will not receive additional compensation for such solicitation. Copies of proxy materials and our Annual Report will be supplied to brokers and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from beneficial owners, and we will reimburse such brokers or other nominees for their reasonable expenses.


92

Additional Information

Costs of Solicitation

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be paid by Raymond James. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., to solicit proxies for a fee of approximately $15,000 plus a reasonable amount to cover expenses. Proxies may also be solicited in person, by telephone or electronically by Raymond James personnel who will not receive additional compensation for such solicitation. Copies of proxy materials and our Annual Report on Form 10-K will be supplied to brokers and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from beneficial owners, and we will reimburse such brokers or other nominees for their reasonable expenses.

Principal Executive Offices

The principal executive offices of Raymond James are located at 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716, and the telephone number there is 727-567-1000.

Shareholder Proposals for the ~~2019~~2024 Annual Meeting

In accordance with the rules established by the SEC, any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting of shareholders must be received by the company no later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date of this proxy statement (~~e.g.~~(e.g., not later than September ~~10, 2018)~~13, 2023). Such proposals should be sent in writing to Raymond James Financial, Inc., Attn: Jonathan N. Santelli, General Counsel and Company Secretary, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716. To be included in the Proxy Statement, the proposal must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC and our By-laws, and must be a proper subject for shareholder action under Florida law.

A shareholder may otherwise propose business for consideration or nominate persons for election to the Board in compliance with SEC proxy rules, Florida law, our By-laws and other legal requirements, without seeking to have the proposal included in Raymond James’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Under our By-laws, notice of such a proposal must generally be provided to our ~~Secretary~~company secretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. The period under our By-laws for receipt of such proposals for next year’s meeting is thus from October ~~25, 2018~~26, 2023 to November ~~24, 2018.~~27, 2023. (However, if the date of the ~~Annual~~annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, any notice by a shareholder of business or the nomination of directors for election or reelection to be brought before the annual meeting to be timely must be so delivered (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 120thday prior to such annual meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of (A) the 90thday prior to such annual meeting and (B) the 10thday following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.)

Under Rule 14a-4 under the Exchange Act, proxies may be voted on matters properly brought before a meeting under these procedures in the discretion of the proxy holders, without additional proxy statement disclosure about the matter, unless Raymond James is notified about the matter not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting and the proponents otherwise satisfy the requirements of Rule 14a-4. The period under our By-laws for receipt of such proposals for next year’s meeting is from October ~~25, 2018~~26, 2023 to November ~~24, 2018.~~27, 2023.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			93

Additional Information

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Reports

A copy of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including financial statements, for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 (the ~~‘‘Annual Report’’~~“Annual Report”), is being furnished or made available concurrently herewith to all shareholders holding shares as of the Record Date. Please read it carefully.

Shareholders may also obtain additional copies of the Annual Report, without charge, by visiting the company’s ~~Web site~~website at www.raymondjames.comor by submitting a request to our ~~Secretary~~general counsel and company secretary by writing Raymond James Financial, Inc., Attn: General Counsel and Company Secretary, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716. Upon request to our ~~Secretary,~~company secretary, the exhibits set

forth on the exhibit index of the Annual Report may be made available at a reasonable charge (which will be limited to our reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits).

~~Communications with the Lead Director and Non-Executive Directors~~

~~Any interested party may communicate with the Lead Director of our Board, Ms. Susan N. Story, or with our non-executive directors as a group, by writing to the following address:~~

~~Raymond James Financial, Inc.~~

~~880 Carillon Parkway~~

~~St. Petersburg, Florida 33716~~

~~Attn: Secretary~~

Communications will be reviewed by our corporate secretary and distributed to the Lead Director, the Board, or to any of the Board’s committees or individual directors as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances of the communication. In that regard, the Raymond James Board does not receive certain items which are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board.

In addition, the company maintains a Confidential Reporting Hotline for its employees or individuals outside the company to report complaints or concerns on an anonymous and confidential basis regarding questionable accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and possible violations of the company’s Code of Conduct or law. Further information about the Raymond James Confidential Reporting Hotline is available on the company’s Web site.

Non-employees may submit any complaint regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters directly to the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors by sending a written communication to the address given below:

~~Audit and Risk Committee~~

~~Raymond James Financial, Inc.~~

~~880 Carillon Parkway~~

~~St. Petersburg, Florida 33716~~

~~Attn: General Counsel~~

Householding of Proxy Materials

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for the Notice (or proxy ~~statements and annual reports~~materials in the case of shareholders who receive paper copies of such materials) with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice, (or set of paper proxy ~~statement and annual report~~materials), addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as ~~‘‘householding,’’~~“householding,” potentially means extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.

A number of banks and brokers with account holders who are beneficial holders of the company’s shares will be householding the company’s Notice (or proxy ~~materials.~~materials). Accordingly, a single copy of the Notice (or proxy ~~materials~~materials) will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. ~~If,~~To receive a separate copy of the Notice (or proxy materials), or if, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive separate copies of any future notices (or proxy ~~materials,~~materials), please notify your bank or broker, or contact our ~~Secretary~~general counsel and company secretary at 727-567-5185 or by mail to Raymond James Financial, Inc., Attn: Jonathan N. Santelli, General Counsel and Company Secretary, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716. The company undertakes, upon oral or written request to the address or telephone number above, to deliver promptly a separate copy of the company’s notices (or proxy ~~materials~~materials) to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the applicable document was delivered. Shareholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notice or proxy materials at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker or the company’s Investor Relations Department at the contact address and telephone number provided above.


94

Appendix A

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP Financial Measures (Unaudited)

We utilize certain non-GAAP financial measures as additional measures to aid in, and enhance, the understanding of our financial results and related measures. These non-GAAP financial measures include adjusted net income available to common shareholders, adjusted earnings per diluted share, and adjusted return on common equity. We believe certain of these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to management and investors by excluding certain material items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. We utilize these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing the financial performance of the business, as they facilitate a meaningful comparison of current- and prior-period results. In fiscal 2022, certain of our non-GAAP financial measures were adjusted for additional expenses directly related to our acquisitions that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results, including acquisition-related retention, amortization of identifiable intangible assets arising from our acquisitions, and the initial provision for credit losses on loans acquired and lending commitments assumed as a result of the TriState Capital acquisition. In the following tables, the tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments reflects the statutory rate associated with each non-GAAP item. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other companies. The following tables provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for the periods indicated.

The three-year average Adjusted ROE applied to determine vesting of the 2019 awards was calculated using the Adjusted ROE figures set forth in the following Periodic Reports on Form 8-K: (i) fiscal 2022: filed October 26, 2022; and (ii) fiscal 2021 and 2020: filed October 27, 2021. The Adjusted ROE for fiscal 2022 reflected the aforementioned acquisition-related expense adjustments, while the Adjusted ROE for fiscal 2021 and 2020 was not revised to reflect such adjustments.


			Year ended September 30,
$ in millions			2022
Net income available to common shareholders			$1,505
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Expenses directly related to acquisitions included in the following financial statement line items:
Compensation, commissions and benefits:
Acquisition-related retention(1)			58
Other acquisition-related compensation(2)			2
Total “Compensation, commissions and benefits” expense			60
Professional fees(2)			12
Bank loan provision/(benefit) for credit losses — initial provision for credit losses on acquired loans(3)			26
Other:
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets(4)			33
Initial provision for credit losses on acquired lending commitments(3)			5
All other acquisition-related expenses(2)			11
Total “Other” expense			49
Total expenses related to acquisitions			147
Pre-tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments			147
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments			(37)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax			110
Adjusted net income available to common shareholders			$1,615


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			95

Appendix A


	Year ended September 30,
$ in millions	2022
Diluted earnings per common share	$—
Impact of non-GAAP adjustments on diluted earnings per common share:
Compensation, commissions and benefits:
Acquisition-related retention(1)	0.27
Other acquisition-related compensation(2)	0.01
Total “Compensation, commissions and benefits” expense	0.28
Professional fees(2)	0.06
Bank loan provision/(benefit) for credit losses — Initial provision for credit losses on acquired loans(3)	0.12
Other:
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets(4)	0.15
Initial provision for credit losses on acquired lending commitments(3)	0.02
All other acquisition-related expenses(2)	0.05
Total “Other” expense	0.22
Total expenses related to acquisitions	0.68
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments	(0.17)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax	0.51
Adjusted diluted earnings per common share(5)	$—

Average common equity(6)	$8,836
Impact of non-GAAP adjustments on average common equity:
Compensation, commissions and benefits:
Acquisition-related retention(1)	27
Other acquisition-related compensation(2)	1
Total “Compensation, commissions and benefits” expense	28
Professional fees(2)	6
Bank loan provision/(benefit) for credit losses — Initial provision for credit losses on acquired loans(3)	10
Other:
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets(4)	16
Initial provision for credit losses on acquired lending commitments(3)	2
All other acquisition-related expenses(2)	6
Total “Other” expense	24
Total expenses related to acquisitions	68
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments	(17)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax	51
Adjusted average common equity(6)	$8,887
Return on common equity(7)	17.0	%
Adjusted return on common equity(7)	18.2	%


96

Appendix A


	Year ended September 30,
$ in millions, except per share amounts		2021		2020
Net income		$1,403		$818
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Losses on extinguishment of debt(8)		98		—
Acquisition and disposition-related expenses(2) (4)		19		7
Reduction in workforce expenses(9)		—		46
Pre-tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments		117		53
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments		(28)		(13)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax		89		40
Adjusted net income		$1,492		$858

Earnings per diluted share		$6.63		$3.88
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Losses on extinguishment of debt(8)		0.46		—
Acquisition and disposition-related expenses(2)(4)		0.09		0.03
Reduction in workforce expenses(9)		—		0.22
Pre-tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments		0.55		0.25
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments		(0.13)		(0.05)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax		0.42		0.20
Adjusted earnings per diluted share(5)		$7.05		$4.08

Average common equity(6)		$7,635		$6,860
Impact on average equity of non-GAAP adjustments:
Losses on extinguishment of debt(8)		39		—
Acquisition and disposition-related expenses(2)(4)		6		1
Reduction in workforce expenses(9)		—		9
Pre-tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments		45		10
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments		(11)		(2)
Total non-GAAP adjustments, net of tax		34		8
Adjusted common average equity(6)		$7,669		$6,868
Return on common equity(7)		18.4	%	11.9	%
Adjusted return on common equity(7)		19.5	%	12.5	%

(1)Includes acquisition-related compensation expenses arising from equity and cash-based retention awards issued in conjunction with acquisitions in the current year and in prior years. Such retention awards are generally contingent upon the post-closing continuation of service of certain associates who joined the firm as part of such acquisitions and are expensed over the requisite service period.

(2)In fiscal 2022, we reclassified acquisition-related expenses which were previously reported in “Acquisition-related expenses” on our Consolidated Statements of Income into the respective income statement line items that align to their expense categories, including “Compensation, commissions, and benefits”, “Professional fees” (primarily legal fees), and “Other” expenses. Fiscal 2021 and 2020 periods have not been conformed to the fiscal 2022 presentation for purposes of NEO compensation vesting calculations.

(3)Our results for the twelve months ended September 30, 2022 included an initial provision for credit losses on loans and lending commitments acquired as part of our TriState Capital acquisition of $26 million (included in “Bank loan provision/(benefit) for credit losses”) and $5 million (included in “Other” expense), respectively. These provisions were required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be recorded in earnings in the reporting period following the acquisition date.

(4)For fiscal 2022, amortization of identifiable intangible assets was included in “Other” expense and included amortization of identifiable intangible assets arising from our fiscal 2022 acquisitions as well as those in prior years. For fiscal 2021 and 2020, “Acquisition and disposition-related expenses” included amortization of identifiable intangible assets of those identifiable intangible assets with short useful lives arising from our acquisitions for fiscal 2021 and 2020.

(5)Earnings per diluted common share is computed by dividing net income (less allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities) by weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding for each respective period or, in the case of adjusted earnings per diluted share, computed by dividing adjusted net income (less allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities) by weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding for each respective period.

(6)For the fiscal year, average common equity is computed by adding the total common equity attributable to Raymond James Financial, Inc. as of each quarter-end date during the indicated period to the beginning of year total, and dividing by five. Adjusted average common equity is computed by adjusting for the impact on average common equity of the non-GAAP adjustments, as applicable for each respective period.

(7)Return on common equity is computed by dividing net income by average common equity for each respective period or, in the case of adjusted return on common equity, computed by dividing adjusted net income available to common shareholders by adjusted average equity for each respective period.

(8)Losses on extinguishment of debt include make-whole premiums, the accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs, and certain legal and other professional fees associated with the redemptions of our $250 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2024 and our $500 million of 3.625% senior notes due 2026, which occurred during our fiscal third quarter of 2021.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			97

Appendix A

(9)Reduction in workforce expenses for the 12 months ended September 30, 2020, are associated with position eliminations that occurred in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2020 in response to the economic environment. These expenses were included in our Other segment and primarily consisted of severance and related payroll expenses, as well as expenses related to company-paid benefits.


98

Appendix B

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(as amended through February 22, 2023)

(1)Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentives to Employees, Directors and Independent Contractors and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

(2)Definitions. The following definitions shall apply as used herein and in the individual Award Agreements except as defined otherwise in an individual Award Agreement. In the event a term is separately defined in an individual Award Agreement, such definition shall supersede the definition contained in this Section 2.

(a)“Administrator” means the Board or the Committee.

(b)“Affiliate” and “Associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

(c)“Applicable Laws” means the legal requirements relating to the Plan and the Awards under applicable provisions of federal securities laws, state corporate and securities laws, the Code, the legal requirements of any applicable stock exchange or national market system, and the legal requirements of any non-U.S. jurisdiction applicable to Awards granted to residents therein.

(d)“Assumed” means that pursuant to a Corporate Transaction either (i) the Award is expressly affirmed by the Company or (ii) the contractual obligations represented by the Award are expressly assumed (and not simply by operation of law) by the successor entity or its Parent in connection with the Corporate Transaction with appropriate adjustments to the number and type of securities of the successor entity or its Parent subject to the Award and the exercise or purchase price thereof which at least preserves the compensation element of the Award existing at the time of the Corporate Transaction as determined in accordance with the instruments evidencing the agreement to assume the Award.

(e)“Award” means the grant of an Option, SAR, Dividend Equivalent Right, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Cash-Based Award or other right or benefit under the Plan.

(f)“Award Agreement” means the written agreement evidencing the grant of an Award executed by the Company and the Grantee, including any amendments thereto.

(g)“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(h)“Cash-Based Award” means an award denominated in cash that may be settled in cash and/or Shares, which may be subject to restrictions, as established by the Administrator.

(i)“Cause” means, with respect to the termination by the Company or a Related Entity of the Grantee’s Continuous Service, that such termination is for “Cause” as such term (or word of like import) is expressly defined in a then-effective written agreement between the Grantee and the Company or such Related Entity (including, but not limited to, the Award Agreement for a particular Award), or in the absence of such then-effective written agreement and definition, is based on, in the determination of the Administrator, the Grantee’s: (i) continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his or her position after there has been delivered to the Grantee a written demand for performance from the Company which describes the basis for the Company’s belief that the Grantee has not substantially performed his or her duties and the Grantee has not corrected such failure within thirty (30) days of such written demand; (ii) dishonesty, intentional misconduct, breach of a confidentiality agreement with the Company or a Related Entity or material breach of any other agreement with the Company or a Related Entity; (iii) breach of any fiduciary duty owed to the Company by the Grantee that has a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business; or (iv) conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or physical or emotional harm to any person; provided, however, that with regard to any agreement that defines “Cause” on the occurrence of or in connection with a Corporate Transaction or a Change in Control, such definition of “Cause” shall not apply until a Corporate Transaction or a Change in Control actually occurs.

(j)“Change in Control” means a change in ownership or control of the Company effected through either of the following transactions:

(i)the direct or indirect acquisition by any person or related group of persons (other than an acquisition from or by the Company or by a Company-sponsored employee benefit plan or by a person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the Company’s stockholders which a majority of the Continuing Directors who are not Affiliates or Associates of the offeror do not recommend such stockholders accept, or


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			99

Appendix B

(ii)a change in the composition of the Board over a period of twelve (12) months or less such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number) ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who are Continuing Directors.

provided that, for purposes of Awards granted hereunder that are subject to Section 409A and with respect to which payment or settlement of the Awards would occur in connection with the transaction, the transaction must also constitute a “change in the ownership or effective control, or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” (as defined in Section 409A) of the Company.

(k)“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(l)“Committee” means the Compensation and Talent Committee of the Board.

(m)“Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.

(n)“Company” means Raymond James Financial, Inc. a Florida corporation, or any successor entity that adopts the Plan in connection with a Corporate Transaction.

(o)“Continuing Directors” means members of the Board who either (i) have been Board members continuously for a period of at least twelve (12) months or (ii) have been Board members for less than twelve (12) months and were elected or nominated for election as Board members by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (i) who were still in office at the time such election or nomination was approved by the Board.

(p)“Continuous Service” means that the provision of services to the Company or a Related Entity in any capacity of Employee, Director or Independent Contractor is not interrupted or terminated. In jurisdictions requiring notice in advance of an effective termination as an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor, Continuous Service shall be deemed terminated upon the actual cessation of providing services to the Company or a Related Entity notwithstanding any required notice period that must be fulfilled before a termination as an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor can be effective under Applicable Laws. A Grantee’s Continuous Service shall be deemed to have terminated either upon an actual termination of Continuous Service or upon the entity for which the Grantee provides services ceasing to be a Related Entity. Continuous Service shall not be considered interrupted in the case of (i) any approved leave of absence, (ii) transfers among the Company, any Related Entity, or any successor, in any capacity of Employee, Director or Independent Contractor, or (iii) any change in status as long as the individual remains in the service of the Company or a Related Entity in any capacity of Employee, Director or Independent Contractor (except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may determine that, in the event of any spin-off of a Related Entity, service as an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor for such Related Entity following such spin-off shall be deemed to be Continuous Service for purposes of the Plan and any Award under the Plan. An approved leave of absence shall include sick leave, military leave, or any other authorized personal leave. For purposes of each Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan, if such leave exceeds three (3) months, and reemployment upon expiration of such leave is not guaranteed by statute or contract, then the Incentive Stock Option shall be treated as a Non-Qualified Stock Option on the day three (3) months and one (1) day following the expiration of such three (3) month period.

(q)“Corporate Transaction” means any of the following transactions, provided, however, that the Administrator shall determine under parts (iv) and (v) whether multiple transactions are related, and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive:

(i)a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving entity or a share exchange in which the Company becomes a subsidiary of another entity, except for a transaction the principal purpose of which is to change the state in which the Company is incorporated;

(ii)the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company;

(iii)the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company;

(iv)any reverse merger or series of related transactions culminating in a reverse merger (including, but not limited to, a tender offer followed by a reverse merger) in which the Company is the surviving entity but (A) the shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger are converted or exchanged by virtue of the merger into other property, whether in the form of securities, cash or otherwise, or (B) in which securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities are transferred to a person or persons different from those who held such securities immediately prior to such merger or the initial transaction culminating in such merger, but excluding any such transaction or series of related transactions that the Administrator determines shall not be a Corporate Transaction; or

(v)acquisition in a single or series of related transactions by any person or related group of persons (other than the Company or by a Company-sponsored employee benefit plan) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding securities but excluding any such transaction or series of related transactions that the Administrator determines shall not be a Corporate Transaction; provided that, for purposes of Awards granted hereunder that are subject to Section 409A and with respect to which payment or settlement of the Awards would occur in connection with the transaction, the transaction must also constitute a “change in the ownership or effective control, or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” (as defined in Section 409A) of the Company.


100

Appendix B

(r)“Covered Employee” means an Employee who is a “covered employee” under Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.

(s)“Director” means a member of the Board or the board of directors of any Related Entity.

(t)“Disability” means, unless such term (or word of like import) is expressly defined in a then-effective written agreement between the Grantee and the Company or such Related Entity (including, but not limited to, the Award Agreement for a particular Award), a permanent and total disability as determined under the long-term disability plan of the Company or the Related Entity to which the Grantee provides services unless the Grantee is not a participant in such long-term disability plan or in the absence of such long-term disability plan, in which case, “Disability” means a mental or physical condition which totally and presumably permanently prevents the Grantee from engaging in any substantial gainful employment with the Company or the Related Entity to which the Grantee provides services prior to the inception of the disability; provided that, for purposes of Awards granted hereunder that are subject to Section 409A, “Disability” means a disability within the meaning of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(C) and Treasury regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(4), as each may be amended from time to time. A Grantee will not be considered to have incurred a Disability unless he or she furnishes proof of such impairment sufficient to satisfy the Administrator in its discretion.

(u)“Dividend Equivalent Right” means aright entitling the Grantee to compensation measured by dividends paid with respect to Common Stock, provided that no such right may be granted with respect to Options or SARs. Dividend Equivalent Rights granted in connection with Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that performance vest shall be held subject to the vesting of the underlying Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

(v)“Employee” means any person, including an Officer or Director, who is in the employ of the Company or any Related Entity, subject to the control and direction of the Company or any Related Entity as to both the work to be performed and the manner and method of performance. The payment of a director’s fee by the Company or a Related Entity shall not be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.

(w)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(x)“Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:

(i)If the Common Stock is listed on one or more established stock exchanges or national market systems, including without limitation The New York Stock Exchange, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on the principal exchange or system on which the Common Stock is listed (as determined by the Administrator) on the date of determination (or, if no closing sales price or closing bid was reported on that date, as applicable, on the last trading date such closing sales price or closing bid was reported), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;

(ii)If the Common Stock is regularly quoted on an automated quotation system (including the OTC Bulletin Board) or by a recognized securities dealer, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock as quoted on such system or by such securities dealer on the date of determination, but if selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of determination (or, if no such prices were reported on that date, on the last date such prices were reported), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;

(iii)In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock of the type described in (i) and (ii), above, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined by the Administrator in good faith; or

(iv)In lieu of the foregoing, the Administrator may, from time to time, select any other index or measurement that the Administrator determines in good faith represents an appropriate determination of the Fair Market Value per share of the Common Stock for purposes of the Plan.

(y)“Good Reason” means, with respect to the termination by the Grantee of the Grantee’s Continuous Service, that such termination is for “Good Reason” as such term (or word of like import) is expressly defined in a then- effective written agreement between the Grantee and the Company or such Related Entity (including, but not limited to, the Award Agreement for a particular Award), or in the absence of such then-effective written agreement and definition, a termination within ninety (90) days following the end of the Cure Period (as defined below) as a result of the occurrence of any of the following without the Grantee’s written consent: (i) a material diminution of the Grantee’s authority, duties, or responsibilities, relative to the Grantee’s authority, duties, or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction; provided, however, that a reduction of authority, duties, or responsibilities that occurs solely as a necessary and direct consequence of the Company undergoing a Corporate Transaction or Change of Control and being made part of a larger entity will not be considered material; (ii) a material diminution by the Company in the Grantee’s total cash and equity-based compensation as in effect immediately prior to such reduction; or (iii) the relocation of the Grantee to a facility or a location more than fifty (50) miles from his or her then present location that requires the Grantee to commute more than fifty (50) miles one way; provided, however, that the Grantee must provide written notice to the Company of the condition that could constitute a “Good Reason” event within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of such condition and such condition must not have been remedied by the Company within thirty (30) days (the “Cure Period”) of such written notice.

(z)“Grantee” means an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor who receives an Award under the Plan.

(aa) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			101

Appendix B

(bb) "Independent Contractor” means any person entering into a registered representative contractual relationship with the Company or a Related Entity.

(cc) "Non-Qualified Stock Option” means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

(dd) "Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company or a Related Entity within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

(ee) "Option” means an option to purchase Shares pursuant to an Award Agreement granted under the Plan.

(ff) "Parent” means a “parent corporation”, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.

(gg) "Performance Period” means the period of time during which the performance goals must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to, or the amount or entitlement to, an Award.

(hh) "Plan” means this Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.

(ii) "Predecessor Plans” means the Company’s 1996 Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel, 2007 Stock Option Plan for Independent Contractors, 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, 2005 Restricted Stock Plan, and 2007 Stock Bonus Plan.

(jj) "Related Entity” means any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company.

(kk) "Replaced” means that pursuant to a Corporate Transaction the Award is replaced with a comparable stock or cash award or a cash incentive program of the Company, the successor entity (if applicable) or Parent of either of them which preserves the compensation element of such Award existing at the time of the Corporate Transaction and provides for subsequent payout in accordance with the same (or a more favorable) vesting schedule applicable to such Award. The determination of Award comparability shall be made by the Administrator and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.

(ll) "Restricted Stock” means Shares issued under the Plan to the Grantee for such consideration, if any, and subject to such restrictions on transfer, rights of first refusal, repurchase provisions, forfeiture provisions, and other terms and conditions as established by the Administrator. Dividends payable with respect to Restricted Stock subject to performance vesting shall be held subject to the vesting of the underlying Shares.

(mm)"Restricted Stock Units” means an Award which may be earned in whole or in part upon the passage of time or the attainment of performance criteria established by the Administrator and which may be settled for cash, Shares or other securities or a combination of cash, Shares or other securities as established by the Administrator.

(nn) "Retirement” means, unless such term (or word of like import) is expressly defined in a then-effective written agreement between the Grantee and the Company or such Related Entity (including, but not limited to, the Award Agreement for a particular Award), (i) in the case of an Employee or Independent Contractor, a Grantee’s voluntary Separation from Service or involuntary Separation from Service other than for Cause from the Company or any Related Entity after (A) attainment of age 65 or (B) attainment of age 60 after fifteen (15) years of service with the Company or a Related Entity either as an Employee or Independent Contractor, and (ii) in the case of a non-employee Director, a Grantee’s voluntary Separation from Service from the Company after attainment of age 72 or twelve (12) years of service as a Director with the Company.

(oo) "Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor thereto.

(pp) "SAR” means a stock appreciation right entitling the Grantee to Shares or cash compensation, as established by the Administrator, measured by appreciation in the value of Common Stock.

(qq) "Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code, and any proposed, temporary or final Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance thereunder, as each may be amended from time to time.

(rr) "Separation from Service” means a termination of Continuous Service from the Company and its Related Entities; provided that, for purposes of Awards granted hereunder that are subject to Section 409A, a “Separation from Service” means a Grantee’s death, retirement or other termination of employment or service with the Company and its Related Entities (as determined in accordance with Code Section 409A(2)(A)(i) and Treasury regulation section 1.409A(h), as each may be amended from time to time).

(ss) "Share” means a share of the Common Stock.

(tt) "Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation”, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

(3)Stock Subject to the Plan.

(a)Subject to the provisions of Section 10, below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards is 96,365,916 Shares, which includes the number of Shares that remained available for grants of awards under the Predecessor Plans as of the date the Plan was originally approved by the Company’s stockholders (8,843,944); provided, however, that the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options is 26,400,000 Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Shares issued in connection with Awards granted on or after the effective date of the Plan (as determined in accordance with Section 12) other than Options and SARs shall be counted against the limit set forth herein as 2.8 Shares for every one (1) Share issued in connection with such Award (and shall be counted as 2.8 Shares for every one (1) Share returned or deemed not


102

Appendix B

have been issued from the Plan pursuant to Section 3(b) below in connection with Awards granted on or after the effective date of the Plan (as determined in accordance with Section 12) other than Options and SARs). The Shares to be issued pursuant to Awards may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.

(b)Any Shares covered by an Award (or portion of an Award) which is forfeited, canceled or expires (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) shall be deemed not to have been issued for purposes of determining the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan. Shares that have been issued under the Plan pursuant to an Award shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan, except that if unvested Shares are forfeited, or repurchased by the Company at the lower of their original purchase price or their Fair Market Value at the time of repurchase, such Shares shall become available for future grant under the Plan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein: (i) Shares tendered or withheld in payment of an Option exercise price shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan; (ii) Shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available for future issuance under the Plan; and (iii) all Shares covered by the portion of an SAR that is exercised (whether or not Shares are actually issued to the Grantee upon exercise of the SAR) shall be considered issued pursuant to the Plan.

(4)Administration of the Plan.

(a)Plan Administrator.

(i)Administration with Respect to Directors and Officers. With respect to grants of Awards to Directors or Employees who are also Officers or Directors of the Company, the Plan shall be administered by the Committee which shall be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy the Applicable Laws and to permit such grants and related transactions under the Plan to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act in accordance with Rule 16b-3.

(ii)Administration With Respect to Independent Contractors and Other Employees. With respect to grants of Awards to Employees or Independent Contractors who are neither Directors nor Officers of the Company, the Plan shall be administered by the Committee which shall be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy the Applicable Laws. The Board may authorize one or more Officers to grant such Awards and may limit such authority as the Board determines from time to time.

(iii)Administration Errors. In the event an Award is granted in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of this subsection (a), such Award shall be presumptively valid as of its grant date to the extent permitted by the Applicable Laws.

(b)Powers of the Administrator. Subject to Applicable Laws and the provisions of the Plan (including any other powers given to the Administrator hereunder), and except as otherwise provided by the Board, the Administrator shall have the authority, in its discretion:

(i)to select the Employees, Directors and Independent Contractors to whom Awards may be granted from time to time hereunder;

(ii)to determine whether and to what extent Awards are granted hereunder;

(iii)to determine the number of Shares or the amount of cash or other consideration to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;

(iv)to approve forms of Award Agreements for use under the Plan;

(v)to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted hereunder;

(vi)to amend or waive the terms of any outstanding Award granted under the Plan, as to any Grantee or class of Grantees, provided that (A) any amendment that would adversely affect the Grantee’s rights under an outstanding Award shall not be made without the Grantee’s written consent, provided, however, that an amendment or modification that may cause an Incentive Stock Option to become a Non-Qualified Stock Option shall not be treated as adversely affecting the rights of the Grantee (B) the reduction of the exercise price of any Option awarded under the Plan and the base appreciation amount of any SAR awarded under the Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval and (C) canceling an Option or SAR at a time when its exercise price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares, in exchange for another Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, or cash buyout or other Award shall be subject to stockholder approval, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a Corporate Transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, canceling an Option or SAR in exchange for another Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, or other Award with an exercise price, purchase price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) that is equal to or greater than the exercise price or base appreciation amount (as applicable) of the original Option or SAR shall not be subject to stockholder approval;

(vii)to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Awards, including without limitation, any notice of award or Award Agreement, granted pursuant to the Plan;

(viii)to grant Awards to Employees, Directors and Independent Contractors employed outside the United States on such terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan as may, in the judgment of the Administrator, be necessary or desirable to further the purpose of the Plan;

(ix)to take such other action, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator deems appropriate; and

(x)to establish or to cause to be established a trust for purpose of purchasing Shares on the open market, holding such Shares and using such Shares to satisfy the Company’s obligations under grants of Restricted Stock Units; provided that, if the trust is established to satisfy the Company’s obligations with respect to grants of Restricted Stock Units to Participants resident in


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			103

Appendix B

Canada, such trust may be structured to qualify as an “employee benefit plan” within the meaning assigned by the Income Tax Act (Canada).

The express grant in the Plan of any specific power to the Administrator shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Administrator; provided that the Administrator may not exercise any right or power reserved to the Board. Any decision made, or action taken, by the Administrator or in connection with the administration of this Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons having an interest in the Plan.

(c)Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or as Officers or Employees of the Company or a Related Entity, members of the Board and any Officers or Employees of the Company or a Related Entity to whom authority to act for the Board, the Administrator or the Company is delegated shall be defended and indemnified by the Company to the extent permitted by law on an after-tax basis against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any Award granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days after the institution of such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at the Company’s expense to defend the same.

(5)Eligibility. Awards other than Incentive Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Directors and Independent Contractors. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company or a Parent or a Subsidiary of the Company. An Employee, Director or Independent Contractor who has been granted an Award may, if otherwise eligible, be granted additional Awards. Awards may be granted to such Employees, Directors or Independent Contractors who are residing in non-U.S. jurisdictions as the Administrator may determine from time to time.

(6)Terms and Conditions of Awards.

(a)Types of Awards. The Administrator is authorized under the Plan to award any type of arrangement to an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor that is not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan and that by its terms involves or might involve the issuance of (i) Shares, (ii) cash, or (iii) an Option, a SAR, or similar right with a fixed or variable price related to the Fair Market Value of the Shares and with an exercise or conversion privilege related to the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events, or the satisfaction of performance criteria or other conditions. Such awards include, without limitation, Options, SARs, sales or bonuses of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Dividend Equivalent Rights, Cash-Based Awards and an Award may consist of one such security or benefit, or two (2) or more of them in any combination or alternative.

(b)Designation of Award. Each Award shall be designated in the Award Agreement. In the case of an Option, the Option shall be designated as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option. However, notwithstanding such designation, an Option will qualify as an Incentive Stock Option under the Code only to the extent the $100,000 limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is not exceeded. The $100,000 limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is calculated based on the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to Options designated as Incentive Stock Options which become exercisable for the first time by a Grantee during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company). For purposes of this calculation, Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined as of the grant date of the relevant Option. In the event that the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder are amended after the date the Plan becomes effective to provide for a different limit on the Fair Market Value of Shares permitted to be subject to Incentive Stock Options, then such different limit will be automatically incorporated herein and will apply to any Options granted after the effective date of such amendment.

(c)Conditions of Award. Subject to the terms of the Plan, including Section 6(n), the Administrator shall determine the provisions, terms, and conditions of each Award including, but not limited to, the Award vesting schedule, repurchase provisions, rights of first refusal, forfeiture provisions, form of payment (cash, Shares, or other consideration) upon settlement of the Award, payment contingencies, and satisfaction of any performance criteria. The performance criteria may be applicable to the Company, Related Entities and/or any individual business units of the Company or any Related Entity. Partial achievement of the specified criteria may result in a payment or vesting corresponding to the degree of achievement as specified in the Award Agreement. In addition, the performance criteria shall be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but excluding the effect (whether positive or negative) of any change in accounting standards and any extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring item, as determined by the Administrator.

(d)Acquisitions and Other Transactions. The Administrator may issue Awards under the Plan in settlement, assumption or substitution for, outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards in connection with the Company or a Related Entity acquiring another entity, an interest in another entity or an additional interest in a Related Entity whether by merger, stock purchase, asset purchase or other form of transaction.

(e)Deferral of Award Payment. The Administrator may establish one or more programs under the Plan to permit selected Grantees the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration upon exercise of an Award, satisfaction of performance criteria, or other event that absent the election would entitle the Grantee to payment or receipt of Shares, cash or other consideration under an Award. The Administrator may establish the election procedures, the timing of such elections, the mechanisms for payments of, and accrual of


104

Appendix B

interest or other earnings, if any, on amounts, Shares or other consideration so deferred, and such other terms, conditions, rules and procedures that the Administrator deems advisable for the administration of any such deferral program.

(f)Separate Programs. The Administrator may establish one or more separate programs under the Plan for the purpose of issuing particular forms of Awards to one or more classes of Grantees on such terms and conditions as determined by the Administrator from time to time.

(g)Individual Limitations on Awards.

(i)Individual Limit for Options and SARs. The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to any Grantee in each successive twelve (12) month period shall be 300,000 Shares. In connection with a Grantee’s commencement of Continuous Service, a Grantee may be granted Options and SARs for up to a maximum of 600,000 Shares. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10, below. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder, in applying the foregoing limitations with respect to a Grantee, if any Option or SAR is canceled, the canceled Option or SAR shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to the Grantee. For this purpose, the repricing of an Option (or in the case of a SAR, the base amount on which the stock appreciation is calculated is reduced to reflect a reduction in the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock) shall be treated as the cancellation of the existing Option or SAR and the grant of a new Option or SAR.

(ii)Individual Limit for Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. For awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued to a Grantee pursuant to such Awards with respect to a successive twelve (12) month period shall be 300,000 Shares. In connection with a Grantee’s commencement of Continuous Service, up to a maximum of 600,000 Shares may be issued to the Grantee with respect to a successive twelve (12) month period relating to such commencement. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10, below.

(iii)Individual Limit for Cash-Based Awards. For Cash-Based Awards, with respect to each twelve (12) month period that constitutes or is part of each Performance Period, the maximum amount that may be paid to a Grantee pursuant to such Awards with respect to a successive twelve (12) month period shall be $5,000,000. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10 below.

(h)Deferral. If the vesting or receipt of Shares or cash under an Award is deferred to a later date, any amount (whether denominated in Shares or cash) paid in addition to the original number of Shares or amount of cash subject to such Award will not be treated as an increase in the number of Shares or amount of cash subject to the Award if the additional amount is based either on a reasonable rate of interest or on one or more predetermined actual investments such that the amount payable by the Company at the later date will be based on the actual rate of return of a specific investment (including any decrease as well as any increase in the value of an investment).

(i)Early Exercise. The Award Agreement may, but need not, include a provision whereby the Grantee may elect at any time while an Employee, Director or Independent Contractor to exercise any part or all of the Award prior to full vesting of the Award. Any unvested Shares received pursuant to such exercise may be subject to a repurchase right in favor of the Company or a Related Entity or to any other restriction the Administrator determines to be appropriate.

(j)Term of Award. The term of each Award shall be the term stated in the Award Agreement, provided, however, that the term of an Option or SAR shall be no more than seven (7) years from the date of grant thereof and the term of an Award other than an Option or SAR shall be no more than ten (10) years from the date of grant thereof. However, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Grantee who, at the time the Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, the term of the Incentive Stock Option shall be five (5) years from the date of grant thereof or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the specified term of any Award shall not include any period for which the Grantee has elected to defer the receipt of the Shares or cash issuable pursuant to the Award.

(k)Transferability of Awards. Awards may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Grantee, only by the Grantee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee may designate one or more beneficiaries of the Grantee’s Award in the event of the Grantee’s death on a beneficiary designation form provided by the Administrator.

(l)Time of Granting Awards. The date of grant of an Award shall for all purposes be the date on which the Administrator makes the determination to grant such Award, or such other later date as is determined by the Administrator.

(m)Additional Restrictions and Conditions. Awards, and the Shares or cash issued or issuable thereunder, shall be subject to the restrictions and conditions set forth in the underlying contracts with the Grantee and/or set forth in the Award Agreement for such Awards.

(n)Minimum Vesting Requirement. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, any Award granted under the Plan shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the grant date of the Award; provided, that the following Awards shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: (a) Awards granted pursuant to Section 6(d) in connection with certain acquisitions and


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			105

Appendix B

similar transactions; (b) Shares delivered in lieu of fully vested cash obligations; and (c) any additional Awards the Administrator may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 3(a)(subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 10); and provided further that the foregoing restriction shall not apply to the Administrator’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any Award, including in cases of termination without Cause, Retirement, death, Disability or in connection with or upon a Corporate Transaction or Change in Control, pursuant to the terms of the applicable Award Agreement, or otherwise. In addition, the vesting of Awards granted to Directors who are not Employees will be deemed to satisfy the one-year minimum vesting requirement to the extent the Awards vest on the earlier of (a) the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, or (b) the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding annual meeting.

(7)Award Exercise or Purchase Price, Consideration and Taxes.

(a)Exercise or Purchase Price. The exercise or purchase price, if any, for an Award shall be as follows:

(i)In the case of an Incentive Stock Option:

(A)granted to an Employee who, at the time of the grant of such Incentive Stock Option owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant; or

(B)granted to any Employee other than an Employee described in the preceding paragraph, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(ii)In the case of a Non-Qualified Stock Option, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(iii)In the case of SARs, the base appreciation amount shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.

(iv)In the case of other Awards, such price as is determined by the Administrator.

(v)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 7(a), in the case of an Award issued pursuant to Section 6(d), above, the exercise or purchase price for the Award shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the relevant instrument evidencing the agreement to issue such Award.

(b)Consideration. Subject to Applicable Laws, the consideration to be paid for the Shares to be issued upon exercise or purchase of an Award including the method of payment, shall be determined by the Administrator.

(i)In the case of an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option, in addition to any other types of consideration the Administrator may determine, the Administrator is authorized to accept as consideration for Shares issued under the Plan the following:

(A)cash through the Grantee’s Raymond James brokerage account, which must contain sufficient funds or margin availability to cover the consideration to be paid for the Shares to be issued upon exercise or purchase of an Award;

(B)surrender of Shares or delivery of a properly executed form of attestation of ownership of Shares as the Administrator may require which have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender or attestation equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which said Award shall be exercised;

(C)with respect to Options, payment through a broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure pursuant to which the Grantee (1) shall provide written instructions to a Company designated brokerage firm to effect the immediate sale of some or all of the purchased Shares and remit to the Company sufficient funds to cover the aggregate exercise price payable for the purchased Shares and (2) shall provide written directives to the Company to deliver the certificates for the purchased Shares directly to such brokerage firm in order to complete the sale transaction;

(D)with respect to Options, payment through a “net exercise” such that, without the payment of any funds, the Grantee may exercise the Option and receive the net number of Shares equal to (i) the number of Shares as to which the Option is being exercised, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the Fair Market Value per Share (on such date as is determined by the Administrator) less the exercise price per Share, and the denominator of which is such Fair Market Value per Share (the number of net Shares to be received shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number of Shares); or

(E)any combination of the foregoing methods of payment.

(ii)In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Administrator is authorized to accept as consideration for Shares issued under the Plan the following:


106

Appendix B

The Administrator may at any time or from time to time, by adoption of or by amendment to the standard forms of Award Agreement described in Section 4(b)(iv), or by other means, grant Awards which do not permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment for the Shares or which otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration.

(c)Taxes. No Shares or cash shall be delivered under the Plan to any Grantee or other person until such Grantee or other person has made arrangements acceptable to the Administrator for the satisfaction of any non-U.S., federal, state, or local income and employment tax withholding obligations, including, without limitation, obligations incident to the receipt of Shares or cash. Upon exercise or vesting of an Award the Company shall withhold or collect from the Grantee an amount sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations, including, but not limited to, by surrender of the whole number of Shares covered by the Award, if applicable, sufficient to satisfy the minimum applicable tax withholding obligations incident to the exercise or vesting of an Award (reduced to the lowest whole number of Shares if such number of Shares withheld would result in withholding a fractional Share with any remaining tax withholding settled in cash).

(8)Exercise of Award.

(a)Procedure for Exercise.

(i)Any Award granted hereunder shall be exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator under the terms of the Plan and specified in the Award Agreement.

(ii)An Award shall be deemed to be exercised when written notice of such exercise has been given to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Award by the person entitled to exercise the Award and full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Award is exercised has been made, including, to the extent selected, use of the broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure to pay the purchase price as provided in Section 7(b)(i)(C).

(b)Exercise of Award Following Termination of Continuous Service.

(i)An Award may not be exercised after the termination date of such Award set forth in the Award Agreement and may be exercised following the termination of a Grantee’s Continuous Service only to the extent provided in the Award Agreement.

(ii)Where the Award Agreement permits a Grantee to exercise an Award following the termination of the Grantee’s Continuous Service for a specified period, the Award shall terminate to the extent not exercised on the last day of the specified period or the last day of the original term of the Award, whichever occurs first.

(iii)Any Award designated as an Incentive Stock Option to the extent not exercised within the time permitted by law for the exercise of Incentive Stock Options following the termination of a Grantee’s Continuous Service shall convert automatically to a Non-Qualified Stock Option and thereafter shall be exercisable as such to the extent exercisable by its terms for the period specified in the Award Agreement.

(9)Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares.

(a)If at any time the Administrator determines that the delivery of Shares pursuant to the exercise, vesting or any other provision of an Award is or may be unlawful under Applicable Laws, the vesting or right to exercise an Award or to otherwise receive Shares pursuant to the terms of an Award shall be suspended until the Administrator determines that such delivery is lawful and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance. The Company shall have no obligation to effect any registration or qualification of the Shares under federal or state laws.

(b)As a condition to the exercise of an Award, the Company may require the person exercising such Award to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any Applicable Laws.

(10)Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company and Section 11 hereof, the number of Shares covered by each outstanding Award, and the number of Shares which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Awards have yet been granted or which have been returned to the Plan, the exercise or purchase price of each such outstanding Award, the numerical limits set forth in Section 6(g), as well as any other terms that the Administrator determines require adjustment shall be proportionately adjusted for (i) any increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination or reclassification of the Shares, or similar transaction affecting the Shares, (ii) any other increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, or (iii) any other transaction with respect to Common Stock including a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation (including a spin-off or other distribution of stock or property), reorganization, liquidation (whether partial or complete) or any similar transaction; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” In the event of any distribution of cash or other assets to stockholders other than a normal cash dividend, the Administrator shall also make such adjustments as provided in this Section 10 or substitute, exchange or grant Awards to effect such adjustments (collectively “adjustments”). Any such adjustments to outstanding Awards will be effected in a manner that precludes the enlargement of rights and benefits under such Awards. In connection with the foregoing adjustments, the Administrator may,


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			107

Appendix B

in its discretion, prohibit the exercise of Awards or other issuance of Shares, cash or other consideration pursuant to Awards during certain periods of time. Except as the Administrator determines, no issuance by the Company of shares of any class, or securities convertible into shares of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason hereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of Shares subject to an Award.

(11)Corporate Transactions and Changes in Control.

(a)Termination of Award to Extent Not Assumed in Corporate Transaction. Effective upon the consummation of a Corporate Transaction, all outstanding Awards under the Plan shall terminate. However, all such Awards shall not terminate to the extent they are Assumed in connection with the Corporate Transaction.

(b)Acceleration of Award Upon Corporate Transaction or Change in Control.

(i)Corporate Transaction. Except as provided otherwise in an individual Award Agreement, in the event of a Corporate Transaction and:

(A)for the portion of each Award that was granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a Grantee’s annual bonus (as determined by the Administrator and designated in the Award Agreement) and that is Assumed or Replaced, then such Award (if Assumed), the replacement Award (if Replaced), or the cash incentive program (if Replaced) automatically shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) for all of the Shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such Assumed or Replaced portion of the Award, immediately upon the Grantee’s Separation from Service if such service is terminated by the successor company or the Company without Cause or voluntarily by the Grantee with Good Reason on or within eighteen (18) months after the Corporate Transaction; and

(B)for the portion of each Award that was not granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a Grantee’s cash annual bonus and that is Assumed or Replaced, then a pro-rated amount of the unvested Shares or other consideration subject to such Award (if Assumed), the replacement Award (if Replaced), or the cash incentive program (if Replaced) automatically shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) immediately upon the Grantee’s Separation from Service if such service is terminated by the successor company or the Company without Cause or voluntarily by the Grantee with Good Reason on or within eighteen (18) months after the Corporate Transaction. For this purpose, the pro-rated amount will be determined by comparing completed, full months of service, if any, since the grant date of the Award to the vesting schedule or restricted period set forth in the Award Agreement; and

(C)for the portion of each Award that is neither Assumed nor Replaced, such portion of the Award shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) for all of the Shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such portion of the Award, immediately prior to the specified effective date of such Corporate Transaction, provided that the Grantee’s Continuous Service has not terminated prior to such date. For Awards that have an exercise feature, the portion of the Award that is not Assumed shall terminate under subsection (a) of this Section 11 to the extent not exercised prior to the consummation of such Corporate Transaction.

(ii)Change in Control. Except as provided otherwise in an individual Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control and:

(A)for the portion of each Award that was granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a Grantee’s annual bonus (as determined by the Administrator and designated in the Award Agreement), then such Award automatically shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) for all of the Shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such Award, immediately upon the Grantee’s Separation from Service if such service is terminated by the successor company or the Company without Cause or voluntarily by the Grantee with Good Reason on or within eighteen (18) months after the Change in Control; and

(B)for the portion of each Award that was not granted in lieu of a cash payment for all or a portion of a Grantee’s cash annual bonus, then a pro-rated amount of the unvested Shares or other consideration subject to such Award automatically shall become fully vested, exercisable and payable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at Fair Market Value) immediately upon the Grantee’s Separation from Service if such service is terminated by the successor company or the Company without Cause or voluntarily by the Grantee with Good Reason on or within eighteen (18) months after the Change in Control. For this purpose, the pro-rated amount will be determined by comparing completed, full months of service, if any, since the grant date of the Award to the vesting schedule or restricted period set forth in the Award Agreement.

(c)Effect of Acceleration on Incentive Stock Options. Any Incentive Stock Option accelerated under this Section 11 in connection with a Corporate Transaction or Change in Control shall remain exercisable as an Incentive Stock Option under the Code only to the extent the $100,000 dollar limitation of Section 422(d) of the Code is not exceeded.


108

Appendix B

(12)Effective Date and Term of Plan. The Plan originally became effective on November 22, 2011 and was extended for a term of ten (10) years from February 18, 2016. It shall continue in effect for a term of ten (10) years from February 22, 2023 unless sooner terminated. Subject to Section 17, below, and Applicable Laws, Awards may be granted under the Plan upon its becoming effective.

(13)Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan.

(a)The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the Plan; provided, however, that no such amendment shall be made without the approval of the Company’s stockholders to the extent such approval is required by Applicable Laws, or if such amendment would lessen the stockholder approval requirements of Section 4(b)(vi) or this Section 13(a).

(b)No Award may be granted during any suspension of the Plan or after termination of the Plan.

(c)No suspension or termination of the Plan (including termination of the Plan under Section 11, above) shall adversely affect any rights under Awards already granted to a Grantee.

(14)Reservation of Shares.

(a)The Company, during the term of the Plan, will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.

(b)The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

(15)No Effect on Terms of Employment/Consulting Relationship. The Plan shall not confer upon any Grantee any right with respect to the Grantee’s Continuous Service, nor shall it interfere in any way with his or her right or the right of the Company or any Related Entity to terminate the Grantee’s Continuous Service at any time, with or without cause including, but not limited to, Cause, and with or without notice. The ability of the Company or any Related Entity to terminate the employment of a Grantee who is employed at will is in no way affected by its determination that the Grantee’s Continuous Service has been terminated for Cause for the purposes of this Plan.

(16)No Effect on Retirement and Other Benefit Plans. Except as specifically provided in a retirement or other benefit plan of the Company or a Related Entity, Awards shall not be deemed compensation for purposes of computing benefits or contributions under any retirement plan of the Company or a Related Entity, and shall not affect any benefits under any other benefit plan of any kind or any benefit plan subsequently instituted under which the availability or amount of benefits is related to level of compensation. The Plan is not a “Pension Plan” or “Welfare Plan” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

(17)Stockholder Approval. The grant of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall be subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months before or after the date the Plan is adopted excluding Incentive Stock Options issued in substitution for outstanding Incentive Stock Options pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code. Such stockholder approval shall be obtained in the degree and manner required under Applicable Laws. The Administrator may grant Incentive Stock Options under the Plan prior to approval by the stockholders, but until such approval is obtained, no such Incentive Stock Option shall be exercisable. In the event that stockholder approval is not obtained within the twelve (12) month period provided above, all Incentive Stock Options previously granted under the Plan shall be exercisable as Non-Qualified Stock Options.

(18)Unfunded Obligation. Grantees shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Grantees pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Neither the Company nor any Related Entity shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Grantee account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Administrator, the Company or any Related Entity and a Grantee, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Grantee or the Grantee’s creditors in any assets of the Company or a Related Entity. The Grantees shall have no claim against the Company or any Related Entity for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

(19)Construction. Captions and titles contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Use of the term “or” is not intended to be exclusive, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

(20)Non-exclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan by the Board, the submission of the Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval, nor any provision of the Plan will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of Awards otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.


2023 PROXY STATEMENT			109

INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: THE RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL CENTER
880 CARILLON PARKWAY // ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33716 // 800.248.8863
RAYMONDJAMES.COM



o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
~~Filed by the Registrant~~ þ o

~~Filed by a Party other than the Registrant~~ ¨

~~Check the appropriate box:~~

¨ ~~Preliminary proxy statement~~

¨ Confidential, ~~For~~for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x
þ	Definitive Proxy Statement
o
¨	Definitive Additional Materials
o
¨	Soliciting Material ~~Pursuant to § 240.14a-12~~under §240.14a-12

required
o						Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
¨o						Fee computed on table ~~below~~in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and ~~0-11.~~0-11



	~~(4)~~	~~Proposed maximum aggregate~~
We put clients first. If we do what’s right for our clients, the firm will do well and we’ll all benefit.	We act with integrity. We put others above self, and what’s right above what’s easy. We believe doing well and doing good aren’t mutually exclusive.	We value ~~of transaction:~~independence. We respect autonomy, celebrate individuality and welcome diverse perspectives, while encouraging collaboration and innovation.	We think long term. We act responsibly, taking a conservative approach that translates into a strong, stable firm for clients, advisors, associates and shareholders.

Agenda The following proposals will be voted upon:
2.			Proposal 1: To elect the ten (10) director nominees named in the Proxy Statement
			Proposal 2: To hold an advisory vote on our executive ~~compensation;~~

compensation
3.			Proposal 3: To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation
			Proposal 4: To approve the Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan
			Proposal 5: To ratify ~~the appointment of KPMG LLP as the company’s~~our independent registered public accounting firm for ~~the~~ fiscal ~~year ending September 30, 2018; and~~



			~~(1)~~	~~Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:~~



	~~(2)~~	~~Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:~~



OUR VISION Our vision is to be a financial services firm as unique as the people we serve, transforming lives, businesses and communities through the power of personal relationships and professional advice.	~~(3)~~	~~Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant~~ OUR MISSION Our business is people and their financial well-being. We are committed to ~~Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated~~helping individuals, corporations and ~~state how it was determined):~~



¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



	~~Paul C. Reilly~~
	~~Chairman and Chief Executive Officer~~ Susan N. Story Lead Independent Director


1. Date and Time Thursday, February 23, 2023, 4:30 p.m. (EST) Place The meeting will be a virtual-only meeting, conducted exclusively via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RJF2023. There will not be a physical location for the meeting, so you will not be able to attend the meeting in person. Shareholders will be able to attend, vote, and submit questions (both before, and during a portion of, the meeting) virtually. Record Date December 21, 2022 (“Record Date”)			~~To elect eleven (11) directors to the Board of Directors, to hold office until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2019;~~

2023
4.						Other: To ~~consider and~~ act ~~upon such~~on any other business asthat may properly come before the meeting ~~or any adjournment thereof.~~


1.
Who Can Vote Shareholders of record on the Record Date	Who Can Attend All shareholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. To attend the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting. com/RJF2023, you must enter the control number on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), proxy card or voting instruction form. The virtual meeting room will open at 4:15 p.m. (EST).	Date of Mailing A Notice or the Proxy Statement, ~~for the~~a 2022 Annual ~~Meeting;~~Report to Shareholders, and a form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders and participants in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or about January 11, 2023.


2.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on February 23, 2023: The ~~2017~~Proxy Statement, the 2022 Annual Report to ~~Shareholders;~~Shareholders and


3.	~~The~~ the form of proxy card ~~being distributed in connection with the Annual Meeting. Control/identification numbers~~ are ~~contained in the proxy materials accompanying this notice.~~available online at www.raymondjames.com/investor-relations/news-and-events/shareholders-meeting.



þx						No fee ~~required.~~



	~~(1)~~	~~Amount Previously Paid:~~



	~~(2)~~	~~Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:~~



	~~(3)~~	~~Filing Party:~~



2023 PROXY STATEMENT		~~By Order of the Board of Directors,~~

	~~Jonathan N. Santelli, Secretary~~

~~January 8, 2018~~	5


Letters from Leadership			3
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders			5
Company Highlights			7
Proxy Summary			10

~~QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING YOUR SHARES~~Proposal 1 – Election of Directors			118
~~PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS~~Our Directors			618
Board Non-Executive Nominees - Composition and Skills			18
~~INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTOR NOMINEES~~Director Biographies			820
~~CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~Election of Directors			1225
~~INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES~~Director Independence			1425
~~BOARD MEETINGS AND ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS~~Director Tenure			1425
~~COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND MEETINGS~~Nominating Process and Succession Planning			1426
~~THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE~~Nominations by Shareholders			1526
~~THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, NOMINATING AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE~~Corporate Governance			1627
~~THE SECURITIES REPURCHASE COMMITTEE~~Role of the Board			1827
~~THE SECURITIES OFFERINGS COMMITTEE~~Corporate Governance Principles			1827
Board Leadership Structure			28
~~DIRECTOR COMPENSATION~~Board Committees			1929
~~SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS~~Meetings and Attendance			2131
~~SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT~~Director Education and Orientation			2231
~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~Board Evaluations			2332
~~Compensation Discussion and Analysis~~Key Areas of Board Oversight			2333
Director Compensation			38

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation			40
Compensation Discussion & Analysis			41
Compensation-Setting Process			41
Objectives of O ur Compensation Program			47
Changes to Our Executive Officer CompensationPractices			47
Principal Elements of Executive Compensation			48
Base Salaries			48
Annual Bonus			49
Use of Equity Compensation			50
Other Benefits			53


2022 Compensation Decisions			53
Components of Total Direct Compensation			59
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			3960
All Other Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			4061
Grants of Plan Based Awards for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			4062
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for ~~201~~20227			4263
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			4565
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			4566
Potential Payments ~~Upon~~u pon Termination or Change in Control for Fiscal ~~201~~20227			4767
~~Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee Report~~2022 CEO Pay Ratio			4969
~~COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION~~Other Compensation Policies			4969
~~REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE~~Income Deduction Limitations under Section 162(m)			5070
~~FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~Report of the Compensation and Talent Committee			5070

Proposal 3 – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote			71

Proposal 4 – Approval of th e Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan			72

Proposal 5 – Ratify Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			80

Security Ownership Information			82
~~CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS~~Political Contributions Disclosure			5185
~~RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY~~Relationships and Related Transactions			5285
~~EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION~~Questions and Answers a bout the Annual Meeting			5387
~~SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE~~Additional Information			5493
~~PROPOSAL NO. 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~Appendix A			5595
~~PROPOSAL NO. 3 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP Financial Measures (Unaudited)			5795
~~ADDITIONAL INFORMATION~~Appendix B			5899
Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan			99


in millions, except per share amounts	2022	2021	% Change
Net Revenues	$11,003	$9,760	13%
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders	$1,505	$1,403	7%
Earnings per Common Share (Diluted)	$6.98	$6.63	5%
Common Shareholders’ Equity Attributable to RJF	$9,338	$8,245	13%
Common Shares Outstanding(1)	215.1	205.7	5%
Book Value per Share	$43.41	$40.08	8%



~~Why did I receive this Proxy Statement?~~		Proposal 1	You have received these proxy materials because Raymond James’s Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting on February 22, 2018. This proxy statement includes information that is designed to assist you in voting your shares and information that we are required to provide to you under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’). On January 8, 2018, we mailed this proxy statement to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 18, 2017 (‘‘Record Date’’).

~~What is a proxy?~~	A ‘‘proxy’’ is a written authorization from you to another person that allows such person (the ‘‘proxy holder’’) to vote your shares on your behalf. The Board of Directors is asking you to allow any of the following persons to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting: Paul C. Reilly, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas A. James, Chairman Emeritus.

~~Who is entitled to vote?~~	~~Each Raymond James shareholder of record on the Record Date for the Annual Meeting is entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.~~

~~What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder ‘‘of record’’ and as a ‘‘beneficial owner’’?~~	l	~~Shareholders of Record.~~ ~~You are a shareholder of record if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare, our transfer agent.~~
	l	~~Beneficial Owner.~~ You are a beneficial owner if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were held by a brokerage firm or other nominee and not in your name. Being a beneficial owner means that, like most of our shareholders, your shares are held in ‘‘street name.’’ As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will be able to vote your shares with respect to some of the proposals, but not all. Please see ~~‘‘What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted ?’’ for additional information.~~
	l	Raymond James has requested banks, brokerage firms and other nominees who hold Raymond James shares on behalf of beneficial owners of the shares as of the close of business on the Record Date to forward proxy materials to those beneficial owners. Raymond James has agreed to pay the reasonable expenses of the banks, brokerage firms and other nominees for forwarding these materials.

~~How many votes do I have?~~	Every holder of a share of common stock on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote per share for each Director to be elected at the Annual Meeting and to one vote per share on each other matter presented at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date there were 145,433,833 shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.



~~What proposals are being presented at the Annual Meeting?~~			~~Raymond James intends to present proposals numbered one through three for shareholder consideration and voting at the Annual Meeting. These proposals are for:~~
	1.	Election of ~~eleven (11) members of the Board of Directors;~~
Directors			2.	~~Advisory vote to approve executive compensation;~~
	3.	~~Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm.~~
	Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, Raymond James does not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxies received from our shareholders give the proxy holders the authority to vote on such matter in their discretion.

~~How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?~~	~~The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:~~
~~How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?~~	l	~~FOR the election of the eleven (11) directors nominated by our Board and named in this proxy statement;~~
	l	~~FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; and~~
	l	~~FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm.~~

~~How do I attend the Annual Meeting?~~	~~All shareholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting.~~ If your Raymond James shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, contact your bank or broker to obtain a written legal proxy in order to vote your shares at the meeting. If you do not obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker, you will not be entitled to vote your shares, but you can still attend the Annual Meeting.

~~How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?~~	~~You may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy:~~
	l	~~By Mail:~~ If you have received your proxy materials by mail, you can vote by marking, dating and signing your proxy card and returning it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you hold your shares in an account with a bank or broker (~~i.e.~~, in ‘‘street name’’), you can vote by following the instructions on the voting instruction card provided to you by your bank or broker. Proxy cards returned by mail must be received no later than the close of business on February 21, 2018.
	l	~~Via the Internet:~~ ~~You can submit a proxy via the Internet until 1:00 a.m. Central Time on February 22, 2018, by accessing the web site at~~ ~~http://www.investorvote.com/RJF~~ and following the instructions you will find on the web site. Internet proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. You will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
	l	~~By Telephone:~~ ~~You can submit a proxy by telephone until 1:00 a.m. Central Time on February 22, 2018, by calling toll-free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) (from the U.S. and Canada) and following the instructions.~~
	Even if you plan to be present at the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy using one of the methods described above. Raymond James shareholders of record who attend the meeting may vote their shares in person, even though they have sent in proxies.



~~What if my shares are held in the Raymond James ESOP?~~
		For participants in the Raymond James Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ‘‘ESOP’’), your shares will be voted as you instruct the trustee of the ESOP. There are three ways to vote: by returning your proxy card, via the Internet or by telephone. Please follow the instructions included on your proxy card on how toThe Board recommends a vote using one of the three methods. Your vote will serve as voting instructions to the trustee of the ESOP for shares allocated to your account. If you do not vote shares allocated to your account held in the ESOP, your shares will nevertheless be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as it votes the shares of ESOP participants who have instructed the trustee on how to vote. You cannot vote your ESOP shares in person at the meeting. ~~To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustee of the ESOP, our transfer agent must receive your vote by no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 19, 2018.~~FOReach director nominee.

~~May I change or revoke my vote?~~	~~Yes. You may change your vote in one of several ways at any time before it is exercised:~~
	l	~~Grant a subsequent proxy via the Internet or telephone;~~
	l	~~Submit another proxy card (or voting instruction card) with a date later than your previously delivered proxy;~~
	l	Notify our Secretary in writing before the Annual Meeting that you are revoking your proxy or, if you hold your shares in ‘‘street name,’’ follow the instructions on the voting instruction card; or
	l	~~If you are a shareholder of record, or a beneficial owner with a proxy from the shareholder of record, vote in person at the Annual Meeting.~~

~~What will happen if I do not vote my shares?~~	l	~~Shareholders of Record.~~ If you are the shareholder of record of your shares and you do not vote in person at the Annual Meeting, or by proxy by mail, via the Internet or by telephone, your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting.See page 18
	l	~~Beneficial Owners~~. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, your broker or nominee may vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has discretion to vote. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’), your broker or nominee has discretion to vote your shares on routine matters, such as Proposal 3, but does not have discretion to vote your shares on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1 and 2. Therefore, if you do not instruct your broker as to how to vote your shares on Proposals 1 or 2, this would be a ‘‘broker non-vote,’’ and your shares would not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal. ~~We therefore strongly encourage you to instruct your broker or nominee on how you wish to vote your shares.~~

~~What is the effect of a broker non-vote or abstention?~~	Under NYSE rules, brokers or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. A ‘‘broker non-vote’’ occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. Pursuant to our By-laws, broker non-votes and abstentions are not counted as ‘‘votes cast’’ on such matter, but are counted for quorum purposes.


				Director Since	Committee Membership
Name and Primary Occupation		Independent	Age		ARC	CG&ESG	C&T	CPC
	Marlene Debel Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, MetLife, Inc.		56	2020
	Robert M. Dutkowsky Former Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, Tech Data Corporation		68	2018
	Jeffrey N. Edwards Chief Operating Officer, New Vernon Advisers, LP		61	2014
	Benjamin C. Esty Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration		60	2014
	Anne Gates Former President, MGA Entertainment, Inc.		63	2018
	Thomas A. James Chair Emeritus and former Chief Executive Officer		80	1974
	Gordon L. Johnson President, Highway Safety Devices, Inc.		65	2010
	Roderick C. McGeary Former Chairman, Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Tegile Systems, Inc.		72	2015
	Paul C. Reilly Chair and Chief Executive Officer		68	2006
	Raj Seshadri President, Data and Services, Mastercard Incorporated		57	2019

~~What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to~~ ~~be voted?~~	l	~~Shareholders of Record. If you are a shareholder of record and you submit a signed proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, all of your shares will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3.~~
ARC		l	~~Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner~~Audit and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under NYSE rules, brokers and other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters, such as Proposal 3, but do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1 and 2. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee may only vote your shares on Proposal 3 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. Risk Committee
CG&ESG
~~What does it mean if I receive more than one set of Proxy Materials?~~	~~It means you own Raymond James shares in more than one account, such as individually~~Corporate Governance and jointly with your spouse. Please vote all of your shares. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials may contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of such document(s) be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future. In addition, if you are the beneficial owner, your broker, bank or other nominee may deliver only one copy of the proxy materials to multiple shareholders who share an address unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the beneficial owners. Raymond James will deliver promptly, upon request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of such document(s) was delivered. Shareholders who wish to receive a separate written copy of such documents, now or in the future, should submit their request to our Secretary by writing Raymond James Financial, Inc., Attn: Secretary, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716.

~~What is a quorum?~~	A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders representing a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the company entitled to vote at the meeting constitutes a quorum for the conduct of business.

~~What vote is required in order to approve each proposal?~~	For each of Proposals 1, 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the ‘‘votes cast’’ on such proposal at the Annual Meeting is required. Our By-laws provide that a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted ‘‘for’’ a proposal must exceed the number of shares voted ‘‘against’’ such proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as ‘‘votes cast’’ with respect to such proposal. (In the case of any contested director election, directors are elected by a plurality of the ‘‘votes cast.’’)

~~How will voting on any other business be conducted?~~	Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, we do not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on the matter in their discretion.

~~What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed?~~	~~Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled Annual Meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.~~

~~Who will count the votes?~~	~~Our General Counsel and Secretary will act as the inspector of election and will tabulate the votes.~~
	ESG Committee


C&T			Compensation and Talent Committee
CPC			Capital Planning Committee


Board Independence and Qualifications			•Nine of our current 11 directors, and eight of our 10 director nominees, are non-executive directors who have been deemed independent under Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules •All of our Board committees other than the CPC are composed exclusively of independent directors •Nominees to our Board may not serve on more than three (3) other public company boards
Board Diversity and Refreshment			•38% of our non-executive director nominees are people of color •38% of our non-executive director nominees are women •Non-executive directors are normally expected to serve for no more than 12 years
Accountability			•Directors are elected for one-year terms •Directors must receive a majority vote of our shareholders to be re-elected •Special meetings of shareholders may be called by holders of 10% or more of our common shares •Our shareholders may act by written consent in lieu of a meeting •We do not maintain a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill” •We maintain a Director Code of Conduct applicable to the Board •A robust compensation recoupment (“clawback”) policy applicable to executive officers, with triggers including materially imprudent judgment causing financial or reputational harm
Lead Independent Director			•A lead independent director, selected by our independent directors, operates pursuant to a separate written charter •Duties include presiding over executive sessions, recommending agenda topics, facilitating annual self-evaluation of Board and its committees, assisting in performance evaluation of our CEO, and CEO succession planning
Board Oversight of Risk Management			•Our Board exercises oversight of management’s responsibilities to assess and manage our key risks, including cybersecurity risks •The Board has delegated aspects of its oversight responsibility to its principal committees •The Board recently split its committees in order to further enhance subject matter oversight in certain focus areas
Board Practices			•Our Board and committees annually review their effectiveness with a questionnaire and confidential one-on-one interviews coordinated by the lead independent director, who reports on results in person to the Board •Evaluation includes review of individual director contributions to Board functioning by each other director •The Board continually adjusts its nomination criteria, with the goal that the Board continues to reflect an appropriate mix of skills and experience
Executive Sessions			•Non-executive directors hold executive sessions without management present at least four times per year •The lead independent director presides over these executive sessions •Each major Board committee generally holds executive sessions at regularly scheduled meetings
Share Ownership Requirements and Trading Limitations			•Robust stock ownership policy requires directors and executive officers to maintain meaningful ownership levels in our stock •Policy restricts trading by directors and executive officers and prohibits certain types of transactions, including use of options, short sales, hedging and pledging of our stock



			Proposal 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
			The Board recommends a vote FORthis proposal.			See page 40



			Proposal 3 Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote
			The Board recommends a vote for "every year" onthis proposal.			See page 71



			Proposal 5 Ratify Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
			The Board recommends a vote FORthis proposal.			See page 80



What is being voted on:Election to our Board of 10 director nominees.			Board recommendation:After a review of the individual qualifications and experience of each of our director nominees and his or her contributions to our Board, our Board determined unanimously to recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” all of our director nominees.



			Marlene Debel, 56 Non-Executive Director

			Director Since:2020 RJF Committees •Audit and Risk •Capital Planning Committee			Other Public Directorships •Current: None •Former (past 5 years): None


Career Highlights •MetLife, Inc., a leading global provider of insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management services ▷Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (2019 – present) ▷Executive Vice President and Head of Retirement & Income Solutions (2018 – 2019) ▷Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Business (2016 – 2018) ▷Executive Vice President and Treasurer (2011 – 2016) •Global Head of Liquidity Risk Management and Rating Agency Relations, Bank of America (2009 – 2011) •Assistant Treasurer, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (2007 – 2008)			Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement •Foundation Board Member, LaGuardia Community College •Former Board Member, Women’s Forum of New York

Key Experience and Qualifications •Finance and risk management experience:Deep knowledge of finance and more than three decades of experience in financial, strategic and risk management •Financial services management and leadership:Proven business leader who has helped guide organizations through periods of significant growth and change



			Robert M. Dutkowsky, 68 Non-Executive Director

			Director Since:2018 RJF Committees •Compensation and Talent			Other Public Directorships •Current: U.S. Foods Holding Corp. (non-executive chair since January 5, 2023); Pitney Bowes; The Hershey Company •Former (past 5 years): Tech Data Corporation (2006 – 2020)


Career Highlights •Tech Data Corporation, a multinational IT products and services distribution company ▷Executive Chairman (2017 – 2020) ▷Chief Executive Officer (2006 – 2018) •President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman, Egenera, Inc., a multinational cloud manager and data center infrastructure automation company (2004 – 2006) •President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, J.D. Edwards & Co., Inc., an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software company (2002 – 2004) •President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, GenRad, Inc., a manufacturer of electronic automatic test equipment and related software (2000 – 2002)			Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement •Board of Directors, First Tee of Tampa Bay •Board of Directors, Moffitt Research Committee •Advisory Board, University of South Florida Business School •Board of Trustees, University of Tampa

Key Experience and Qualifications •Technology and technology risks:More than 40 years of experience in the information technology industry, including senior executive positions in sales, marketing and channel distribution with leading manufacturers and software publishers •Corporate governance and leadership:Valuable governance perspectives from substantial senior executive leadership roles and experience as a board member and chair of several public and private companies



			Jeffrey N. Edwards, 61 Non-Executive Director

			Director Since:2014 RJF Committees •Corporate Governance and ESG •Compensation and Talent •Capital Planning Committee			Other Public Directorships •Current: American Water Works Company, Inc. •Former (past 5 years): None